The ontogeny of scale-free syntax networks: Phase transitions in early language acquisition

Advances in Complex Systems

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 371-392

  Corominas Murtra, Bernat ^a   Valverde, Sergi ^a   SolÉ, Ricard ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^b SANTA FE INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Complex networks; Language acquisition; Language evolution; Small worlds; Syntax

Indexed keywords

EID: 68349150642     PISSN: 02195259     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0219525909002192     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Barabási, A.-L. and Albert, R., Emergence of scaling in random networks, Science 286 (1999) 509.
2. Bickerton, D., Language and Species (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1990).
3. Bloom, L., Hood, L. and Lightbown, P., Imitation in language development if when and why, Cogn. Psychol. (1974) 380-420.
4. Bloom, L., Lightbown, P. and Hood, L., Structure and variation in child language, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Ser. 160 (1975).
5. Bollobás, B., Random Graphs (Cambridge University Press, 2001).
6. Chomsky, N., Language and Problems of Knowledge (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1988).
7. Christiansen, M. H. and Chater, N., Language as shaped by the brain, Behav. Brain Sci. 31 (2008) 489-509.
8. Christiansen, M. H. and Kirby, S., Language evolution: Consensus and controversies, Trends Cogn. Sci. 7 (2003) 300-307.
9. Corominas-Murtra, B., Network statistics on early english syntax: Structural criteria, arXiv.org:0704.3708 (2007).
10. Deacon, T. W., The Symbolic Species: The Coevolution of Language and the Brain (Norton and Co., New York).
11. Dorogovtsev, S. N. and Mendes, J. F. F., Language as an evolving word web, Proc. Royal Soc. London B 268 (2001).
12. Dorogovtsev, S. N. and Mendes, J. F. F., Evolution of Networks (Oxford University Press, New York, 2003).
13. Elman, J. L., Learning and development in neural networks: The importance of starting small, Cognition 48 (1993) 71-99.
14. Erdös, P. and Rényi, A., On random graphs, Publ. Math. (Debrecen) 6 (1959) 290-297.
15. Ferrer-i-Cancho, R., When language breaks into pieces: A conflict between communication through isolated signals and language, Biosystems 84 (2006) 242-253.
16. Ferrer-i-Cancho, R., Köhler, R. and Solé, R. V., Patterns in syntactic dependency networks, Phys. Rev. E 69 (2004) 051915.
17. Ferrer-i-Cancho, R. and Solé, R. V., The small world of human language, Proc. Royal Soc. London B 268 (2001).
18. Gould, S. J. and Lewontin, R. C., The spandrels of san marco and the panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme, Proc. Roy. Soc. London B 205 (1979) 581-598.
19. Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. and Fitch, T. W., The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298 (2002) 1569-1579.
20. Holland, P. W. and Leinhardt, S., A method for detecting structure in sociometric data, Am. J. Soc. 70 (1970) 492-513.
21. Hudson, R., Language Networks: The New Word Grammar (Oxford University Press, New York, 2006).
22. Hurford, J., Biological evolution of the saussurean sign as a component of the language acquisition device, Lingua 77 (1989) 187-222.
23. Kauffman, S. A., The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution (Oxford University Press, 1993).
24. Ke, J., Complex networks and human language, arXiv:cs/0701135 (2007).
25. Kiikeri, M. and Kokkonen, T., Biological notions of innateness and explanation of language acquisition, in Rethinking explanation, eds. Persson, J. and Ylikoski, P. (Springer, New York, 2007), pp. 177-192.
26. Komarova, N., Niyogi, P. and Nowak, M., The evolutionary dynamics of grammar acquisition, J. Theor. Biol. 209 (2001) 43-59.
27. Komarova, N. L. and Niyogi, P., Optimizing the mutual intelligibility of linguistic agents in a shared world, Art. Int. 154 (2004) 1-42.
28. Macwhinney, B., The emergence of linguistic form in time, Connect. Sci. 17 (2005) 191-211.
29. Maynard-Smith, J. and Szathmáry, E., The Major Transitions in Evolution (University of New York Press, New York, 1997).
30. Meļcuck, I., Dependency Grammar: Theory and Practice (Oxford University Press, New York, 1989).
31. Miller, G. A. and Chomsky, N., Finitary models of language users, in Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, eds. Luce, R. D., Bush, R. and Galanter, E., Vol. 2 (Wiley, New York, 1963), pp. 419-491.
32. Newman, M. E. J., Assortative mixing in networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 208701.
33. Newport, E. L., Maturational constraints on language learning, Cogn. Sci. 14 (1990) 11-28.
34. Niyogi, P., The Computational Nature of Language Learning and Evolution (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2006).
35. Nowak, M. A. and Krakauer, D., The evolution of language, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 96 (1999) 8028-8033.
36. Oudeyer, P.-Y., Self-Organization in the Evolution of Speech, Studies in the Evolution of Language (Oxford University Press, 2006).
37. Pinker, S., The Language Instinct (Penguin Books, London, 1994).
38. Pinker, S. and Bloom, P., Natural language and natural selection, Behav. Brain Sci. (1990) 707-786.
39. Radford, A., Syntactic Theory and the Acquisition of English Syntax: The Nature of Early Child Grammars of English (Oxford, Blackwell, 1990).
40. Sigman, M. and Cecchi, G., Global organization of the wordnet lexicon, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 99 (2002) 1742-1747.
41. Solé, R. and Goodwin, B., Signs of Life: How Complexity Pervades Biology (New York, NY, Basic Books, 2001).
42. Steels, L., The synthetic modelling of language origins, Evol. Commun. 1(1) (1997) 1-34.
43. Steels, L., Evolving grounded communication for robots, Trends Cogn. Sci. 7 (2003) 308-312.
44. Steyvers, M. and Tenenbaum, J. B., The large-scale structure of semantic networks: Statistical analyses and a model of semantic growth, Cogn. Sci. 29 (2005) 41-78.
45. Szamadó, S. and Szathmáry, E., Selective scenarios for the emergence of natural language, Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21 (2006) 555-561.
46. Szathmáry, E., Szatmáry, Z., Ittzés, P., Orbán, G., Zachár, I., Huszár, F., Fedor, A., Varga, M. and Számadó, S., In silico evolutionary developmental neurobiology and the origin of natural language, in Emergence of Communication and Language, eds. Lyon, C., and Nehaniv, C. L. and Cangelosi, A. (Springer-Verlag, London, 2007), pp. 151-187.
47. Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V. M., Pine, J. M. and Rowland, C. F., The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb-argument structure: An alternative account, J. Child Lang. 28 (2001) 127-152.
48. Veneziano, E. and Sinclair, H., The changing status of "filler syllables" on the way to grammatical morphemes, J. Child Lang. 27 (2000) 461-500.
49. Wasserman, S. and Faust, K., Social Network Analysis (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1994).
50. Watts, D. J. and Strogatz, S. H., Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks, Nature 393 (1998) 440-442.
51. Zipf, G. K., Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1949).