Health and Production in Improved Cage Designs

Poultry Science

Volumn 77, Issue 12, 1998, Pages 1820-1827

  Tauson, R ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Health; Housing system; Layer; Modified cages; Welfare

Indexed keywords

AVES;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL HOUSING; ANIMAL WELFARE; CHICKEN; EGG LAYING; FEMALE; REVIEW;

ANIMAL WELFARE; ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CHICKENS; FEMALE; HOUSING, ANIMAL; OVIPOSITION;

EID: 0032239482     PISSN: 00325791     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ps/77.12.1820     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Abrahamsson, P., and R. Tauson, 1993. Effect of perches at different positions in conventional cages for laying hens. Acta Agric. Scand., Sect. A, Anim. Sci. 43:228-235.
2. Abrahamsson, P., and R. Tauson, 1995. Aviary systems and conventional cages for laying hens. Effects on production, egg quality, health and bird location in three hybrids. Acta Agric. Scand., Sect. A, Anim. Sci. 45:191-203.
3. Abrahamsson, P., R. Tauson, and M. C. Appleby, 1995. Performance of four hybrids of laying hens in modified and conventional cages. Acta Agric. Scand., Sect. A, Anim. Sci. 45:286-296.
4. Abrahamsson, P., R. Tauson, and M. C. Appleby, 1996. Behaviour, health and integument of four hybrids of laying hens in modified and conventional cages. Br. Poult. Sci. 37:521-540.
5. Appleby, M. C., 1993. Should cages for laying hens be banned or modified? Anim. Welfare 2:67-80.
6. Appleby, M. C., and B. O. Hughes, 1995. The Edinburgh Modified Cage for laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 36:707-718.
7. Appleby, M. C., S. F. Smith, and B. O. Hughes, 1992. Individual perching behaviour of laying hens and its effects in cages. Br. Poult. Sci. 33:227-238.
8. Appleby, M. C., S. F. Smith, and B. O. Hughes, 1993. Nesting, dustbathing and perching by laying hens in cages: effects of design on behaviour and welfare. Br. Poult. Sci. 34: 835-847.
9. Bareham, J. R., 1976. A comparison of the behaviour and production of laying hens in experimental and conventional cages. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 2:291-303.
10. Bell, D., 1972. Reverse cage demonstrates striking income advantage. Poult. Dig. 31:326-328.
11. Bell, D., 1995. A case study with laying hens. Pages 307-319 in: Proceedings, Animal Behavior and the Design of Livestock and Poultry Systems International Conference. Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service, Ithaca, NY.
12. Braastad, B. O., 1990. Effects on behaviour and plumage of a key-stimuli floor and a perch in triple cages for laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 27:127-139.
13. Brantas, G. C., K. de Vos-Reesink, and G. Wennrich, 1978. Ethologishe Betrachtungen an Legehennen in Get-away-Käfigen. Arch. Geflügelkd. 42:129-132.
14. Craig, J. V., and J. C. Swanson, 1994. Review. Welfare perspectives on hens kept for egg production. Poultry Sci. 73:921-938.
15. Duncan, E. T., M. C., Appleby and B. O. Hughes, 1992. Effects of perches in laying cages on welfare and production of hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 33:25-35.
16. Elson, H. A., 1976. New ideas on laying cage design - the "Getaway" cage. Pages 1030-1041 in: Proceedings, 5th European Poultry Conference, Malta.
17. Elson, H. A., 1992. Bone breakage in laying hens is an economic and welfare problem. World Poult. 8(1):20-21.
18. Engström, B., and G. Schaller, 1993. Environmental studies of the health of laying hens in relation to housing system. Pages 87-96 in: Proceedings, Fourth European Symposium on Poultry Welfare. C. J. Savory and B. O. Hughes, ed. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare, Potters Bar, UK.
19. Gregory, N. G., and L. J. Wilkins, 1989. Broken bones in domestic fowl: handling and processing damage in end-of-lay battery hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 30:555-562.
20. Hansen, I., 1993. Ethological studies of laying hens in aviaries and cages. Ph.D. Thesis, Agricultural University of Norway, Ås, Norway.
21. Hauser, R., 1988. Lufthygiene in Geflügelställen. Auswirkung auf Mensch und Tier. Report from ETH, Zürich, Switzerland.
22. Hilbrich, P., 1985. History of poultry health. Pages 48-54 in: Proceedings, Second European Symposium on Poultry Welfare. R.-M. Wegner, ed. World's Poultry Science Association, Celle, Germany.
23. Hughes, B. O., 1993. Choice between artificial turf and wire floor as nest sites in individually caged laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 36:327-335.
24. Hughes, B. O., and M. C. Appleby, 1989. Increase in bone strength of spent laying hens housed in modified cages with perches. Vet. Rec. 124:483-484.
25. Hughes, B. O., and A. J. Black, 1974. Preferences of domestic hens for different types of battery cage floor. Br. Poult. Sci. 14:615-619.
26. Hughes, B. O., and A. J. Black, 1976. Battery cage shape: its effects on diurnal feeding pattern, egg shell cracking and feather pecking. Br. Poult. Sci. 17:327-336.
27. Kangro, A., 1993. Air contaminations in buildings for laying hens. Comparisons and analysis of results from nine countries. Department of Farm Buildings, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Lund. Report 88, Lund, Sweden.
28. von Kleist, J., 1985. Leistung und Verhalten von Legehennen im Get-Away-Käfig. Heft 21. Ph.D. Thesis. Institut für Tierzucht und Tierhaltung der Agrarawissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Germany.
29. Kronägg, 1995. Future egg production in Sweden. International seminar on prospects for alternatives to conventional cage keeping of egg laying hens in larger scale in Sweden. Arranged by Kronägg and Swedish Board of Agriculture. Kronägg, Kungsängen, Sweden.
30. Lill, A., 1968. Spatial organisation in small flocks of domestic fowl. Behaviour 32:258-290.
31. Luescher, U. A., J. F. Hurnik, and J. Pos, 1982. New cage design for laying hens. Poultry Sci. 61:606-607.
32. Morgenstern, R., and C. Lobsiger, 1993. Health of laying hens in alternative systems in practice. Pages 81-86 in: Proceedings, Fourth European Symposium on Poultry Welfare. C. J. Savory and B. O. Hughes, ed. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare, Potters Bar, UK.
33. van Niekerk, T.G.C.M., and B.F.J. Reuvekamp, 1995. Recent results of the research on alternative cages in the Netherlands. Pages 49-55 in: Future Egg Production in Sweden. International seminar on prospects for alternatives to conventional cage keeping of egg laying hens in larger scale in Sweden. Arranged by Kronägg and Swedish Board of Agriculture. Kronägg, Kungsängen, Sweden.
34. Oester, H., 1994. Different types of perches and their influence of the development of bumble feet in laying hens. Arch. Geflügelkd. 58:231-238.
35. Rauch, H. W., 1994. Results and experiences with laying hens in Get-away cages. Pages 63-73 in: Modified Cages for Laying Hens. C. M. Sherwin ed. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare, Porters Bar, U.K.
36. Sherwin, C. M., 1994. Modified Cages for Laying Hens. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare, Potters Bar, U.K.
37. Sherwin, C. M., and C. J. Nicol, 1992. Behaviour and production of laying hens in three prototypes of cages incorporating nests. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 35:41-54.
38. Sherwin, C. M., and C. J. Nicol, 1993. Factors influencing floor-laying by hens in modified cages. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 36:211-222.
39. Siegwart, N., 1990. Ursache und Pathogenese von Fussballengeschwüren bei Legehennen. 2. Zwischenbericht. Report from Universität Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
40. Tanaka, T., and J. F. Hurnik, 1992. Comparison of behaviour and performance of laying hens housed in battery cages and an aviary. Poultry Sci. 71:235-243.
41. Tauson, R., 1978. Feed waste by caged layers. 1. A method of estimating the technical feed waste in different cages and feeding systems. Swedish J. Agric. Res. 9:83-93.
42. Tauson, R., 1984a. Plumage conditions in SCWL laying hens kept in conventional cages of different designs. Acta Agric. Scand. 34:221-230.
43. Tauson, R., 1984b. Effects of a perch in conventional cages for laying hens. Acta Agric. Scand. 34:193-209.
44. Tauson, R., 1985. Mortality in laying hens caused by differences in cage design. Acta Agric. Scand. 35:165-174.
45. Tauson, R., 1986a. Technical environment for caged laying hens. Ph.D. Thesis. Report No. 154. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
46. Tauson, R., 1986b. Avoiding excessive growth of claws in caged laying hens. Acta Agric. Scand. 36:95-106.
47. Tauson, R., and P. Abrahamsson, 1994a. Foot and skeletal disorders in laying hens. Effects of perch design, hybrid, housing systems and stocking density. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. A, Anim. Sci. 44:110-119.
48. Tauson, R., and P. Abrahamsson, 1994b. Effects on production, health and behaviour in three SCWL strains in an EMC model in comparison with other modified and conventional cages, Pages 41-53 in: Modified Cages for Laying Hens. C. M. Sherwin, ed. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare, Potters Bar, UK.
49. Tauson, R., and P. Abrahamsson, 1995. Production and health in light white and medium brown hens in modified and conventional cages. Pages 57-64 in: Future Egg Production in Sweden. International seminar on prospects for alternatives to conventional cage keeping of egg laying hens in larger scale in Sweden. Arranged by Kronägg and Swedish Board of Agriculture. Kronägg, Kungsängen, Sweden.
50. Tauson, R., and L. Jansson, 1988. Effects on laying hens of additional features in cage design, Pages 1114-1115 in: Proceedings, XVIII World's Poultry Congress, Nagoya, Japan.
51. Tauson, R., and S. A. Svensson, 1980. Influence of plumage condition on the hens feed requirement. Swedish J. Agric. Res. 10:35-39.
52. Tauson, R., L. Jansson, and P. Abrahamsson, 1992. Studies on alternative housing systems for laying hens in Sweden at the Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, March 1988-October 1991. Report 209. Uppsala, Sweden.
53. Wegner, R.-M., 1989. Experience with the getaway cage system. World's Poult. Sci. J. 46:41-47.