Predicting the behavioral intention to use enterprise resource planning systems: An exploratory extension of the technology acceptance model

Management Research News

Volumn 32, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 597-613

  Calisir, Fethi ^a   Altin Gumussoy, Cigdem ^a   Bayram, Armagan ^a  

^a ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Manufacturing systems; Systems analysis; User studies

Indexed keywords

EID: 68749089654     PISSN: 01409174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/01409170910965215     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Adams, D.A., Nelson, R.R. and Todd, P.A. (1992), “Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 227-247.
2. Agarwal, R. and Karahanna, E. (2000), “Time flies when you are having fun cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 665-694.
3. Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. (1998), “A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 204-215.
4. Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. (1999), “Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies?”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 361-391.
5. Ajzen, I. (1991), “The theory of planned behavior”, Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50, pp. 179-211.
6. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1980), Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
7. Al-Mashari, M., Al-Mudimigh, A. and Zairi, M. (2003), “Enterprise resource planning: a taxonomy of critical factors”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 146, pp. 352-364.
8. Amoako-Gyampah, K. (2007), “Perceived usefulness, user involvement and behavioral intention: an empirical study of ERP implementation”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 23, pp. 1232-48.
9. Amoako-Gyampah, K. and Salam, A.F. (2004), “An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment”, Information & Management, Vol. 41 No. 6, pp. 731-745.
10. AMR Research (2005), “The market analytic report: enterprise resource planning, 2004-2009”.
11. Anderson, J.C. and Gerbing, D.W. (1988), “Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two step approach”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 103 No. 3, pp. 411-423.
12. Bagozzi, R.P. and Philips, L.W. (1982), “Representing and testing organizational theories: a holistic construal”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 27, pp. 459-489.
13. Bagozzi, R.P., Yi, Y. and Philips, L.W. (1991), “Assessing construct validity in organizational research”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 36, pp. 421-458.
14. Baker, E.W., Al-Gahtani, S.S. and Hubona, G.S. (2007), “The effects of gender and age on new technology implementation in a developing country: testing the theory of planned behavior”, Information Technology & People, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 352-375.
15. Basoglu, N., Daim, T. and Kerimoglu, O. (2007), “Organizational adoption of enterprise resource planning systems: a conceptual framework”, The Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 73-97.
16. Behesthi, H.M. (2006), “What managers should know about ERP/ERPII”, Management Research News, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 184-193.
17. Blackwell, S.L.S. and Charles, A.C. (2006), “Ready, set, go: examining student readiness to use ERP technology”, Journal of Management Development, Vol. 25 No. 8, pp. 795-805.
18. Calisir, F. and Calisir, F. (2004), “The relation of interface usability characteristics, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use to end-user satisfaction with enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 20, pp. 505-515.
19. Chang, S. and Tung, F. (2008), “An empirical investigation of students' behavioural intentions to use the online learning course websites”, British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 71-83.
20. Chau, P.Y.K. and Hu, P.J.H. (2001), “Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model comparison approach”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 699-719.
21. Choi, H., Choi, M.S., Kim, J.W. and Yu, H.S. (2003), “An empirical study on the adoption of information appliances with a focus on interactive TV”, Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 161-183.
22. Chung, S.H. and Snyder, C.A. (2000), “ERP adoption: a technological evolution approach”, International Journal of Agile Management Systems, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 24-32.
23. Cronbach, L.J. (1984), Essentials of Psychological Testing, Harper & Row, New York, NY.
24. Davis, F.D. (1989), “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 319-339.
25. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. and Warshaw, P.R. (1989), “User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models”, Management Science, Vol. 35 No. 8, pp. 982-1003.
26. Dishaw, M.T. and Strong, D.M. (1999), “Extending the technology acceptance model with task technology fit constructs”, Information and Management, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 9-21.
27. Elbertsen, L., Benders, J. and Nijssen, N. (2006), “ERP use: exclusive or complemented?” Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 106 No. 6, pp. 811-824.
28. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
29. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981), “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, pp. 39-50.
30. Gefen, D. (2003), “TAM or just plain habit: a look at experienced online shoppers”, Journal of End User Computing, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 1-13.
31. Gefen, D. (2004), “What makes an ERP implementation relationship worthwhile: linking trust mechanisms and ERP usefulness”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 263-288.
32. Gefen, D. and Straub, D. (1997), “Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail: an extension to the technology acceptance model”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 389-400.
33. Gopi, M. and Ramayah, T. (2007), “Applicability of theory of planned behavior in predicting intention to trade online some evidence from a developing country”, International Journal of Emerging Markets, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 348-360.
34. Gumaer, R. (1996), “Beyond ERP and MRP II”, IIE Solutions, Vol. 28, pp. 32-35.
35. Gupta, A. (2000), “Enterprise resource planning: the emerging organizational value systems”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 100 No. 3, pp. 114-118.
36. Guriting, P. and Ndubisi, N.O. (2006), “Borneo online banking evaluating customer perceptions and behavioral intention”, Management Research News, Vol. 29 Nos. 1-2, pp. 6-15.
37. Granebring, A. and Revay, P. (2005), “Enterprise resource planning competence centres: a case study”, Kybernetes, Vol. 34 Nos. 9-10, pp. 1551-62.
38. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C. (1998), Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
39. Harrison, A.W. and Rainer, R.K., Jr. (1992), “The influence of individual differences on skill in end-user computing”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 93-111.
40. Hu, P.J., Chau, P.Y.K., Sheng, O.R.L. and Tam, K.Y. (1999), “Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 91-112.
41. Hung, S. and Chang, C. (2005), “User acceptance of WAP services: a test of competing theories”, Computer Standards and Interfaces, Vol. 27, pp. 359-370.
42. Igbaria, M. and Chakrabarti, A. (1990), “Computer anxiety and attitudes towards microcomputer use”, Behavior and Information Technology, Vol. 9, pp. 229-241.
43. Johnny, C.F. and Bolloju, N. (2005), “Explaining the intentions to share and reuse knowledge in the context of IT service operations”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 9 No. 6, pp. 30-41.
44. Jöreskog, K.J. and Sörbom D. (1993), LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with SIMPLIS Command Language, Lawrence Erlbaum, London.
45. Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W. and Chervany, N.L. (1999), “Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 183-213.
46. Law, C.C.H. and Ngai, E.W.T. (2007), “ERP systems adoption: an exploratory study of the organizational factors and impacts of ERP success”, Information & Management, Vol. 44, pp. 418-432.
47. Lee, Y. (2006), “An empirical investigation into factors influencing the adoption of an e-learning system”, Online Information Review, Vol. 30 No. 5, pp. 517-541.
48. Legris, P., Ingham, J. and Collerette, P. (2003), “Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model”, Information & Management, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 191-204.
49. Leonard, L.N.K., Cronan, T.P. and Kreie, J. (2004), “What influences IT ethical behavior intentions, planned behavior, reasoned action, perceived importance, or individual characteristics?”, Information and Management, Vol. 42, pp. 143-158.
50. Liao, S., Shao, Y.P., Wang, H. and Chen, A. (1999), “The adoption of virtual banking: an empirical study”, International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 63-74.
51. Lin, J.C.C. and Lu, H. (2000), “Towards an understanding of the behavioral intention to use a web site”, International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 197-208.
52. Lymperopoulos, C. and Chaniotakis, I.E. (2005), “Factors affecting acceptance of the internet as a marketing-intelligence tool among employees of Greek bank branches”, International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 23 No. 6, pp. 484-505.
53. Mc Farland, D.J. and Hamilton, D. (2006), “Adding contextual specificity to the technology acceptance model”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 22, pp. 427-447.
54. Mathieson, K., Peacock, E. and Chin, W.W. (2001), “Extending the TAM: the influence of perceived user resources”, Advances in Information Systems, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 86-112.
55. Moon, J.W. and Kim, Y.G. (2001), “Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web context”, Information & Management, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 217-230.
56. Moore, G.C. and Benbasat, I. (1991), “Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting and innovation technology innovation”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, pp. 192-222.
57. Peterson, W.J., Gelman, L. and Cooke, D.P. (2001), ERP Trends, Conference Board, New York, NY.
58. Poon, W.-C. (2008), “Users' adoption of e-banking services: the Malaysian perspective”, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 59-69.
59. Porter, C.E. and Donthu, N. (2006), “Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine internet usage: the role of perceived access barriers and demographics”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 59, pp. 999-1007.
60. Rogers, E.M. (1995), The Diffusion of Innovation, 4th ed., Free Press, New York, NY.
61. Saade, R. and Bahli, B. (2005), “The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model”, Information Management, Vol. 42, pp. 317-327.
62. Shih, Y. (2006), “The effect of computer self-efficacy on enterprise resource planning usage”, Behaviour & Information Technology, Vol. 25 No. 5, pp. 407-411.
63. Soh, C., Kien, S. and Tay-Yap, J. (2000), “Cultural fits and misfits: is ERP a universal solution?”, Communication of the ACM, Vol. 43 No. 4, pp. 47-51.
64. Somers, T.M. and Nelson, K.G. (2004), “A taxonomy of players and activities across the ERP project life cycle”, Information and Management, Vol. 41, pp. 257-278.
65. Sonnenwald, D.H., Maglaughlin, K.L. and Whitton, M.C. (2003), “Using innovation diffusion theory to guide collaboration technology evaluation: work in progress”, Proceedings of the IEEE 10th International Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE'01), available at: www.adm.hb.se/personal/dis/ wetice-2001.pdf (assessed 1 January).
66. Szajna, B. (1996), “Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model”, Management Science, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 85-92.
67. Taylor, S. and Todd, P.A. (1995 a), “Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 561-570.
68. Taylor, S. and Todd, P.A. (1995 b), “Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models”, Information System Research, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 144-176.
69. Tung, F., Chang, S. and Chou, C. (2008), “An extension of trust and TAM model with IDT in the adoption of the electronic logistics information system in HIS in the medical industry”, International Journal of Medical Informatics, Vol. 77, pp. 324-335.
70. Umble, E.J., Haft, R.R. and Umble, M.M. (2003), “Enterprise resource planning: implementation procedures and critical success factors”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 146, pp. 241-257.
71. Venkatesh, V. (2000), “Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 342-365.
72. Venkatesh, V. and Morris, M.G. (2000), “Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 115-139.
73. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. and Davis, F.D. (2003), “User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 425-478.
74. Vijayasarathy, L.R. (2004), “Predicting consumer intentions to use online shopping: the case for an augmented technology acceptance model”, Information & Management, Vol. 41 No. 6, pp. 747-762.
75. Watson, E.E. and Schneider, H. (1998), “Using ERP in education”, Communications of the AIS, Vol. 1 No. 9, pp. 1-48.
76. Wu, J. and Wang, S. (2005), “What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model”, Information Management, Vol. 42, pp. 719-729.
77. Wu, J., Wang, S. and Lin, L. (2007), “Mobile computing acceptance factors in the healthcare industry: a structural equation model”, International Journal of Medicine Informatics, Vol. 76, pp. 67-77.
78. Yi, M.Y., Jackson, J.D., Park, J.S. and Probst, J.C. (2006), “Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: toward an integrative view”, Information & Management, Vol. 43 No. 3, pp. 350-363.
79. Yusuf, Y., Gunasekaran, A. and Abthorpe, M.S. (2004), “Enterprise information systems project implementation: a case study of ERP in Rolls-Royce”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 87, pp. 251-266.