A preliminary study on the effectiveness of inquiry-based activities for addressing misconceptions of undergraduate engineering students

Education for Chemical Engineers

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 29-41

  Prince, Michael J ^a   Vigeant, Margot A S ^a   Nottis, Katharyn ^a  

^a BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Heat transfer; Misconceptions; Thermodynamics

Indexed keywords

EID: 68749092889     PISSN: 17497728     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ece.2009.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Barnett S., and Ceci M. When and where do we apply what we learn?: a taxonomy for far transfer?. Psychological-Bulletin 128 (2002) 612-637
2. Bernhard, J., 2000, Improving engineering physics teaching-learning from physics education research, in: Physics Teaching in Engineering Education (European Society for Engineering Education, Budapest).
3. Bransford, J., Brown, A. and Cocking, R., 2000, How People Learn: Body, Mind, Experience and School (Commission on Behavioral and Social Science and Education, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.).
4. Byrnes J.P. Cognitive Development and Learning in Instructional Contexts (2008), Pearson, Boston, MA
5. Carlton K. Teaching about heat and temperature. Physics Education 35 (2000) 101
6. Chi M.T.H. Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: why some misconceptions are robust. Journal of the Learning Sciences 14 (2005) 161-199
7. Chi M.T.H., and Roscoe R.D. The processes and challenges of conceptual change. In: Limon M., and Mason L. (Eds). Reconsidering Conceptual Change: Issues in Theory and Practice (2002), Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands 3-27
8. Clough E., and Driver R. A study of consistency in the use of students' conceptual frameworks across different task contexts. Science Education 70 (1986) 473-496
9. de Ton J., and van Joolingen W.R. Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research 68 Summer (2) (1998) 179-201
10. diSessa A.A., Gillespie N.M., and Esterly J.B. Coherence versus fragmentation in the development of the concept of force. Cognitive Science 28 November-December (6) (2004) 843-900
11. Entwistle, N., Tomlinson, P. (Eds.), 2007, Student Learning and University Teaching (British Psychological Society, Leicester, UK).
12. Evans, D., Gary, G., Krause, S., Martin, J., Midkiff, C., Notaros, B., Pavelich, M., Rancour, D., Reed-Rhoads, T., Steif, P., Streveler, R. and Wage, K., 2003, Progress on concept inventory assessment tools, in: Frontiers in Education, Boulder, CO.
13. Felder R., Woods D., Stice J., and Rugarcia A. The future of engineering education: Ii teaching methods that work. Chemical Engineering Education 34 (2000) 26-39
14. Fraenkel J.R., and Wallen N.E. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (2009), McGraw-Hill, New York
15. Georghiades P. Beyond conceptual change learning in science education: focusing on transfer. Durability and metacognition. Educational Research 42 (2000) 119-139
16. Guzzetti J., Snyder E., Glass G., and Gamas W. Promoting conceptual change in science: a comparative meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education. Reading Research Quarterly 28 (1993) 116-159
17. Hake R. Interactive-engagement vs. traditional methods: a six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics 66 (1998) 64
18. Hakkarainen O., and Ahtee M. The durability of conceptual change in learning the concept of weight in the case of a pulley in balance. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 5 (2006) 461-482
19. Hausfather S. It's time for a conceptual change. Science and Children November/December (1992) 22
20. Huck S.W., and Cormier W.H. Reading Statistics and Research (1996), Harper Collins, New York
21. Inquiry Descriptions From the Exploratorium Institute Inquiry Forum, 2004.
22. Jacobi, A., Martin, J., Mitchell, J. and Newell, Ty, 2003, A concept inventory for heat transfer, in: Frontiers in Education, Boulder, CO.
23. Jasien P.G., and Oberem E. Understanding of elementary concepts in heat and temperature among college students and K-12 teachers. Journal of Chemical Education 79 (2002) 889-895
24. Johnson D., Johnson R., and Smith K. Cooperative learning returns to college: what evidence is there that it works?. Change 30 (1998) 26-35
25. Laws P., Sokoloff D., and Thornton R. Promoting active learning using the results of physics education research. UniServe Science News (1999) 13
26. Lightman A., and Sadler P. Teacher predictions versus actual student gains. The Physics Teacher 31 (1993) 162
27. Mazur E. Peer Instruction: A User's Manual (1997), Prentice Hall, New Jersey
28. Midkiff, K., Litzinger, T. and Evans, D., 2001, Development of engineering thermodynamics concept inventory instruments, in: Frontiers in Education, Reno, NV.
29. Miller R.L., Streveler R.A., Olds B.M., Chi M.T.H., Nelson M.A., and Geist M.R. Misconceptions about rate processes: preliminary evidence for the importance of emergent conceptual schemas in thermal and transport sciences. ASEE National Conference Proceedings. Chicago (2006)
30. Miller R., Streveler R., Nelson M.A., Geist M.R., and Olds B. Concept inventories meet cognitive psychology: using beta testing as a mechanism for identifying engineering student misconceptions. ASEE National Conference. Portland, OR (2005)
31. Nottis, K., Prince, M. and Vigeant, M., Addressing misconceptions about heat transfer in undergraduate chemical engineering instruction, US-China Education Review, submitted for publication.
32. Nottis, K., Prince, M. and Vigeant, M., 2009. Building an understanding of heat transfer concepts in undergraduate chemical engineering courses, US-China Education Review, under review.
33. Novak J.D. A Theory of Education (1977), Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY
34. Novak J.D. Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics (1987), Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY
35. Olds B., Streveler R., Miller R., and Nelson M.A. Preliminary results from the development of a concept inventory in thermal and transport sciences. ASEE National Conference. Salt Lake City, UT (2004)
36. Perkins D. The many faces of constructivism. Educational Leadership 57 (1999) 6-11
37. Planinic M., Krsnik R., Pecina P., and Susac A. Overview and comparison of basic teaching techniques that promote conceptual change in students. European Physics Education Conference. Bad Honnef, Njemacka (2007)
38. Popham W.J., and Sirotnik K.A. Understanding Statistics in Education (1992), F.E. Peacock, New York
39. Prince M. Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education 93 (2004) 223-231
40. Prince M., and Felder R. Inductive teaching and learning methods: definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education 95 (2006) 123-138
41. Prince M., and Felder R. The many faces of inductive teaching and learning. Journal of College Science Teaching 36 (2006) 14-20
42. Prince M., and Vigeant M. Using inquiry-based activities to promote understanding of critical engineering concepts. ASEE National Conference. Chicago, IL (2006)
43. Prince, M., Vigeant, M. and Nottis, K., Assessing Misconceptions of undergraduate engineering students in the thermal sciences, International Journal of Engineering Education, under review.
44. Redish E., Saul J., and Steinberg R. On the effectiveness of active-engagement microcomputer-based laboratories. American Journal of Physics 65 (1997) 45
45. Reinders, D., 2008, Students' and Teachers' Conceptions and Science Education.
46. Reiner M., Slotta J.D., Chi M.T.H., and Resnick L.B. Naive physics reasoning: a commitment to substance-based concepts. Cognition & Instruction 18 (2000) 1-34
47. Singley K., and Anderson J. The Transfer of Cognitive Skill (1989), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
48. Smith J.P., diSessa A.A., and Roschelle J. Misconceptions reconceived: a constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. Journal of the Learning Sciences 3 (1993) 115-163
49. Steif, P., 2003, Comparison between performance on a concept inventory and solving of multifaceted problems, in: Frontiers in Education, Boulder, CO.
50. Stone, A., Allen, K., Reed-Rhoads, T., Murphy, T., Shehab, R. and Saha, C., 2003, The statistics concept inventory: a pilot study, in: Frontiers in Education, Boulder, CO.
51. Streveler R.T., Litzinger T., Miller R., and Steif P. Learning conceptual knowledge in the engineering sciences: overview and future research directions. Journal of Engineering Education 97 (2008) 279-294
52. Streveler, R., Olds, B., Miller, R. and Nelson, M., 2003, Using a Delphi study to identify the most difficult concepts for students to master in thermal and transport science, in: American Society of Engineering Education National Meeting, ASEE. Nashville, TN.
53. Suping S. Conceptual Change Among Students in Science (2003), ERIC Digest
54. Swaak J., Van Joolingen W.R., and de Jong T. Supporting simulation-based learning; the effects of model progression and assignments on definitional and intuitive knowledge. Learning and Instruction 8 June (3) (1998) 235-252
55. Thacker B.E.K., Trefz K., and Lea S. Comparing problem solving performance of physics students in inquiry-based and traditional introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics 62 (1994) 627
56. Thomas M.F., Malaquas I., Valente M., and Antunes M. An attempt to overcome alternative conceptions related to heat and temperature. Physics Education 30 (1995) 19-26
57. Web resource, Foundation coalition introduction to concept inventories, Last accessed December 31, 2001.
58. Web resource, Activity based physics tutorials at Umd, Last accessed May 17, 2004.