Recognition of self-generated actions from kinematic displays of drawing

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 456-465

  Knoblich, Günther ^a   Prinz, Wolfgang ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EGO; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PERCEPTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECOGNITION; TIME PERCEPTION;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; CUES; EGO; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SIZE PERCEPTION; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 0004887550     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.2.456     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Babcock, M. K., & Freyd, J. J. (1988). Perception of dynamic information in static handwritten forms. American Journal of Psychology, 101, 111-130.
2. Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., Pook, P. K., & Rao, R. P. N. (1997). Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 20, 723-767.
3. Barclay, C. D., Cutting, J. E., & Kozlowski, L. T. (1978). Temporal and spatial factors in gait perception that influence gender recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 145-152.
4. Beardsworth, T., & Buckner, T. (1981). The ability to recognize oneself from a video recording of one's movements without seeing one's body. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18, 19-22.
5. Bertenthal, B. I., Proffitt, D. R., Kramer, S. J., & Spetner, N. B. (1987). Infants' encoding of kinetic displays varying in relative coherence. Developmental Psychology, 23, 171-178.
6. Blake, R. (1993). Cats perceive biological motion. Psychological Science, 4, 54-57.
7. Blakemore, S. J., Wolpert, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (1998). Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 635-640.
8. Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257-271.
9. Cutting, J. E., & Kozlowski, L. T. (1977). Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 9, 353-356.
10. Cutting, J. E., Proffitt, D. R., & Kozlowski, L. T. (1978). A biomechanical invariant for gait perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 357-372.
11. Daprati, E., Franck, N., Georgieff, N., Proust, J., Pacherie, E., Dalery, J., & Jeannerod, M. (1997). Looking for the agent: An investigation into consciousness of action and self-consciousness in schizophrenic patients. Cognition, 65, 71-86.
12. Decety, J., & Grèzes, J. (1999). Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 172-178.
13. Dittrich, W. H., Troscianko, T., Lea, S., & Morgan, D. (1996). Perception of emotion from dynamic point-light displays represented in dance. Perception, 25, 727-738.
14. Flores d'Arcais, G. B. (1994). Order of strokes writing as a cue for retrieval in reading Chinese characters. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6, 337-355.
15. Fourneret, P., & Jeannerod, M. (1998). Limited conscious monitoring of motor performance in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 36, 1133-1140.
16. Fox, R., & McDaniel, C. (1982). The perception of biological motion by human infants. Science, 218, 486-487.
17. Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119, 593-609.
18. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
19. Goodnow, J. J., & Levine, R. A. (1973). "The grammar of action": Sequence and syntax in children's copying. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 83-98
20. Hoffmann, J., & Koch, I. (1998). Implicit learning of loosely defined structures. In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.), Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 161-199). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Hollerbach, J. M. (1981). An oscillation theory of handwriting. Biological Cybernetics, 39, 139-156.
22. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (in press). The theory of event coding: A framework for perception and action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
23. Jeannerod, M. (1999). The 25th Bartlett Lecture: To act or not to act: Perspectives on the representation of actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 1-29.
24. Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 201-211.
25. Johansson, G. (1976). Spatio-temporal differentiation and integration in visual motion perception: An experimental and theoretical analysis of calculus-like functions in visual data processing. Psychological Research, 38, 379-393.
26. Kozlowski, L. T., & Cutting, J. E. (1977). Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display. Perception & Psychophysics, 21, 575-580.
27. Lacquaniti, F., Terzuolo, C., & Viviani, P. (1983). The law relating the kinematic and figurai aspects of drawing movements. Acta Psychologica 54, 115-130.
28. Liberman, A. M., & Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 1-36.
29. MacKay, D. (1987). The organization of perception and action. New York: Springer.
30. Mather, G., & West, S. (1993). Recognition of animal locomotion from dynamic point-light displays. Perception, 22, 759-766.
31. Meulenbroek, R. G. J., Rosenbaum, D. A., Thomassen, A. J. W. M., Loukopoulos, L. D., & Vaughan, J. (1996). Adaptation of a reaching model to handwriting: How different effectors can produce the same written output, and other results. Psychological Research, 59, 64-74.
32. Mottet, D., Bardy, G. B., & Athènes, S. (1994). A note on data smoothing for movement analysis: The relevance of a nonlinear method. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 51-55.
33. Oram, M. W., & Perrett, D. I. (1994). Responses of anterior superior temporal polysensory (STPa) neurons to "biological motion" stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 99-116.
34. Poizner, H., Bellugi, U., & Lutes Driscoll, V. (1981). Perception of American Sign Language in dynamic point-light displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 430-440.
35. Prinz, W. (1992). Why don't we perceive our brain states? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 1-20.
36. Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129-154.
37. Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1998). Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences, 21, 188-194.
38. Rosenbaum, D. A., Loukopoulos, L. D., Meulenbroek, R. G. J., Vaughan, J., & Engelbrecht, S. E. (1995). Planning reaches by evaluating stored postures. Psychological Review, 102, 28-67.
39. Runeson, S. (1994). Perception of biological motion: The KSD-principle and the implications of a distal versus proximal approach. In G. Jansson & S. S. Bergstroem (Eds.), Perceiving events and objects: Resources for ecological psychology (pp. 383-405). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Runeson, S., & Frykholm, G. (1981). Visual perception of lifted weight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 733-740.
41. Runeson, S., & Frykholm, G. (1983). Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person-and-action perception: Expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 585-615.
42. Shaw R. E., Kadar, E., Sim, M., & Repperger, D. W. (1992). The intentional spring: A strategy for modeling systems that learn to perform intentional acts. Journal of Motor Behavior, 24, 3-28.
43. Shaw, R. E., & Kinsella-Shaw, J. (1988). Ecological mechanics: A physical geometry for intentional constraints. Human Movement Science, 7, 155-200.
44. Stelmach, G. E., & Teulings, H. L. (1983). Response characteristics of prepared and restructured handwriting. Acta Psychologica, 54, 51-67.
45. Turvey, M. T., Shaw, R. E., Reed, E. S., & Mace, W. M. (1981). Ecological laws of perceiving and acting: In reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn (1981). Cognition, 9, 237-304.
46. Van Sommers, P. (1984). Drawing and cognition: Descriptive and experimental studies of graphic production processes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
47. Viviani P., Baud-Bovy, G., & Redolfi, M. (1997). Perceiving and tracking kinesthetic stimuli: Further evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1232-1252.
48. Viviani, P., & Schneider, R. (1991). A developmental study of the relationship between geometry and kinematics in drawing movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 198-218.
49. Viviani, P., & Stucchi, N. (1989). The effect of movement velocity on form perception: Geometric illusions in dynamic displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 266-274.
50. von Holst, E. (1954). Relations between the central nervous system and the peripheral organs. British Journal of Animal Behaviour, 2, 89-94.
51. Wegner D. M., & Wheatley, T. (1999). Apparent mental confusion: Sources of the experience of will. American Psychologist. 54, 480-492.
52. Wolff, W. (1931). Zuordnung individueller Gangmerkmale zur Individual-Charakteristik [Assignment of individual attributes of gait to the individual characteristic], Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für angewandte Psychologie, 58, 108-122.