|
Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 25-37
|
Test data volume comparison: Monolithic vs. modular SoC testing
b
NVIDIA
(United States)
c
IMEC
(United States)
|
Author keywords
Automatic test pattern generation; Computer architecture; Flip flops; IEEE Std 1500; Logic cores; Magnetic cores; Modular testing; Monolithic testing; Pediatrics; SoC testing; System on a chip; Test application time; Test data volume
|
Indexed keywords
FLIP-FLOPS;
IEEE STD 1500;
LOGIC CORES;
MODULAR TESTING;
MONOLITHIC TESTING;
SOC TESTING;
SYSTEM-ON-A-CHIP;
TEST APPLICATION TIME;
TEST DATA VOLUME;
APPLICATION SPECIFIC INTEGRATED CIRCUITS;
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN;
COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE;
COMPUTER TESTING;
COMPUTERS;
DATA COMPRESSION;
FLIP FLOP CIRCUITS;
MAGNETIC CIRCUITS;
MAGNETIC CORES;
MAGNETIC DEVICES;
MICROPROCESSOR CHIPS;
PEDIATRICS;
PROGRAMMABLE LOGIC CONTROLLERS;
TEST FACILITIES;
TESTING;
AUTOMATIC TEST PATTERN GENERATION;
|
EID: 68349146233
PISSN: 07407475
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1109/MDT.2009.65 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (17)
|
References (7)
|