The development of an instrument for assessing online teaching effectiveness

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 227-244

  Bangert, Arthur W ^a  

^a MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547546220     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/B3XP-5K61-7Q07-U443     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abrami, P. C., d'Appollonia, S., & Cohen, P. A. (1990). Validity of student ratings of instruction: What we know and what we do not. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 219-231.
2. Abrami, P. C., d'Apollonia, S., & Rosenfield, S. (1997). The dimensionality of student ratings of instruction: What we know and what we do not. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), Effective teaching in higher education: Research and practice (pp. 321-367). New York: Agathon.
3. Aleamoni, L. M. (1978). Development and factorial validation of the Arizona Course/ Instructor Evaluation Questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 1063-1067.
4. Aleamoni, L. M. (1999). Student rating myths versus research facts from 1924 to 1998. Journal of Personal Evaluation in Education, 13(2), 153-166.
5. Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7. Bangert, A. W. (2004). The seven principles of effecting teaching: A framework for evaluating on-line teaching. The Internet and Higher Education, 7, 217-232.
8. Bentler, P. M. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 419-456.
9. Bentler, P. M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 400-404.
10. Billings, D. M. (2000). A framework for assessing outcomes and practices in Web-based courses in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 39(2), 60-67.
11. Bonk, C. J., & Cunningham, D. J. (1998). Searching for learner-centered, constructivist, and sociocultural components of collaborative educational learning tools. In C. J. Bonk & K. S. King (Eds.), Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship, and discourse (pp. 25-50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Byrne. B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Cashin, W. E., & Downey, R. G. (1992). Using global student rating items for summative evaluation. Journal of Educational. Psychology, 84, 563-572.
14. Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276.
15. Chickering, A. W., & Erhmann, S. C. (1996). Implementing the seven principles: Technology as lever. AAHE Bulletin, 49(2), 3-6.
16. Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987, March). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3-7.
17. Fabrigar, L. R., Wenger, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272-299.
18. Feldman, K. A. (1997). Identifying exemplary teachers and teaching: Evidence from student ratings. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), Effective teaching in higher education: Research and practice (pp. 321-367). New York: Agathon.
19. Field, A. (2000). Discovering statistics using SPSS for windows. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Hacker, D. J., & Niederhauser, D. S. (2000). Promoting deep and durable learning in the online classroom. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 84, 53-63.
21. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
22. Jonassen, D. H. (2003). The vain, quest for a unified theory of learning. Educational Technology, 43, 5-8.
23. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2001). LISREL (version 8.51) [Computer Software]. Chicago: Scientific Software, Inc.
24. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Larkin, K. C. (1984). Relation of self-efficacy expectations to academic achievement and persistence. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 356-362.
25. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugarwara. H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-149.
26. Magnani, L., Nersessian, N. J., & Thagard, P. (1999). Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery. New York: Kluwer Acdemic/Plenum.
27. Marsh, H. W. (1982). SEEQ: A reliable, valid, and useful instrument for collecting students' evaluations of university teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 52, 77-95.
28. Marsh, H. W. (1991). Multidimensional students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness: A test of alternative higher-order structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 285-296.
29. Marsh, H. W. (1997). Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility. American. Psychologist, 52(11), 11.87-97.
30. Marsh, H. W., & Bailey, M. (1993). Multidimensional students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness. A profile analysis. The Journal of Higher Education, 64(1), 1-18.
31. Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. (1993). The use of students' evaluations and an individually structured intervention to enhance university teaching effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 217-251.
32. McCombs, B. A. (2001). What do we know about learners and learning? The learnercentered framework: Bring the educational system into balance. Educational Horizons, 79, 182-193.
33. McCombs, B. A., & Vakili, D. (2005). A learner-centered framework for e-learning. Teachers College Record, 107, 1582-1600.
34. Millis, B. J., & Cottrell, P. G. (1998). Cooperative learning for higher education faculty. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx. Press.
35. Motiwalla, L., & Tello, S. (2000). Distance learning on the Internet: An exploratory study. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(4), 253-264.
36. Pajares, F. (2002). Gender and perceived self-efficacy in self-regulated learning. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 118-125.
37. Partlow, K. M., & Gibbs, W. J. (2003). Indicators of constructivist principles in Internetbased courses. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 14(2), 68-97.
38. Phipps, R. A., & Merisotis, J. P. (2000). Quality on the line: Benchmarks for success in Internet-based distance education. Washington, DC: The Institute for Higher Education. Policy.
39. Pintrich, P. R., & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 41-50.
40. Relan, A., & Gillani, B. B. (1997). Internet-based instruction and the traditional classroom: Similarities and differences. In B. H. Kahn (Ed.), Internet-based instruction (pp. 41-46). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
41. Schunk, D. (1983). Developing children's self-efficacy and skills: The roles of social, comparative information and goal setting. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 76-86.
42. Stevens, J. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Svinicki, M. D. (1999). New directions in learning and motivation. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 80, 5-27.
44. Vye, N. J., Schwartz, D. L., Bransford, J. D., Barron, B. J., Zech, L., & Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1998). SMART environments that support monitoring, reflection, and revision. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 305-346). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.