The effect of computer self-efficacy on enterprise resource planning usage

Behaviour and Information Technology

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 407-411

  Shih, Ya Yueh ^a  

^a MINGHSIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Computer efficacy; Enterprise resource planning systems; Structural equation model; Technology acceptance model

Indexed keywords

COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER APPLICATIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PERSONNEL; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

COMPUTER EFFICACY; ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING SYSTEMS; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODEL (SEM); TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM);

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING;

EID: 33746821851     PISSN: 0144929X     EISSN: 13623001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01449290500168103     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. AMOAKO-GYAMPAH, K. and SALAM, A.F., 2004, An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment. Information & Management, 41, pp. 731-745.
2. BAGOZZI, R.P. and HEATHERTON, T.F., 1994, A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: application to self-esteem. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1, pp. 35-67.
3. BANDURA, A., 1977, Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, pp. 191-215.
4. BANDURA, A., 1982, Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, pp. 122-147.
5. BANDURA, A., 1986, Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory (Englewood Cliffs, NI: Prentice Hall).
6. CHOU, H.W., 2001, Effects of training method and computer anxiety on learning performance and self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(1), pp. 51-69.
7. COMPEAU, D.R. and HIGGINS, C.A., 1995, Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19, pp. 189-211.
8. DAVIS, F.D., 1989, Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, pp. 319-339.
9. DAVIS, F.D., BAGOZZI, R.P. and WARSHAW, P.R., 1989, User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, pp. 982-1003.
10. DAVIS, F.D., BAGOZZI, R.P. and WARSHAW, P.R., 1992, Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, pp. 1111-1132.
11. DELONE, W. and McLEAN, E.R., 1992, Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3, pp. 60-95.
12. DENG, X., DOLL, W.J. and TRUONO, D., 2004, Computer self-efficacy in an ongoing use context. Behaviour & Information Technology, 23, pp. 395-412.
13. DISHAW, M.T. and STRONG, D.M., 1999, Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs. Information & Management, 36, pp. 9-21.
14. FISHBEIN, M.A. and AJZEN, I., 1975, Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley).
15. GEFEN, D. and STRAUB, D.W., 1997, Gender differences in perception and adoption of email: an extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Quarterly, 21, pp. 389-400.
16. GIST, M.E., 1987, Self-efficacy: implications for organisational behavioral and human resource management. Academic Management Review, 12, pp. 472-485.
17. GIST, M.E., SCHOWOERER, C. and ROSEN, D., 1989, Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(6), pp. 884-891.
18. HAIR, J.F., ANDERSON, R.E., TATHAM, R.L. and BLACK, W.C., 1995, Multivariate Data Analysis (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).
19. IGBARIA, M. and IIVARI, J., 1995, The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. Omega, 23, pp. 587-605.
20. IGBARIA, M., ZINATELLI, N., CRAGG, P. and CAVAYE, A.M., 1997, Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: a structural equation model. MIS Quarterly, 21, pp. 279-305.
21. JACKSON, C.M., CHOW, S. and LEITCH, R.A., 1997, Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use an information. Decision Sciences, 28, pp. 357-389.
22. JORESKOG, K.G. and SORBOM, D., 1993, LISREL 8: structural equations modeling with the SIMPLES command language (Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International).
23. LAUGHLIN, S.P., 1999, An ERP game plan. Journal of Business Strategy, 20(1), pp. 32-37.
24. LUARN, P. and LIN, H.H., 2005, Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, pp. 873-891.
25. MARAKAS, G.M., YI, M.Y. and JOHNSON, R.D., 1998, The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research information. Information Systems Research, 9, pp. 126-163.
26. NUNALLY, J., 1967, Psychometric Theory (New York: McGraw-Hill).
27. OLIVER, T.A. and SHAPIRO, F., 1993. Self-efficacy and computers. Journal of Computer-Based Interactions, 20, pp. 81-85.
28. SALANOVA, M., GRAU, R.M., CIFRE, E. and LLORENS, S., 2000, Computer training, frequency of usage and burnout: the moderating role of computer self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, pp. 575-590.
29. SHIH, Y.Y., 2004, A case study of the critical success factors in implementing enterprise resource planning. Journal of Ming Hsin Institute of Technology, 30, pp. 159-169.
30. STEIGER, J., 1990, Structural model evaluation and modification: an interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, pp. 173-180.
31. TORKZADEH, G. and VAN DYKE, T.P., 2001, Development and validation of an Internet self-efficacy scale. Behaviour & Information Technology, 20, pp. 275-280.
32. TORKZADEH, G. and VAN DYKE, T.P., 2002, Effects of training on Internet self-efficacy and computer user attitudes. Computer in Human Behavior, 18, pp. 479-494.
33. VENKATESH, V. and DAVIS, F.D., 1996, A model of antecedants of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decision Science, 27(3), pp. 451-481.
34. VENKATESH, V. and DAVIS, F.D., 2000, A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, pp. 186-204.