Allergy to ophthalmic preservatives

Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 447-453

  Hong, Jison ^a   Bielory, Leonard ^a,b  

^a RUTGERS NEW JERSEY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b STARx Allergy and Asthma Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Eyedrops; Hypersensitivity; Ophthalmic; Preservatives; Topical; Toxic

Indexed keywords

4 HYDROXYBENZOIC ACID ESTER; AGENTS ACTING ON THE EYE; BENZALKONIUM; BENZALKONIUM CHLORIDE; BETAXOLOL; CHLORBUTOL; CHLORHEXIDINE; CHLORHEXIDINE ACETATE; CHLORHEXIDINE GLUCONATE; EDETIC ACID; IMMUNOGLOBULIN E; LATANOPROST; METHYL PARABEN; NEOMYCIN; PHENETHYL ALCOHOL; PRESERVATIVE; PROPYL PARABEN; THIOMERSAL; TIMOLOL; TIMOLOL MALEATE;

ALLERGIC CONJUNCTIVITIS; ANAPHYLACTIC SHOCK; ANAPHYLAXIS; BRONCHOSPASM; CONJUNCTIVITIS; CONTACT URTICARIA; DELAYED HYPERSENSITIVITY; DRUG HYPERSENSITIVITY; EYE ALLERGY; HUMAN; IMMUNE SYSTEM; KERATITIS; KERATOCONJUNCTIVITIS; MAST CELL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRURITUS; REVIEW; TOPICAL TREATMENT;

ANIMALS; DRUG HYPERSENSITIVITY; EYE DISEASES; HUMANS; HYPERSENSITIVITY, DELAYED; HYPERSENSITIVITY, IMMEDIATE; OPHTHALMIC SOLUTIONS; PRESERVATIVES, PHARMACEUTICAL;

EID: 69749088546     PISSN: 15284050     EISSN: 14736322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e3283306990     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Wilson FM 2nd. Allergy to topical medications. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2003; 43:73-81.
2. Uter W, Menezes de Padua C, Pfahlberg A, et al. Contact allergy to topical ophthalmological drugs: epidemiological risk assessment. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2009; 226:48-53.
3. Tosti A, Tosti G. Thimerosal: a hidden allergen in ophthalmology. Contact Dermatitis 1988; 18:268-273.
4. Kilp H. The dry eye and contact lens. Fortschr Ophthalmol 1986; 83:125.
5. Dastychova E, Necas M, Vasku V. Contact hypersensitivity to selected excipients of dermatological topical preparations and cosmetics in patients with chronic eczema. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Panonica Adriat 2008; 17:61-68. (Pubitemid 352002672)
6. Pellinen P, Lokkila J. Corneal penetration into rabbit aqueous humor is comparable between preserved and preservative-free tafluprost. Ophthalmic Res 2009; 41:118-122. This study evaluated the corneal penetration of preservative-free tafluprost 0.0015% eye drops and tafluprost 0.0015% eye drops preserved with 0.01% BAC into the aqueous humor of rabbits. After the administration of a single topical dose (30 ml), the maximum concentrations at 45 min of tafluprost acid in aqueous humor were 4.50 ng/ml for preservative-free tafluprost and 3.99 ng/ml for preserved tafluprost indicating that BAC does not affect corneal penetration in rabbit aqueous humor.
7. Becquet F, Goldschild M, Moldovan MS, et al. Histopathological effects of topical ophthalmic preservatives on rat corneoconjunctival surface. Curr Eye Res 1998; 17:419-425. (Pubitemid 28178417)
8. Baudouin C. Allergic reaction to topical eyedrops. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2005; 5:459-463.
9. Mietz H, Schlotzer-Schrehardt U, Lemke JH, Krieglstein GK. Early conjunctival changes following treatment with metipranolol and preservatives are not reversible with dexamethasone. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1997; 235:452-459. (Pubitemid 27334253)
10. Epstein SP, Ahdoot M, Marcus E, Asbell PA. Comparative toxicity of preservatives on immortalized corneal and conjunctival epithelial cells. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2009; 25:113-119. A study that is currently in the process of publication found that the order of decreasing toxicity at the most commonly used concentrations: thimerosal (0.0025%) more than BAC (0.025%) more than chlorobutanol (0.25%) more than methyparaben (0.01%) more than sodium perborate (0.0025%) approximately EDTA (0.01%). The study was performed using a tissue culture model utilizing immortalized corneal and conjunctival epithelial cells and evaluating the potential toxicity of these common components and their comparative effects on the ocular surface. Even at low concentration, these agents were shown to cause some degree of ocular tissue damage.
11. Goto Y, Ibaraki N, Miyake K. Human lens epithelial cell damage and stimulation of their secretion of chemical mediators by benzalkonium chloride rather than latanoprost and timolol. Arch Ophthalmol 2003; 121:835-839. (Pubitemid 36676221)
12. Hamard P, Blondin C, Debbasch C, et al. In vitro effects of preserved and unpreserved antiglaucoma drugs on apoptotic marker expression by human trabecular cells. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2003; 241:1037-1043.
13. Uter W, Lessmann H, Geier J, Schnuch A. Is the irritant benzalkonium chloride a contact allergen? A contribution to the ongoing debate from a clinical perspective. Contact Dermatitis 2008; 58:359-363. (Pubitemid 351733065)
14. Lee BH, Kim SH. Benzalkonium chloride induced bronchoconstriction in patients with stable bronchial asthma. Korean J Intern Med 2007; 22:244-248.
15. Ishibashi T, Yokoi N, Kinoshita S. Comparison of the short-term effects on the human corneal surface of topical timolol maleate with and without benzalkonium chloride. J Glaucoma 2003; 12:486-490. (Pubitemid 37494177)
16. Baines MG, Cai F, Backman HA. Ocular hypersensitivity to thimerosal in rabbits. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991; 32:2259-2265.
17. Agrawal A, Kaushal P, Agrawal S, et al. Thimerosal induces TH2 responses via influencing cytokine secretion by human dendritic cells. J Leukoc Biol 2007; 81:474-482. (Pubitemid 46198399)
18. Nguyen DQ, Srinivasan S, Hiscott P, Kaye SB. Thimerosal-induced limbal stem cell failure: report of a case and review of the literature. Eye Contact Lens 2007; 33:196-198.
19. Garvey LH, Kroigaard M, Poulsen LK, et al. IgE-mediated allergy to chlorhexidine. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007; 120:409-415.
20. Bae YJ, Park CS, Lee JK, et al. A case of anaphylaxis to chlorhexidine during digital rectal examination. J Korean Med Sci 2008; 23:526-528.
21. Nagendran V, Wicking J, Ekbote A, et al. IgE-mediated chlorhexidine allergy: a new occupational hazard? Occup Med (Lond) 2009; 59:270-272.
22. Parkes AW, Harper N, Herwadkar A, Pumphrey R. Anaphylaxis to the chlorhexidine component of Instillagel: a case series. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102:65-68.
23. Vaahtoranta-Lehtonen HH, Lehtonen OP, Peltola O. Contact lens care using chlorhexidine acetate with ethyl-6-O-decanoyl-glucoside: a comparative clinical and bacteriological study. CLAO J 1997; 23:270-274. (Pubitemid 27454563)
24. Anders N, Wollensak J. Inadvertent use of chlorhexidine instead of balanced salt solution for intraocular irrigation. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997; 23:959-962. (Pubitemid 27375317)
25. Doughty MJ. Acute effects of chlorobutanol- or benzalkonium chloride-containing artificial tears on the surface features of rabbit corneal epithelial cells. Optom Vis Sci 1994; 71:562-572.
26. Tripathi BJ, Tripathi RC. Cytotoxic effects of benzalkonium chloride and chlorobutanol on human corneal epithelial cells in vitro. Lens Eye Toxic Res 1989; 6:395-403.
27. Ayaki M, Yaguchi S, Iwasawa A, Koide R. Cytotoxicity of ophthalmic solutions with and without preservatives to human corneal endothelial cells, epithelial cells and conjunctival epithelial cells. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2008; 36:553-559.
28. Garcia-Medina JJ, Garcia-Medina M, Zanon-Moreno VC, et al. Conjunctival provocation test for the diagnosis of ocular hypersensitivity to chlorobutanol. Cornea 2007; 26:94-97. (Pubitemid 46041571)
29. Jong CT, Statham BN, Green CM, et al. Contact sensitivity to preservatives in the UK, 2004-2005: results of multicentre study. Contact Dermatitis 2007; 57:165-168.
30. Nagel JE, Fuscaldo JT, Fireman P. Paraben allergy. JAMA 1977; 237:1594-1595.
31. Henry JC, Tschen EH, Becker LE. Contact urticaria to parabens. Arch Dermatol 1979; 115:1231-1232.
32. Dutot M, Paillet H, Chaumeil C, et al. Severe ocular infections with contact lens: role of multipurpose solutions. Eye 2009; 23:470-476. This study demonstrates via cytofluorometry study that contact lens multipurpose solutions containing preservatives are cytotoxic through caspase 3 induction, chromatin condensation and P2X7 cell-death receptor activation, in contrast with unpreserved sterile isotonic saline solutions that were found inert. Multipurpose solutions seem to be preservative but not disinfecting agents and are not adapted to the final rinse of contact lenses because of apoptosis induction, which could explain part of lens intolerance.