An empirical study on the adoption of information appliances with a focus on interactive TV

Telematics and Informatics

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 161-183

  Choi, Hun ^a   Choi, Minseok ^a   Kim, Jinwoo ^a   Yu, Hyoshik ^a  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Attitude; Behavioral intention; Information appliance; Interactive TV; Perceived behavioral control; Subjective norm; Technology adoption

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INTERNET; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

INFORMATION APPLIANCES;

VIDEO ON DEMAND;

EID: 0037403357     PISSN: 07365853     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0736-5853(02)00024-2     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Adams D.A., Nelson R., Todd P.A. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly. 1992;227-247.
2. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991;179-211.
3. Babin B.J., Darden W.R., Griffin M. Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research. 20(4):1994;644-656.
4. Bergman E. Information Appliances and Beyond. 2000;Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, NY.
5. Chang M.K., Cheung W. Determinants of the intention to use Internet/WWW at work: A confirmatory study. Information and Management. 39:2001;1-14.
6. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 13(3):1989;319-340.
7. Fazio R.H., Chen J., McDonel E.C., Sherman S.J. attitude accessibility, attitude behavior consistency, and the strength of the object-evaluation association. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 18:1982;339-357.
8. Fishbein M., Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. 1975;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
9. Hennessy J. The future of systems research. Computer. 32(8):1999;27-33.
10. Hirschman E.C., Holbrook M.B. Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing. 46(1):1982;92-101.
11. Holbrook M.B., Hirschman E.C. The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research. 9(2):1982;132-140.
12. Jeong M., Lambert C.U. Adaptation of an information quality framework to measure customers' behavioral intentions to use lodging web sites. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 20:2001;129-146.
13. Karahanna E., Straub D.W., Chervany M.L. Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly. 23(2):1999;183-213.
14. Kim, J., 2001a. Deficient Popularity of the Internet Appliances, Maeil Business, 5 September, 2001.
15. Kim, S., 2001b. Digital TV' Visible Range and Market Size, Korea Daily, 14 December, 2001.
16. Kim, Y., 2001c. Highlight on Digital TV (1): Prologue, The Digital Times, 25 October, 2001.
17. Kwon, H.S., Chidambaram, L., 2000. A test of the technology acceptance model: The case of cellular telephone adoption, Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 3-6.
18. Lau A., Yen J., Chau P.Y.K. Adoption of on-line trading of investors in the Hong Kong financial market. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research. 2(2):2001;2-19.
19. Lewis T. Information Appliances: Gadget Netopia. Computer. 1998;59-68.
20. Limayem M., Khalifa M., Frini A. What makes consumers buy from the Internet? A longitudinal study of online shopping. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans. 30(4):2000;421-432.
21. Malhotra, Y., Dennis, F.G., 1999. Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: Theoretical bases and empirical validation, Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 6-14.
22. Mohageg M.F., Wagner A. Design considerations for information appliances. Information Appliances and Beyond. 2:2000;27-51.
23. Morris, M.G., Dillon, A., 1997. How user perceptions influence software use, IEEE Transactions, July/August, pp. 58-65.
24. Norman D.A. The Invisible Computer. 1998;The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
25. O'Brien, J., 2001. Most Wanted by Users: VOD & Internet on TV, The Digitrends, 25 January, 2001. Available at http://www.digitrends.net/nwna/index_13862.html.
26. Randolph, C., 1999. Why do we Hate Microsoft and Still Use Word? Proceedings of the 10th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, pp. 736-748.
27. Segars A.H., Grover V. Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: A confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Quarterly. 1993;517-525.
28. Sheth J.N., Newman B.I., Gross B.L. Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research. 22:1991;159-170.
29. Sweeney J.C., Soutar G.N. Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing. 77:2001;203-220.
30. Taylor S., Todd P. Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: A study of consumer adoption intentions. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 12:1995;137-156.
31. Venkatesh A. Computers and other interactive technologies for the home. Communications of the ACM. 39(12):1996;47-54.
32. Venkatesh V.A. Longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: Adoption determinants and emerging challenges. MIS Quarterly. 25(1):2001;71-102.
33. Vos, D.L., 2000. Searching for the Holy Grail: Images of Interactive Television, Proceedings of European Media Masters of Arts. Rotterdam: EMMA, pp. 1-138.
34. Wirtz B.W. Convergence processes, value constellations and integration strategies in the multimedia business. The International Journal on Media Management. 1(1):1999;14-22.
35. Xia, W., Lee, G., 2000. The influence of persuasion, training and experience on user perceptions and acceptance of IT innovation, Proceedings of ICIS, 371-384.
36. Yang H., Choi I. The impact of social influence on information systems adoption: An extension to the technology acceptance model. KMIS. 11(3):2001;165-184.
37. Zanna M.P., Rempel J.K. Attitudes: A new look at an old concept. Bar-Tal D., Kruglanski A.W. The Social Psychology of Knowledge. 1988;315-334 Cambridge University Press, New York.