Can management strategy minimize the impact of red tape on organizational performance?

Administration and Society

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 423-448

  Walker, Richard M ^a,b   Brewer, Gene A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

English local government; Management strategy; Organizational performance; Red tape

Indexed keywords

EID: 69449095831     PISSN: 00953997     EISSN: 15523039     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0095399709338027     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Aiken, M., & Hage, J. (1968). Organizational interdependence and intra-organizational structure. American Sociological Review, 33, 912-930.
2. Amburgey, T. L., Kelly, D., & Barnett, W. P. (1990). Resetting the clock: The dynamics of organizational change and failure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 51-73.
3. Amirkhanyan, A. A., Kim, H. J., & Lambright, K. T. (2008). Does the public sector outperform the nonprofit and for-profit sectors? Evidence from a national panel study on nursing homes quality and access. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27, 326-353.
4. Andrews, R. (2005). Analysing deprivation and local authority performance: Implications for CPA. Public Money & Management, 24, 19-26.
5. Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., Law, J., & Walker, R. M. (2005). External constraints and public sector performance: The case of comprehensive performance assessment in English local government. Public Administration, 83, 639-656.
6. Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2006a). Strategy content and organizational performance: An empirical analysis. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 52-63.
7. Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2006b). Subjective and objective measures of organizational performance: An empirical exploration. In G. A. Boyne, K. J. Meier, L. J. O'Toole Jr., & R. M. Walker (Eds.), Public services performance: Perspectives on measurement and management (pp. 14-34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Armstrong, H. W., & Taylor, J. (2000). Regional economics and policy. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
9. Audit Commission. (2002). Comprehensive performance assessment. London: Author.
10. Baldwin, J. N. (1990). Perceptions of public versus private sector personnel and informal red tape and their impact on motivation. American Review of Public Administration, 20, 7-28.
11. Barnett, W. P., & Freeman, J. (2001). Too much of a good thing? Product proliferation and organizational failure. Organization Science, 21, 539-558.
12. Blair, T. (2002). The courage of our convictions: Why reform of the public services is the route to social justice (Fabian Ideas 603). London: Fabian Society.
13. Bowman, C., & Ambrosini, V. (1997). Using single respondents in strategy research. British Journal of Management, 8, 119-132.
14. Boyne, G. A. (2002). Concepts and indicators of local authority performance: An evaluation of the statutory framework in England and Wales. Public Money & Management, 22, 17-24.
15. Boyne, G. A., Farrell, C., Law, J., Powell, M., & Walker, R. M. (2003). Evaluating public management reform. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
16. Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2004). Strategy content and public service organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 231-252.
17. Bozeman, B. (1993). A theory of government red tape. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3, 273-303.
18. Bozeman, B. (2000). Bureaucracy and red tape. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19. Bozeman, B., Reed, P., & Scott, P. (1992). Red tape and task delays in public and private organizations. Administration & Society, 24, 290-322.
20. Bretschneider, S. (1990). Managing information systems in public and private organizations: An empirical test. Public Administration Review, 50, 536-545.
21. Brewer, G. A. (2005). In the eye of the storm: Frontline supervisors and federal agency performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 505-527.
22. Brewer, G. A. (2006). All measures of performance are subjective: More evidence on U.S. federal agencies. In G. A. Boyne, K. J. Meier, L. J. O'Toole Jr., & R. M. Walker (Eds.), Public services performance: Perspectives on measurement and management (pp. 34-45). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23. Brewer, G. A., & Selden, S. C. (2000). Why elephants gallop: Assessing and predicting organizational performance in federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 685-711.
24. Brewer, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (in press). The impact of red tape on organizational performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.
25. Buchanan, B. (1975). Red tape and the service ethic: Some unexpected differences between public and private managers. Administration & Society, 6, 423-444.
26. Carter, N., Klein, R., & Day, P. (1992). How organizations measure success: The use of performance indicators in government. London: Routledge.
27. Chun, Y. H., & Rainey, H. G. (2005). Goal ambiguity and organizational performance in U.S. federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 1-30.
28. Conant, J. S., Mokwa, M. P., & Varadarajan, P. R. (1990). Strategic types, distinctive marketing competencies and organizational performance: A multiple measures-based study. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 365-383.
29. Coursey, D. H., & Pandey, S. K. (2007). Content domain, measurement, and validity of the red tape concept. A second-order confirmatory factor analysis. The American Review of Public Administration, 37, 342-361.
30. Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2006). Phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations: Effects of environment, organization and top managers. British Journal of Management, 17, 215-236.
31. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions. (2000). Indices of deprivation 2000. London: HMSO.
32. Enticott, G. (2003). Researching local government using electronic surveys. Local Government Studies, 29, 52-67.
33. Enticott, G., Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (in press). The use of multiple informants in public administration research: Data aggregation using organizational echelons. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.
34. Evans, J. D., & Green, C. L. (2000). Marketing strategy, constituent influence, and resource allocation: An application of the Miles and Snow typology to closely held firms in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy. Journal of Business Research, 50, 2225-2231.
35. Gershon, Sir P. (2004). Releasing resources to the front-line: Independent review of public sector efficiency. London: HM Treasury.
36. Hambrick, D. C. (1983). Some tests of the effectiveness and functional attributes of Miles and Snow's strategic types. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 5-26.
37. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. The American Journal of Sociology, 82, 929-964.
38. Hawes, J. M., & Crittenden, W. F. (1984). A taxonomy of competitive retailing strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 275-287.
39. Kelly, J. M., & Swindell, D. (2002). A multiple-indicator approach to municipal service evaluation: Correlating performance measurement and citizen satisfaction across jurisdictions. Public Administration Review, 62, 610-620.
40. Martin, S., Walker, R. M., Ashworth, R., Boyne, G. A., Enticott, G., Entwistle, T., et al. (2003). The long term evaluation of best value and its impact: Baseline report. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
41. Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure and process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
42. Miller, D., & Friesen, P. (1984). A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle. Management Science, 30, 1161-1183.
43. Office for National Statistics. (2003). Census, 2001. National report for England and Wales. London: Office for National Statistics.
44. Office of Public Service Reform. (2002). Reforming our public services: Principles into practice. London: The Prime Minister's Office of Public Service Reform.
45. Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government. New York: Addison-Wesley.
46. Osborne, S. P., & Brown, K. (2005). Managing change and innovation in public service organizations. London: Routledge.
47. Ostrom, E. (1973). The need for multiple indicators of measuring the output of public agencies. Policy Studies Journal, 2, 85-91.
48. Pandey, S. K. (2003). National Administrative Studies Project (NASP-II): A national survey of managers in state health and human service agencies. Camden, NJ: Rutgers University, Department of Public Policy and Administration.
49. Pandey, S. K., Coursey, D. H., & Moynihan, D. P. (2007). Organizational effectiveness and bureaucratic red tape: A multimethod study. Public Performance and Management Review, 30, 398-425.
50. Pandey, S. K., & Kingsley, G. A. (2000). Examining red tape in public and private organizations: Alternative explanations from a social psychological model. Journal of Public Administration and Research and Theory, 10, 779-799.
51. Pandey, S. K., & Moynihan, D. P. (2006). Bureaucratic red tape and organizational performance: Testing the moderating role of culture and political support. In G. A. Boyne, K. J. Meier, L. J. O'Toole Jr., & R. M. Walker (Eds.), Public services performance: Perspectives on measurement and management (pp. 130-151). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52. Pandey, S. K., & Scott, P. G. (2002). Red tape: A review and assessment of concepts and measures. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12, 553-580.
53. Park, R. B. (1984). Linking objective and subjective measures of performance. Public Administration Review, 44, 118-127.
54. Pettigrew, A. M.,Ferlie, E., & McKee, L. (1992). Shaping strategic change. London: Sage.
55. Pollitt, C. (2005). Decentralisation: A central concept in contemporary public management. In E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynn, & C. Pollitt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
56. Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (2001). Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review, 61, 414-423.
57. Rainey, H. G. (1979). Perceptions of incentives in business and government: Implications for civil service reform. Public Administration Review, 39, 440-448.
58. Rainey, H. G. (1997). Understanding and managing public organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
59. Rainey, H. G., & Bozeman, B. (2000). Comparing public and private organizations: Empirical research and the power of the a priori. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 447-469.
60. Rainey, H. G., Pandey, S. K., & Bozeman, B. (1995). Research note: Public and private managers' perceptions of red tape. Public Administration Review, 55, 567-574.
61. Shortell, S. M., & Zajac, E. J. (1990). Perceptual and archival measures of Miles and Snow's strategic types: A comprehensive assessment of reliability and validity. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 817-832.
62. Snow, C. C., & Hbrebiniak, L. G. (1980). Strategy, distinctive competence, and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 317-336.
63. Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 221-232.
64. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
65. Turaga, R. M. R., & Bozeman, B. (2005). Red tape and public mangers' decision-making. American Review of Public Administration, 35, 363-379.
66. Walker, R. M., & Boyne, G. A. (2006). Public management reform and organizational performance: An empirical assessment of the U. K. Labour government's service improvement strategy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25, 371-393.
67. Walker, R. M., & Brewer, G. A. (in press). An organizational echelon analysis of the determinants of red tape in public organizations. Public Administration Review.
68. Walker, R. M., & Enticott, G. (2004). Using multiple-informants in public administration: Revisiting the managerial values and actions debate. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 417-434.
69. Wall, T. B., Michie, J., Patterson, M., Wood, S. J., Sheehan, M., Clegg, C. W., et al. (2004). On the validity of subjective measures of company performance. Personnel Psychology, 57, 95-118.
70. Woodside, A. G., Sullivan, D. P., & Trappey, R. J. (1999). Assessing relationships among strategic types, distinctive marketing competencies, and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 45, 135-146.
71. Zajac, E. J., & Shortell, S. M. (1989). Changing generic strategies: Likelihood, direction and performance implications. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 413-430.