Rethinking the history of science popularization/popular science

Popularizing Science and Technology in the European Periphery, 1800-2000

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-20

  Topham, Jonathan R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 69449087236     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (71)

1. Edward Shils, Center and Periphery: Essays in Macrosociology (Chicago and London, 1975), pp. 3-16.
2. Svante Lindqvist, 'Introductory Essay: Harry Martinson and the Periphery of the Atom', in Svante Lindqvist (ed.), Center on the Periphery: Historical Aspects of 20th-Century Swedish Physics (Canton, MA, 1993), pp. xxiv-xxvi.
3. Roger Cooter and Stephen Pumfrey, 'Separate Spheres and Public Places: Reflections on the History of Science Popularization and Science in Popular Culture', History of Science, 32 (1994): 237-67, p. 239.
4. Roger Cooter and Stephen Pumfrey, 'Separate Spheres and Public Places: Reflections on the History of Science Popularization and Science in Popular Culture', History of Science, 32 (1994): 254, p. 253.
5. Roger Cooter and Stephen Pumfrey, 'Separate Spheres and Public Places: Reflections on the History of Science Popularization and Science in Popular Culture', History of Science, 32 (1994): 254, p. 254.
6. Jonathan R Topham, 'Beyond the "Common Context": The Production and Reading of the Bridgewater Treatises', Isis, 89 (1998): 233-62;
7. Roger Chartier, 'Texts, Printings, Readings', in Lynn Hunt (ed.), The New Cultural History (Berkeley, 1989), pp. 154-75
8. Robert Darnton, 'What is the History of Books?', in The Kiss of Lamourette: Reflections in Cultural History (London and New York, 1990), pp. 107-35.
9. James A Secord, 'Knowledge in Transit', Isis, 95 (2004): 654-72, p. 659.
10. James A Secord, 'Knowledge in Transit', Isis, 95 (2004): 663-4, p. 659.
11. James A Secord, 'Knowledge in Transit', Isis, 95 (2004): 661, p. 659.
12. James A Secord, 'Knowledge in Transit', Isis, 95 (2004): 670, p. 659.
13. Lorraine Daston, 'Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective', Social Studies of Science, 22 (1992): 597-618
14. Daston, 'Scientific Objectivity with and without Words', in Peter Becker and William Clark (eds), Little Tools of Knowledge: Historical Essays on Academic and Bureaucratic Practices (Ann Arbor, MI, 2001), pp. 259-84
15. Simon Schaffer, 'Genius in Romantic Natural Philosophy', in Andrew Cunningham and Nicholas Jardine (eds), Romanticism and the Sciences (Cambridge, 1990), pp. 82-98
16. Timothy L. Alborn, 'The Business of Induction: Industry and Genius in the Language of British Scientific Reform, 1820-1840', History of Science, 34 (1996): 91-121
17. Ruth Barton, '"Men of Science": Language, Identity and Professionalization in the Mid-Victorian Scientific Community', History of Science, 41 (2003): 73-119
18. Graeme Gooday, 'Liars, Experts and Authorities', History of Science, 46 (2008): 431-56.
19. Topham, 'Beyond the "Common Context"'; Darnton, 'What is the History of Books?', pp. 110-13.
20. James A. Secord, Victorian Sensation: The Extraordinary Publication, Reception, and Secret Authorship of 'Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation' (Chicago, 2000).
21. 'Popular Physics', Dublin University Magazine, 39 (1852): 27-32, p. 27.
22. 'Literature for the People', The Times, 9 February 1854, p. 10.
23. 'Science for the People', Eclectic Review, n.s. 9 (1855): 293-309, p. 294.
24. Whitwell Elwin, 'Popular Science', Quarterly Review, 84 (1849): 307-44
25. Jonathan R. Topham, 'Publishing "Popular Science" in Early Nineteenth-Century Britain', in Aileen Fyfe and Bernard Lightman (eds), Science in the Marketplace: Nineteenth-Century Sites and Experiences (Chicago, 2007), pp. 135-68, p. 135.
26. Thomson-Gale, Eighteenth-Century Collections Online (April 2006).
27. Thomson-Gale, The Times Digital Archive, 1785-1985 (April 2006).
28. Chadwyck-Healey, British Periodicals Collection 1 (October 2007).
29. Daston, 'Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective'; Daston, 'Scientific Objectivity with and without Words'.
30. Oxford English Dictionary Online (April 2006).
31. Morag Shiach, Discourse on Popular Culture: Class, Gender and History in Cultural Analysis, 1730 to the Present (Cambridge, 1989), pp. 27-8.
32. Jonathan R. Topham, 'Scientific Publishing and the Reading of Science in Nineteenth-Century Britain: A Historiographical Survey and Guide to Sources', Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 31 (2000): 559-612.
33. Shiach, Discourse on Popular Culture, pp. 28-9.
34. Simon Schaffer, 'Scientific Discoveries and the End of Natural Philosophy', Social Studies of Science, 16 (1986): 387-420.
35. Andrew Cunningham, 'Getting the Game Right: Some Plain Words on the Identity and Invention of Science', Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 19 (1988): 365-89
36. Cunningham and Perry Williams, 'De-Centring the "Big Picture": The Origins of Modern Science and the Modern Origins of Science', British Journal for the History of Science, 26 (1993): 407-32.
37. Andrew Cunningham, 'A Genealogy of the Increasing Gap between Science and the Public', Public Understanding of Science, 10 (2001): 99-113.
38. Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent, 'A Genealogy of the Increasing Gap between Science and the Public', Public Understanding of Science, 10 (2001): 106.
39. e siècles (Paris, 1997), pp. 13-30.
40. Bensaude-Vincent, 'La science populaire: Ancêtre ou rivale de la vulgarisation?', Protée: Théorie et pratiques sémiotiques, 16 (1988): 85-91.
41. Louis Guilbert, René Lagane and Georges Niobey (eds), Grand Larousse de la langue française, 7 vols (Paris, 1978).
42. Bensaude-Vincent, Rasmussen, La science populaire dans la presse et l'édition, p. 14
43. Andreas W. Daum, Wissenschaftspopularisierung im 19. Jahrhundert: Bürgerliche Kultur, naturwissenschaftliche Bildung und die deutsche Öffentlichkeit, 1848-1914, 2nd edn (Munich, 2002), pp. 33-42.
44. Nick Hopwood, '[Review of Wissenschaftspopularisierung im 19. Jahrhundert, by Andreas Daum]', British Journal for the History of Science, 37 (2004): 357-8.
45. Guido Giglioni, '[Review of Irritating Experiments, by Huber Steinke]', Bulletin for the History of Medicine, 81 (2007): 662-4, p. 663.
46. Stephen Hilgartner, 'The Dominant View of Popularization: Conceptual Problems, Political Uses', Social Studies of Science, 20 (1990): 519-39, pp. 533-4.
47. Jonathan R. Topham, 'The Mirror of Literature, Amusement and Instruction and Cheap Miscellanies in Early Nineteenth-Century Britain', in Geoffrey Cantor et al., Reading the Magazine of Nature: Science in the Nineteenth-Century Periodical (Cambridge, 2004), pp. 37-66 (see pp. 63-6)
48. Topham, 'Thomas Byerley, John Limbird, and the Production of Cheap Periodicals in Regency Britain', Book History, 8 (2005): 75-106.
49. Topham, 'Popular Science Periodicals in Paris and London: The Emergence of a Low Scientific Culture, 1820-1875', Annals of Science, 42 (1985): 549-72, p. 551.
50. Anne Secord, 'Botany on a Plate: Pleasure and the Power of Pictures in Promoting Early Nineteenth-Century Scientific Knowledge', Isis, 93 (2002): 28-57, p. 28.
51. Anne Secord, 'Botany on a Plate: Pleasure and the Power of Pictures in Promoting Early Nineteenth-Century Scientific Knowledge', Isis, 93 (2002): 28-57, p. 29.
52. Martin Rudwick, 'Charles Darwin in London: The Integration of Public and Private Science,' Isis, 73 (1982): 186-206.
53. Alborn, 'The Business of Induction', p. 95.
54. T.H. Huxley, 'The Vestiges of Creation', British and Foreign Medico-Chirurgical Review, 13 (1854): 425-39, p. 438.
55. Steven Jay Gould, Bully for Brontosaurus: Reflections in Natural History (New York, 1991), p. 11.
56. John Walsh, 'Science for the People: Comes the Evolution', Science, n.s. 191 (1976): 1033-5.
57. Gillian Fuller, 'Cultivating Science: Negotiating Discourse in the Popular Texts of Stephen Jay Gould', in J.R. Martin and Robert Veel (eds), Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science (London and New York, 1998), pp. 35-62, pp. 36-8.
58. Ludwik Fleck, Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact, eds Thaddeus J. Trenn and Robert K. Merton, trans. Fred Bradley and Thaddeus J. Trenn (Chicago, 1979).
59. Ludwik Fleck, Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact, eds Thaddeus J. Trenn and Robert K. Merton, trans. Fred Bradley and Thaddeus J. Trenn (Chicago, 1979)112.
60. Theodore M. Porter, The Rise of Statistical Thinking, 1820-1900 (Princeton, 1986), pp. 113-14.
61. Fleck, Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact, p. 112.
62. Robert M. Young, Darwin's Metaphor: Nature's Place in Victorian Culture (Cambridge, 1985)
63. Gillian Beer, Darwin's Plots: Evolutionary Narrative in Darwin, George Eliot and Nineteenth-Century Fiction, 2nd edn (Cambridge, 2000).
64. Richard Whitley, 'Knowledge Producers and Knowledge Acquirers: Popularisation as a Relation Between Scientific Fields and their Publics', in Terry Shinn and Richard Whitley (eds), Expository Science: Forms and Functions of Popularisation (Dordrecht, 1985), pp. 3-28, p. 6.
65. Charles Lyell, 'Address to the Geological Society, Delivered at the Anniversary, on the 17th of February, 1837', Proceedings of the Geological Society of London, 2 (1833-8): 479-523, p. 517.
66. Nicolaas A. Rupke, The Great Chain of History: William Buckland and the English School of Geology, 1814-1849 (Oxford, 1983), p. 183.
67. Richard Dawkins, The Selfish Gene (Oxford, 2006), pp. xxi-xxii.
68. Richard Dawkins, The Selfish Gene (Oxford, 2006), pp. xvi.
69. Alan Grafen, 'The Intellectual Contribution of The Selfish Gene to Evolutionary Theory', in Alan Grafen and Mark Ridley (eds), Richard Dawkins: How a Scientist Changed the Way We Think (Oxford, 2006), pp. 66-74, pp. 71-2.
70. Sally Shuttleworth, 'Tickling Babies: Gender, Authority, and "Baby Science"', in Geoffrey Cantor et al., Science in the Nineteenth Century Periodical: Reading the Magazine of Nature (Cambridge, 2004), pp. 199-215, p. 199.
71. Christopher Hamlin, 'Games Editors Played or Knowledge Readers Made?', Isis, 96 (2005): 633-42, p. 642.