Furnished cage system and hen well-being: Comparative effects of furnished cages and battery cages on behavioral exhibitions in White Leghorn chickens

Poultry Science

Volumn 88, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1559-1564

  Pohle, K ^a   Cheng, H W ^b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Battery cage; Behavior; Chicken; Furnished cage; Well being

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL HOUSING; ANIMAL WELFARE; ARTICLE; CHICKEN; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ANIMAL WELFARE; ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CHICKENS; FEMALE; HOUSING, ANIMAL;

AVES; GALLUS GALLUS;

EID: 68849132129     PISSN: 00325791     EISSN: 15253171     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3382/ps.2009-00045     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Appleby, M. C. 1998. Modification of laying hens cages to improve behavior. Poult. Sci. 77:1828-1832.
2. Appleby, M. C., and B. O. Hughes. 1991. Welfare of laying hens in cages and alternative systems: Environmental, physical and behavioural aspects. World's Poult. Sci. J. 47:109-128.
3. Appleby, M. C., S. F. Smith, and B. O. Hughes. 1993. Nesting, dustbathing and perching by laying hens in cages-Effects of design on behavior and welfare. Br. Poult. Sci. 34:835-847.
4. Appleby, M. C., A. W. Walker, C. J. Nicol, A. C. Lindberg, R. Freire, B. O. Hughes, and H. A. Eison. 2002. Development of furnished cages for laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 43:489-500.
5. Baxter, M. R. 1994. The welfare problems of laying hens in battery cages. Vet. Rec. 134:614-619.
6. Braastad, B. O. 1990. Effects on behavior and plumage of a keystimuli floor and a perch in trip cages for laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 27:127-139.
7. Bubier, N. E. 1996. The behavioural priorities of laying hens: The effect of two methods of environment enrichment on time budgets. Behav Processes 37:239-249.
8. CEC (Commission of the European Communities). 1998. Council directive for laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens kept in various systems of rearing. CEC Directive 1999/74/EG.
9. CEC (Commission of the European Communities). 1999. Laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens. Off. J. Eur. Communities L203:53-57.
10. Cooper, J. L., and M. J. Albentosa. 2003. Behavioural priorities of laying hens. Avian Poult. Biol. Rev. 14:127-149.
11. Cooper, J. J., and M. C. Appleby. 2003. The value of environmental resources to domestic hens: A comparison of the work-rate for food and for nests as a function of time. Anim. Welf. 12:39-52.
12. Cordiner, L. S., and C. J. Savory. 2000. Use of perches and nestboxes by laying hens in relation to social status, based on examination of consistency of ranking orders and frequency of interaction. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 71:305-317.
13. Cunningham, D. L., and J. M. Mauldin. 1996. Cage housing, beak trimming, and induced molting of layers: A review of welfare and production issues. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 5:63-69.
14. Dawkins, M. S. 1999. The role of behaviour in the assessment of poultry welfare. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 20:295-303.
15. Dawkins, M. S., C. A. Donnelly, and T. A. Jones. 2004. Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density. Nature 427:342-344.
16. Duncan, E. T., M. C. Appleby, and B. O. Hughes. 1992. Effect of perches in laying cages on welfare and production of hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 33:25-35.
17. Duncan, I. J. H., and D. G. M. Wood-Gush. 1972. Thwarting of feeding behaviour in the domestic fowl. Anim. Behav. 20:444-451.
18. Elston, J. J., M. M. Beck, S. D. Kachman, and S. E. Scheideler. 2000. Laying hen behavior. 1. Effects of cage type and startle stimuli. Poult. Sci. 79:471-476.
19. Fleming, R. H., C. C. Whitehead, D. Alvey, N. G. Gregory, and L. J. Wilkins. 1994. Bone structure and breaking strength in laying hens housed in different husbandry systems. Br. Poult. Sci. 35:651-662.
20. Folsch, D. W., and K. Vestergaard. 1981. The Behaviour of Fowl. The Normal Behaviour and the Effect of Different Housing Systems and Rearing Methods-Animal Management. Vol. 12. Birkauser, Basel, Switzerland.
21. Gvaryahu, G., E. Ararat, E. Asaf, M. Levy, J. I. Weller, B. Robinson, and N. Snapir. 1994. An enrichment object that reduces aggressiveness and mortality in caged laying hens. Physiol. Behav. 55:313-316.
22. Hansen, I. 1994. Behaviour expression of laying hens in aviaries and cages: Frequences, time budgets and facility utilization. Br. Poult. Sci. 35:491-508.
23. Hester, P. Y. 2005. Impact of science and management on the welfare of egg laying atrains of hens. Poult. Sci. 84:687-696.
24. Hoppitt, W., L. Blackburnt, and K. N. LaLand. 2007. Response facilitation in the domestic fowl. Anim. Behav. 73:229-238.
25. Hughes, B. O., S. Wilson, M. C. Appleby, and S. F. Smith. 1993. Comparison of bone volume and strength as measures of skeletal integrity of caged laying hens with access to perches. Res. Vet. Sci. 54:202-206.
26. Hy-Line International. 2006. Commercial Management Guide for W-36. Hy-Line International, West Des Moines, IA.
27. Johnson, P. F., K. S. Vestergaard, and G. Norgaard-Nielsen. 1998. Influence of early rearing conditions on the development of feather pecking and cannibalism in domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 60:25-41.
28. Koba, T., Y. Kodama, K. Shimizu, S. Nomura, M. Sugawara, Y. Kobayashi, and T. Ogasawara. 2001. Persistent behavioural changes in rats following inescapable shock stress: A potential model of posttraumatic stress disorder. World J. Biol. Psychiatry 2:34-37.
29. Kopka, M. N., H. W. Cheng, and P. Y. Hester. 2003. Bone mineral density of laying hens housed in enriched versus conventional cages. Poult. Sci. 82(Suppl. 1):29. (Abstr.)
30. Lindberg, A. C., and C. J. Nicol. 1997. Dustbathing in modified battery cages: Is sham dustbathing an adequate substitute? Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 55:113-128.
31. Maxwell, M. H. 1993. Avian blood leukocyte response to stress. World's Poult. Sci. J. 49:34-43.
32. Mertens, K., F. Bamelis, K. Mertens, F. Bamelis, B. Kemps, B. Kamers, E. Verhoelst, B. De Ketelaere, M. Bain, E. Decuypere, and J. De Baerdemaeker. 2006. Monitoring of eggshell breakage and eggshell strength in different production chains of consumption eggs. Poult. Sci. 85:1670-1677.
33. Moesta, A., A. Briese, U. Knierim, and J. Hartung. 2008. Behaviour of laying hens in aviaries-Review. Part 2: Feeding behaviour, reproductive and dust bathing behaviour of chickens. Dtsch. Tierarztl. Wochenschr. 115:4-14.
34. Newberry, R. C. 1995. Environmental enrichment: Increasing the biological relevance of captive environments. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 44:229-243.
35. Newberry, R. C. 1999. Exploratory behaviour of young domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 63:311-321.
36. Nicol, C. 1995. Environmental enrichment for birds. Pages 1-25 in Environmental Enrichment Information Resources for Laboratory Animals: 1965-1995: Birds, Cats, Dogs, Farm Animals, Ferrets, Rabbits, and Rodents. AWIC Resource Series No. 2. USDA, Beltsville, MD.
37. Pohle, K. M. 2007. Housing effect on productivity, behavior, and physiology of laying hens: Furnished cages vs. conventional battery cages. MS Thesis. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
38. Rogers, L. J. 1995.The Development of Brain and Behaviour in the Chicken. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
39. Schneider, T., J. Turczak, and R. Przewlocki. 2006. Environmental enrichment reverses behavioral alterations in rats prenatally exposed to valproic acid: Issues for a therapeutic approach in autism. Neuropsychopharmacology 31:36-46.
40. Tauson, R. 1998. Health and production in improved cage designs. Poult. Sci. 77:1820-1827.
41. Tauson, R. 2004. Management and housing systems for layers-Effects on welfare and production. World's Poult. Sci. J. 61:477-487.
42. Vestergaard, K. S., E. Skadhauge, and L. G. Lawson. 1997. The stress of not being able to perform dustbathing in laying hens. Physiol. Behav. 62:413-419.
43. Wechsler, B., E. Frohlich, H. Oester, T. Oswald, J. Troxler, R. Weber, and H. Schmid. 1997. The contribution of applied ethology in judging animal welfare in farm animal housing systems. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 53:33-43.
44. Weeks, C. A., and C. J. Nicol. 2006. Behavioral needs, priorities and preferences of laying hens. World's Poult. Sci. J. 62:296-307.
45. Widowski, T. M., and I. J. H. Duncan. 2000. Working for a dustbath: Are hens increasing pleasure rather than reducing suffering? Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 68:39-53.
46. Widowski, T. M., and P. H. Hemsworth. 2008. Housing hens to suit their "needs". Page 241 in Proc. XXIII World's Poultry Congress, Brisbane, Australia.
47. Yue, S., and I. J. Duncan. 2003. Frustrated nesting behaviour: Relating to extra-cuticular shell calcium and bone strength in White Leghorn hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 44:175-181.
48. Zupan, M., A. Kruschwitz, T. Buchwalder, B. Huber-Eicher, and I. Stuhec. 2008. Comparison of the prelaying behavior of nest layers and litter layers. Poult. Sci. 87:399-404.