Building a validity argument for the community of inquiry survey instrument

Internet and Higher Education

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 104-111

  Bangert, Art W ^a  

^a MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Community of inquiry model; Community of inquiry model survey; Instrument development

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY OF INQUIRY; COMMUNITY OF INQUIRY MODEL; COMMUNITY OF INQUIRY MODEL SURVEY; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS; EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE; EVALUATION TOOL; EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS; EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS; GRADUATE STUDENTS; INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT; ONLINE COURSE; POPULATION MODEL; STUDENT RESPONSE; SURVEY INSTRUMENTS; THREE-FACTOR MODEL;

TEACHING;

SURVEYS;

EID: 68749098116     PISSN: 10967516     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing (1999), Authors, Washington, DC
2. Arbaugh J.B. An empirical verification of the community of inquiry framework. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 11 1 (2007) 73-85
3. Arbaugh J.B., Cleveland-Innes M., Diaz S.R., Garrison R.D., Ice P., Richardson J.C., and Swan K.P. Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the Community of Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education 11 (2008) 133-136
4. Arbaugh J.B., and Hwang A. Does "teaching presence" exist in online MBA courses?. Internet and Higher Education 9 (2006) 9-21
5. Arbaugh J.B., and Rau B.L. A study of the disciplinary, structural, and behavioral effects on course outcomes in online MBA courses. Decisions Sciences Journal of Innovative Education 5 10 (2007) 65-95
6. Bangert A.W. The development of an instrument for assessing online teaching effectiveness. The Journal of Educational Computing Research 35 3 (2006) 227-244
7. Bangert A.W. The effects of social presence and teaching presence on the quality of critical inquiry for a web-based statistics course. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 20 1 (2008) 34-61
8. Bentler P.M. On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin 112 (1992) 400-404
9. Billings D.M. A framework for assessing outcomes and practices in web-based courses in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education 39 2 (2000) 60-67
10. Birnbaum M. Evaluating the assessment: Sources of evidence for quality assurance. Studies in Educational Evaluation 33 (2007) 29-49
11. Bronack S., Reidl R., and Tashner J. Learning in the zone: A constructivist framework for distance education in a 3-dimensional virtual world. Interactive Learning Environments 14 3 (2006) 219-232
12. Browne M.W., and Cudek R. Alternative ways of assessing model ®t. In: Bollen K.A., and Long J.S. (Eds). Testing structural equation models (1993), Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA 136-162
13. Byrne B.M. Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications and programming (1998), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
14. Chickering A.W., and Erhmann S.C. Implementing the seven principles: Technology as lever. AAHE Bulletin 49 2 (1996) 3-6
15. Chickering A.W., and Gamson Z.F. Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin 39 7 (1987, March) 3-7
16. Cronbach L.J. Test validation. In: Thorndike R.L. (Ed). Educational measurement. (2nd ed.) (1971), American Council on Education, Washington, DC 443-507
17. Dewey J. How we think (1933), Heath, Boston
18. Fabrigar L.R., Wenger D.T., MacCallum R.C., and Strahan E.J. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods 4 3 (1999) 272-299
19. Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS for windows (2000), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
20. Garrison D.R., Anderson T., and Archer W. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education 2 2-3 (2000) 87-105
21. Garrison D.R., Anderson T., and Archer W. Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education 15 1 (2001) 7-23
22. Garrison D.R., and Arbaugh J.B. Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. Internet and Higher Education 10 (2007) 157-172
23. Garrison D.R., and Cleveland-Innes M. Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. The American Journal of Distance Education 19 3 (2005) 133-148
24. Garrison D.R., Cleveland-Innes M., and Fung T. Student role adjustment in online communities of inquiry: Model and instrument validation. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 8 2 (2004) 61-74
25. Garrison R.D., and Vaughn N.D. Blended learning in higher education. Framework, principles, and guidelines (2007), Josey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
26. Gunawardena N.C., and Zittle F. Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education 11 3 (1997) 8-26
27. Hacker D.J., and Niederhauser D.S. Promoting deep and durable learning in the online classroom. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 84 (2000) 53-63
28. Jöreskog K.G., and Sörbom D. LISREL (version 8.51) [Computer Software] (2001), Scientific Software, Inc, Chicago
29. Kane M.T. Terminology, emphasis, and utility in validation. Educational Researcher 37 2 (2007) 76-82
30. Kanuka H., and Anderson T. Online social interchange, discord and knowledge construction. Journal of Distance Education 13 1 (1998) 57-75
31. MacCallum R.C., Browne M.W., and Sugarwara H.M. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods 1 2 (1996) 130-149
32. Macknight C.B. Teaching critical thinking through online discussions. Educase Quarterly 23 (2000) 38-41
33. McCombs B.L., and Vakili D. A learner-centered framework for e-learning. Teachers College Record 107 (2005) 1582-1600
34. Picciano A.G. Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 6 1 (2003) 21-40
35. Richardson J.C., and Swan K. Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 7 1 (2003) 68-88
36. Rourke L., and Anderson T. Validity in quantitative content analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development 52 1 (2004) 5-18
37. Rovai A.P. Development of an instrument to measure classroom community. The Internet and Higher Education 5 (2002) 197-211
38. Rovai A.P. A constructivist approach to online college learning. Internet and Higher Education 7 2 (2004) 79-93
39. Shea P.J. A study of students' sense of learning community in an online learning environment. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 10 1 (2006) 35-44
40. Shea P.J., and Bidjerano T. Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster "epistemic engagement" and "cognitive presence" in online education. Computers and Education 52 (2008) 543-553
41. Shea P.J., Fredericksen E.E., Pickett A.M., and Pelz W.E. A preliminary investigation of "teaching presence" in the SUNY learning network. In: Bourne J., and Moore J.C. (Eds). Elements of quality online education: Practice direction Vol. 4 (2003), Sloan Center for Online Education, Needham, MA 279-312
42. Shea P.J., Pickett A.M., and Pelz W.E. Enhancing student satisfaction through faculty development: The importance of teaching presence. In: Bourne J., and Moore J.C. (Eds). Elements of quality online education: Into the mainstream Vol. 5 (2004), Sloan Center for Online Education, Needham, MA 39-59
43. Stevens J.P. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. (4th ed.) (2002), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
44. Swan K., and Shih L. On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 9 3 (2005) 115-136
45. Vaughn D., and Garrison R.D. Creating cognitive presence is a blended faculty development community. Internet and Higher Education 8 2005 (2005) 1-12