Exploratory behaviour of young domestic fowl

Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 311-321

  Newberry, Ruth C ^a,b  

^a Center for the Study of Animal Well being   (United States)

^b Pharmacology   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal welfare; Boredom; Broiler chicken; Environmental enrichment; Exploration; Use of space

Indexed keywords

GALLUS GALLUS;

EID: 0033617093     PISSN: 01681591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00016-7     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ambrose H.W. Effect of habitat familiarity and toe-clipping on rate of owl predation in Microtus pennsylvanicus. J. Mammal. 53:1972;909-912.
2. Berlyne, D.E., 1960. Conflict, Arousal, and Curiosity. McGraw-Hill, New York, 350 pp.
3. Blair R., Newberry R.C., Gardiner E.E. Effects of lighting pattern and dietary tryptophan supplementation on growth and mortality in broilers. Poultry Sci. 72:1993;495-502.
4. Classen H.L., Riddell C., Robinson F.E. Effects of increasing photoperiod length on performance and health of broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 32:1991;21-29.
5. Collias N.E., Collias E.C. A field study of the red jungle fowl in north-central India. Condor. 69:1967;360-386.
6. Dawkins M.S. Battery hens name their price: consumer demand theory and the measurement of ethological 'needs'. Anim. Behav. 20:1983;209-225.
7. Dawkins M.S. Distance and social recognition in hens: implications for the use of photographs as social stimuli. Behaviour. 133:1996;663-680.
8. Estevez I., Newberry R.C., Arias de Reyna L. Broiler chickens: a tolerant social system? Etologia. 5:1997;19-29.
9. Ferchmin P.A., Bennett E.L., Rosenzweig M.R. Direct contact with enriched environment is required to alter cerebral weights in rats. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 88:1975;360-367.
10. Kolb B., Whitshaw I.Q. Brain plasticity and behaviour. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 49:1998;43-64.
11. Humphrey, N.K., 1976. The social function of intellect. In: Bateson, P.P.G., Hinde, R.A. (Eds.), Growing Points in Ethology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 303-317.
12. Mather J.A. Cognition in cephalopods. Adv. Study Behav. 24:1995;317-353.
13. McBride G., Parer I.P., Foenander F. The social organisation and behaviour of the feral domestic fowl. Anim. Behav. Monogr. 2:1969;127-181.
14. Mench, J.A., 1998. Environmental enrichment and the importance of exploratory behaviour. In: Shepherdson, D.J., Mellen, J.D., Hutchins, M. (Eds.), Second Nature Environmental Enrichment for Captive Animals. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 30-46.
15. Milinski, M., Parker, G.A., 1991. Competition for resources. In: Krebs, J.R., Davies, N.B. (Eds.), Behavioural Ecology An Evolutionary Approach. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 137-168.
16. Murphy L.B., Wood-Gush D.G.M. The interpretation of the behaviour of domestic fowl in strange environments. Biol. Behav. 3:1978;39-61.
17. Newberry R.C. Environmental enrichment: increasing the biological relevance of captive environments. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 44:1995;229-243.
18. Newberry R.C., Hall J.W. Use of pen space by broiler chickens: effects of age and pen size. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 25:1990;125-136.
19. Newberry R.C., Shackleton D.M. Use of visual cover by domestic fowl: a Venetian blind effect? Anim. Behav. 54:1997;387-395.
20. Nicol C.J. Behavioural responses of laying hens following a period of spatial restriction. Anim. Behav. 35:1987;1709-1719.
21. Nicol C.J., Guildford T. Exploratory activity as a measure of motivation in deprived hens. Anim. Behav. 41:1991;333-341.
22. Petherick J.C., Duncan I.J.H. Behaviour of young domestic fowl directed towards different substrates. Br. Poult. Sci. 30:1989;229-238.
23. Poucet B. Spatial cognitive maps in animals: new hypotheses on their structure and neural mechanisms. Psychol. Rev. 100:1993;163-182.
24. Renner, M.J., Rosenzweig, M.R., 1987. Enriched and Impoverished Environments Effects on Brain and Behaviour. Springer, New York, 134 pp.
25. SAS Institute, 1989. User's Guide, Version 6, 4th edn. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.
26. Stamps J. Motor learning and the value of familiar space. Am. Nat. 146:1995;41-58.
27. Thinus-Blanc C., Bouzouba L., Chaiz K., Chapuis N., Durup M., Poucet B. A study of spatial parameters encoded during exploration in hamsters. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Proc. 13:1987;418-427.
28. Van Liere, D.W., 1991. Function and organisation of dustbathing in laying hens. PhD Thesis. Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
29. Welker W.I. 'Free' vs. 'forced' exploration of a novel situation by rats. Psychological Reports. 3:1957;95-108.
30. Wemelsfelder, F., Birke, L., 1997. Environmental challenge. In: Appleby, M.C., Hughes, B.O. (Eds.), Animal Welfare. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 35-47.
31. Wood-Gush D.G.M., Vestergaard K. The seeking of novelty and its relation to play. Anim. Behav. 42:1991;599-606.