Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend?

Organizational Research Methods

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 221-232

  Spector, Paul E ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b Department of Industrial/Organizational ^*

Author keywords

Construct validity; Measurement bias; Method variance; Monomethod bias

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745218501     PISSN: 10944281     EISSN: 15527425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1094428105284955     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Boswell, W. R., Boudreau, J. W., & Dunford, B. B. (2004). The outcomes and correlates of job search objectives: Searching to leave or searching for leverage? Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1083-1091.
2. Brief, A. P., Burke, M. J., George, J. M., Robinson, B., & Webster, J. (1988). Should negative affectivity remain an unmeasured variable in the study of job stress? Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 193-198.
3. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
4. Chan, D. (2001). Method effects of positive affectivity, negative affectivity, and impression management in selfreports of work attitudes. Human Performance, 14, 77-96.
5. Chen, P. Y., Dai, T., Spector, P. E., & Jex, S. M. (1997). Relationship between negative affectivity and positive affectivity: Effects of judged desirability of scale items and respondent's social desirability. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 183-198.
6. Chen, P. Y., & Spector, P. E. (1991). Negative affectivity as the underlying cause of correlations between stressors and strains. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 398-407.
7. Connolly, J. J., & Viswesvaran, C. (2000). The role of affectivity in job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 265-281.
8. Crampton, S. M., & Wagner, J. A., III. (1994). Percept-percept inflation in microorganizational research: An investigation of prevalence and effect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 67-76.
9. Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. (1988, April). Method variance in I/O research major effect or mythical beast? Paper presented at the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Conference, Dallas, TX.
10. Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. (1998). Common methods bias: Does common methods variance really bias results? Organizational Research Methods, 1, 374-406.
11. Frese, M. (1985). Stress at work and psychosomatic complaints: A causal interpretation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 314-328.
12. Frese, M., & Zapf, D. (1988). Methodological issues in the study of work stress: Objective vs. subjective measurement of stress at work and the question of longitudinal studies. In C. L. Cooper & R. Payne (Eds.), Causes, coping, and consequences of stress at work (pp. 375-411). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
13. Glick, W. H., Jenkins, G. D., Jr., & Gupta, N. (1986). Method versus substance: How strong are underlying relationships between job characteristics and attitudinal outcomes? Academy of Management Journal, 29, 441-464.
14. Lance, C. E., Baxter, D., & Mahan, R. P. (2005). Evaluation of alternative perspectives on source effects in multisource performance measures. In W. Bennett Jr., C. E. Lance, & D. J. Woehr (Eds.), Performance measurement: Current perspectives and future challenges. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Lance, C. E., Newbolt, W. H., Gatewood, R. D., Foster, M. R., French, N. R., & Smith, D. E. (2000). Assessment center exercise factors represent cross-situational specificity, not method bias. Human Performance, 13, 323-353.
16. Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 114-121.
17. Moorman, R. H., & Podsakoff, P. M. (1992). A meta-analytic review and empirical test of the potential confounding effects of social desirability response sets in organizational behavior research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65, 131-149.
18. Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Reiss, A. D. (1996). Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 660-679.
19. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
20. Podsakoff, P. M., & Todor, W. D. (1985). Relationships between leader reward and punishment behavior and group processes and productivity. Journal of Management, 11, 55-73.
21. Rorer, L. G. (1965). The great response-style myth. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 129-156.
22. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (Eds.). (1969). Artifact in behavioral research. New York: Academic Press.
23. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
24. Shavelson, R. J., & Webb, N. M. (1991). Generalizability theory: A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Spector, P. E. (1987). Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problem? Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 438-443.
26. Spector, P. E. (1994). Using self-report questionnaires in OB research: A comment on the use of a controversial method. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 385-392.
27. Spector, P. E., & Brannick, M. T. (1995). The nature and effects of method variance in organizational research. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 249-274). New York: John Wiley.
28. Spector, P. E., Fox, S., & Van Katwyk, P. T. (1999). The role of negative affectivity in employee reactions to jobs: Nuisance effect or substantive effect? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 205-218.
29. Spector, P. E., Jex, S. M., & Chen, P. Y. (1995). Personality traits as predictors of objective job characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 59-65.
30. Spector, P. E., Zapf, D., Chen, P. Y., & Frese, M. (2000). Why negative affectivity should not be controlled in job stress research: Don't throw out the baby with the bath water. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 79-95.
31. Watson, D., Pennebaker, J. W., & Folger, R. (1987). Beyond negative affectivity: Measuring stress and satisfaction in the workplace. In J. M. Ivancevich & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Job stress: From theory to suggestion (pp. 141-157). New York: Haworth Press.
32. Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1994). An alternative approach to method effects using latent-variable models: Applications in organizational behavior research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 323-331.
33. Williams, L. J., & Brown, B. K. (1994). Method variance in organizational behavior and human resources research: Effects on correlations, path coefficients, and hypothesis testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 185-206.