Predicting vigilance: A fresh look at an old problem

Ergonomics

Volumn 52, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 791-808

  Finomore, V ^a   Matthews, G ^b   Shaw, T ^b   Warm, J ^a  

^a AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

Individual differences; Personality; Personnel selection; Vigilance

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE TASK ANALYSIS; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY TRAITS; PREDICTOR VARIABLES; SECURITY SETTINGS; STRESS RESPONSE; STRESS STATE; THEORETICAL APPROACH; VIGILANCE; WORK ENVIRONMENTS;

EMPLOYMENT; ENTERPRISE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; HUMAN ENGINEERING; JOB ANALYSIS; PERSONNEL; SURVEYS;

PERSONNEL SELECTION;

ALERTNESS; ANXIETY; ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER; ATTENTION DISTURBANCE; BOREDOM; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONSCIENCE; COPING BEHAVIOR; EMOTIONALITY; EXTRAVERSION; FATIGUE; HUMAN; INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT; INTROVERSION; JOB PERFORMANCE; JOB STRESS; MENTAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEUROSIS; OCCUPATIONAL HAZARD; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY; PERSONALITY DISORDER; PREDICTION; REVIEW; SCHIZOTYPAL PERSONALITY DISORDER; SOMNOLENCE; WANDERING BEHAVIOR; WORK ENVIRONMENT;

APTITUDE; ATTENTION; HUMANS; MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY TESTS; PERSONNEL SELECTION;

EID: 68349130220     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: 13665847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00140130802641627     Document Type: Review

References (152)

1. Ackerman, P.L., Beier, M.E., and Boyle, M.O., 2005. Working memory and intelligence: The same or different constructs? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 30-60.
2. Ackerman, P. and Cianciolo, A., 2000. Cognitive, perceptual-speed, and psychomotor determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 259-290.
3. Amir, T., et al., 2001. Effects of caffeine on vigilance performance in introvert and extravert noncoffee drinkers. Social Behavior and Personality, 29, 617-624.
4. Antrobus, J.S., Coleman, R., and Singer, J.L., 1967. Signal-detection performance by subjects differing in predisposition to daydreaming. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31, 487-491.
5. Ashton, M.C., Lee, K., and Paunonen, S.V., 2002. What is the central feature of extraversion? Social attention versus reward sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 245-251.
6. Bakan, P., 1963. An analysis of retrospective reports following an auditory vigilance task. In: D.D. Buckner and J.J. McGrath, eds. Vigilance: A symposium. New York: McGraw Hill, 100-108.
7. Baker, R.A., Ware, J.R., and Sipowicz, R.R., 1962. Vigilance: A comparison in auditory, visual, and combined audio-visual tasks. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 16, 192-198.
8. Barmack, J.E., 1937. Boredom and other factors in the physiology of mental effort: An exploratory study. Archives of Psychology, 218, 5-83.
9. Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K., and Judge, T.A., 2001. Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9-30.
10. Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K., and Strauss, J.P., 1993. Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 715-722.
11. Beauducel, A., Brocke, B., and Leue, A., 2006. Energetical bases of extroversion: Effort, arousal, EEG, and performance. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62, 212-223.
12. Berch, D.B. and Kanter, D.R., 1984. Individual differences. In: J.S. Warm, ed. Sustained attention in human performance. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 143-178.
13. Boles, D.B., et al., 2007. Predicting dual-task performance with the multiple resources questionnaire (MRQ). Human Factors, 49, 32-45.
14. Broadbent, D.E., et al., 1982. The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21, 1-16.
15. Caggiano, D.M. and Parasuraman, R., 2004. The role of memory representation in the vigilance decrement. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 932-937.
16. Carroll, J.B., 1993. Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Casagrande, M., 2002. Individual differences in vigilance and performance during continuous/sustained operations. Report produced for the RTO HFM lecture series on 'Sleep/Wakefulness Management in Continuous/Sustained Operations', 17-18 June 2002, Fort Rucker, Alabama. RTO-EN-016 1-1-1-14.
18. Cheyne, J.A., Carriere, J.S.A., and Smilek, D., 2006. Absent-mindedness: Lapses of conscious awareness and everyday cognitive failures. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 578-592.
19. Corr, P.J., 2004. Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 317-332.
20. Costa, P.T. Jr and McCrae, R.R., 1992. NEO PI-R Professional Manual Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
21. Cowan, N., 2005. Understanding intelligence: A summary and an adjustable-attention hypothesis. In: O. Wilhelm and R. Engle, eds. Handbook of understanding and measuring intelligence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 469-488.
22. Cox-Fuenzalida, L., Swickert, R., and Hittner, J.B., 2004. Effects of neuroticism and workload history on performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 447-456.
23. Cox-Fuenzalida, L., et al., 2006. Extraversion and task performance: A fresh look through the workload history lens. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 432-439.
24. Craig, A., 1984. Human engineering: The control of vigilance. In: J.S. Warm, ed. Sustained attention in human performance. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 247-291.
25. Davies, D.R. and Parasuraman, R., 1982. The psychology of vigilance London: Academic Press.
26. Dibartolo, P.M., Brown, T.A., and Barlow, D.H., 1997. Effects of anxiety on attentional allocation and task performance: An information processing analysis. Behaviours Research and Therapy, 35, 1101-1111.
27. Dixon, S.R., Wickens, C.D., and McCarley, J.S., 2007. On the independence of compliance and reliance: Are automation false alarms worse than misses? Human Factors, 49, 564-573.
28. Dolcos, F. and McCarthy, G., 2006. Brain systems mediating cognitive interference by emotional distraction. Journal of Neuroscience, 26 (7), 2072-2079.
29. Eysenck, H.J., 1967. The biological basis of personality. New York: Springfield.
30. Eysenck, H.J. and Eysenck, M.W., 1985. Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. New York: Plenum.
31. Eysenck, M.W., 1992. Anxiety: The cognitive perspective. Hove, England: Erlbaum.
32. Eysenck, M.W., et al., 2007. Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7, 336-353.
33. Eysenck, S.B.G., Eysenck, H.J., and Barrett, P.T., 1985. A revised version of the Psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 21-29.
34. Fairclough, S.H. and Venables, L., 2006. Prediction of subjective states from psychophysiology: A multivariate approach. Biological Psychology 71, 100-110.
35. Farmer, R. and Sundberg, N.D., 1986. Boredom proneness - The development and correlates of a new scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 4-17.
36. Finomore, V.S., et al., 2006. Measuring the workload of sustained attention. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50, 1614-1618.
37. Frey, D.J., Badia, P., and Wright, K.P., 2004. Inter- and intra-individual variability in performance near the circadian nadir during sleep deprivation. Journal of Sleep Research, 13, 305-315.
38. Fronczek, R., et al., 2006. Focusing on vigilance instead of sleepiness in the assessment of narcolepsy: High sensitivity of the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART). Sleep, 29, 187-191.
39. Geen, R.G., 1985. Test anxiety and visual vigilance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 963-970.
40. Geen, R.G., McCown, E.J., and Broyles, J.W., 1985. Effects of noise on sensitivity of introverts and extraverts to signals in a vigilance task. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 237-241.
41. Geiwitz, P.J., 1966. Structure of boredom. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 3, 592-600.
42. Giambra, L.M., 1987. Task-unrelated thought frequency during vigilance. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 25, 332.
43. Gordon, M., 1996. Administrative manual for the Gordon Diagnostic System. New York: DeWitt.
44. Grubb, P.L., et al., 1994. Cognitive failure and perceived workload in vigilance performance. In: M. Mouloua and R. Parasuraman, eds. Human performance in automated systems: Current research and trends. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 115-121.
45. Hancock, P.A. and Warm, J.S., 2008. A dynamic model of stress and sustained attention. In: N.J. Cooke and E. Salas, eds. Best of human factors: Thirty classic contributions to human factors/ergonomics science and engineering. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 418-436.
46. Hart, S.G. and Staveland, L.E., 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In: P.A. Hancock and N. Meshkati, eds. Human mental workload. Oxford, UK: North-Holland, 139-183.
47. Helton, W.S., 2003. Effects of signal salience and noise on performance and stress in an abbreviated vigil. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 63 (7-B), 3501.
48. Helton, W.S., et al., 2003. Challenges to the mindlessness model of vigilance through signal regularity. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 47, 1673-1677.
49. Helton, W.S., et al., 2005. Signal regularity and the mindlessness model of vigilance. British Journal of Psychology, 96, 249-261.
50. Hitchcock, E.M. and Matthews, G., 2005. Multidimensional assessment of fatigue: A review and recommendations. In: Proceedings of the international conference on fatigue management in transportation operations, September, Seattle.
51. Hitchcock, E.M., et al., 1999. Effects of cueing and knowledge of results on workload and boredom in sustained attention. Human Factors 41, 365-372.
52. Hockey, G.R.J., 1997. Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: A cognitive-energetical framework. Biological Psychology, 45, 73-93.
53. Hoddes, E., et al., 1973. Quantification of sleepiness: A new approach. Psychophysiology, 10, 431-436.
54. Humphreys, M.S. and Revelle, W., 1984. Personality, motivation, and performance: A theory of the relationship between individual differences and information processing. Psychological Review, 91, 153-184.
55. Johns, M.W., 1994. Sleepiness in different situations measured by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Sleep, 17, 703-710.
56. Johnson, A. and Proctor, R.W., 2004. Attention: Theory and practice Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57. Kass, S.J., et al., 2001. Watching the clock: Boredom and vigilance performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 92, 969-976.
58. Koelega, H.S., 1992. Extraversion and vigilance performance: 30 years of inconsistencies. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 239-258.
59. Lazarus, R.S. and Folkman, S., 1984. Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.
60. Lee, J.D., 2008. Review of a pivotal Human Factors article: 'Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse'. Human Factors 50, 404-410.
61. Lees, M.N. and Lee, J.D., 2007. The influence of distraction and driving context on driver response to imperfect collision warning systems. Ergonomics, 50, 1264-1286.
62. Lehman, E.B., et al., 2006. Auditory and visual continuous performance tasks: Relationships with age, gender, cognitive functioning, and classroom behavior. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24, 36-51.
63. Lenzenweger, M.F., 2001. Reaction time slowing during high-load, sustained-attention task performance in relation to psychometrically identified schizotypy. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 290-296.
64. Lenzenweger, M.F., Cornblatt, B.A., and Putnick, M., 1991. Schizotypy and sustained attention. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 84-89.
65. Lester, J., Knapp, T., and Roessler, R., 1976. Sleep deprivation, personality and performance on a complex vigilance task. Waking and Sleep, 3, 238-248.
66. McGrath, J.J., 1963. Irrelevant stimulation and vigilance performance. In: D.N. Buckner and J.J. McGrath, eds. Vigilance: A symposium New York: McGraw Hill, 19-27.
67. McLellan, T.M., et al., 2005. Caffeine maintains vigilance and marksmanship in simulated urban operations with sleep deprivation. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 76, 39-45.
68. Manly, T., et al., 1999. The absent mind: Further investigation of sustained attention to response. Neuropsychologia, 37, 661-670.
69. Manly, T., et al., 2002. Coffee in the cornflakes: Time-of-day as a modulator of executive response control. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1-6.
70. Manly, T., et al., 2003. Enhancing the sensitivity of a sustained attention task to frontal damage: Convergent clinical and functional imaging evidence. Neurocase, 9, 340-349.
71. Mason, O., 1995. A confirmatory factor analysis of the structure of schizotypy. European Journal of Personality, 9, 271-282.
72. Mason, O. and Claridge, G., 2006. The Oxford-Liverpool Inventory of Feelings and Experiences (O-LIFE): Further description and extended norms. Schizophrenia Research, 82, 203-211.
73. Matthews, G., 1992. Extraversion. In: A.P. Smith and D.M. Jones, eds. Handbook of human performance. Vol. 3: State and trait. London: Academic, 95-126.
74. Matthews, G. and Campbell, S.E., 1998. Task-induced stress and individual differences in coping. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 42, 821-825.
75. Matthews, G. and Davies, D.R., 1998. Arousal and vigilance: The role of task factors. In: R.B. Hoffman,M.F. Sherrick, and J.S. Warm, eds. Viewing psychology as a whole: The integrative science of William N. Dember.Washington,DC: American Psychological Association, 113-144.
76. Matthews, G., Davies, D.R., and Holley, P.J., 1990a. Extraversion, arousal and visual sustained attention: The role of resource availability. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 1159-1173.
77. Matthews, G., Davies, D.R., and Holley, P.J., 1993. Cognitive predictors of vigilance. Human Factors, 35, 3-24.
78. Matthews, G., Davies, D.R., and Lees, J.L., 1990b. Arousal, extraversion, and individual differences in resource availability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 150-168.
79. Matthews, G., Deary, I.J., and Whiteman, M.C., 2003. Personality traits. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
80. Matthews, G. and Desmond, P.A., 2002. Task-induced fatigue states and simulated driving performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 659-686.
81. Matthews, G. and Falconer, S., 2000. Individual differences in task-induced stress in customer service personnel. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 44, 145-148.
82. Matthews, G. and Gilliland, K., 1999. The personality theories of H.J. Eysenck and J.A. Gray: A comparative review. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 583-626.
83. Matthews, G., Jones, D.M., and Chamberlain, A.G., 1989. Interactive effects of extraversion and arousal on attentional task performance: Multiple resources or encoding processes? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 629-639.
84. Matthews, G. and Margetts, I., 1991. Self-report arousal and divided attention: A study of performance operating characteristics. Human Performance, 4, 107-125.
85. Matthews, G., Warm, J.S., and Washburn, D., 2005. Diagnostic methods for predicting performance impairment associated with combat stress. Report for U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, contract # W81XWH-04-C-0002.
86. Matthews, G., Warm, J.S., and Washburn, D., 2006. Diagnostic methods for predicting performance impairment associated with combat stress. Report for U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, contract # W23RYX-3106-N605.
87. Matthews, G., et al., 1999. Validation of a comprehensive stress state questionnaire: Towards a state 'Big Three'?. In: I. Mervielde, I.J. Deary, F. De Fruyt, and F. Ostendorf, eds. Personality psychology in Europe, vol. 7. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press, 335-350.
88. Matthews, G., et al., 2000. Human performance: Cognition, stress and individual differences. London: Psychology Press.
89. Matthews, G., et al., 2001. The common cold impairs visual attention, psychomotor performance and task engagement. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 45, 1377-1381.
90. Matthews, G., et al., 2002. Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: Task engagement, distress and worry. Emotion, 2, 315-340.
91. Matthews, G., et al., 2006. Emotional intelligence, personality, and task-induced stress. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 12, 96-107.
92. Megaw, E.D., 1979. Factors affecting visual inspection accuracy. Applied Ergonomics, 10, 27-32.
93. Merritt, S.M. and Ilgen, D.R., 2008. Not all trust is created equal: Dispositional and history-based trust in human-automation interaction. Human Factors, 50, 194-210.
94. Molloy, R. and Parasuraman, R., 1996. Monitoring an automated system for a single failure: Vigilance and task complexity effects. Human Factors, 38, 311-322.
95. Nigg, J.T., et al., 2002. Big Five dimensions and ADHD symptoms: Links between personality traits and clinical symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 451-469.
96. O'Donnell, R.D. and Eggemeier, F.T., 1986. Workload assessment methodology. In: K.R. Boff, L. Kaufman, and J.P. Thomas, eds. Handbook of perception and human performance, vol. 2: Cognitive processes and performance. New York: Wiley, 42-1-42-49.
97. Parasuraman, R., 1984. Sustained attention in detection and discrimination. In: R. Parasuraman and D.R. Davis, eds. Varieties of attention. New York: Academic Press, 243-271.
98. Parasuraman, R. and Riley, V., 1997. Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39, 230-253.
99. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T.B., and Wickens, C.D., 2008. Situation awareness, mental workload, and trust in automation: Viable, empirically supported cognitive engineering constructs. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 2, 141-161.
100. Parasuraman, R., Warm, J.S., and Dember, W.N., 1987. Vigilance: Taxonomy and utility. In: L.S. Mark, J.S. Warm, and R.L. Huston, eds. Ergonomics and human factors: Recent research. New York: Springer, 11-32.
101. Parasuraman, R., Warm, J.S., and See, J.E., 1998. Brain systems of vigilance. In: R. Parasuraman, ed. The attentive brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 221-256.
102. Pashler, H.E., 1998. The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
103. Posner, M.I. and Pertersen, S.E., 1990. The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25-42.
104. Prinzel, L.J., et al., 2001. Examination of automation-induced complacency and individual difference variates. Tech. memorandum No. 211413. Hampton, VA: NASA Langley Research Center.
105. Proctor, R.W. and Van Zandt, T., 1994. Human factors in simple and complex systems. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
106. Raine, A., 1991. The SPQ: A scale for the assessment of schizotypal personality based on DSM-III-R criteria. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 17, 555-564.
107. Rawlings, D., Claridge, G., and Freeman, J.L., 2001. Principal components analysis of the Schizotypal Personality Scale (STA) and the Borderline Personality Scale (STB). Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 409-419.
108. Rawlings, D. and Goldberg, M., 2001. Correlating a measure of sustained attention with a multidimensional measure of schizotypal traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 421-431.
109. Reason, J.T., 1984. Lapses of attention in everyday life. In: R. Parasuraman and D.R. Davies, eds. Varieties of attention. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
110. Reason, J.T., 1990. Human error. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
111. Robertson, I.H., et al., 1997. Oops! Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 35, 747-758.
112. Rose, C.L., et al., 2002. The role of the Big Five personality factors in vigilance performance and workload. European Journal of Personality, 16, 185-200.
113. Sawin, D.A. and Scerbo, M.W., 1995. Effects of instruction type and boredom proneness in vigilance: Implications for boredom and workload. Human Factors, 37, 752-765.
114. Scerbo, M.W., 1998. What's so boring about vigilance?. In: R.R. Hoffman, M.F. Sherrick, and J.S. Warm, eds. Viewing psychology as a whole: The integrative science of William N. Dember. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 145-166.
115. Schmidt, A., et al., 2004. Vigilance performance and extraversion reconsidered: Some performance differences can indeed be induced. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1343-1351.
116. Schweizer, K. and Moosbrugger, H., 2004. Attention and working memory as predictors of intelligence. Intelligence, 32, 329-347.
117. Schweizer, K.,Moosbrugger, H., and Goldhammer, F., 2005. The structure of the relationship between attention and intelligence. Intelligence 33, 589-611.
118. See, J.E., et al., 1995. Meta-analysis of the sensitivity decrement in vigilance. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 230-249.
119. Sheridan, T., 1980. Supervisory control. In: G. Salvendy, ed. Handbook of human factors. New York: Wiley, 1243-1268.
120. Singh, I.L., Molloy, R., and Parasuraman, R., 1993. Automation-induced 'complacency': Development of a complacency-potential scale. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 111-122.
121. Singh, I.L.,Molloy, R., and Parasuraman, R., 2001. Individual differences in monitoring failures of automation. The Journal of General Psychology, 120, 357-373.
122. Smallwood, J. and Schooler, J.W., 2006. The restless mind. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 946-958.
123. Smallwood, J., et al., 2004. Subjective experience and the attentional lapse: Task engagement and disengagement during sustained attention. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 657-690.
124. Smit, A.S., Eling, P.A.T.M., and Coenen, A.M.L., 2004a. Mental effort affects vigilance enduringly: After-effects in EEG and behavior. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 53, 239-243.
125. Smit, A.S., Eling, P.A.T.M., and Coenen, A.M.L., 2004b. Mental effort causes vigilance decrease due to resource depletion. Acta Psychologica, 115, 35-42.
126. Smit, A.S., et al., 2005. Mental and physical effort affect vigilance differently. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 57, 211-217.
127. Smith, A.P. and Maben, A., 1993. Effects of sleep deprivation, lunch, and personality on performance, mood, and cardiovascular function. Physiology and Behavior, 54, 967-972.
128. Szalma, J.L., et al., 2004. Effects of sensory modality and task duration on performance, workload, and stress in sustained attention. Human Factors, 46, 219-233.
129. Temple, J.G., et al., 2000. The effects of caffeine and signal salience on performance, workload, and stress in an abbreviated vigilance task. Human Factors, 42, 183-194.
130. Thackray, R.I., Bailey, J.P., and Touchstone, R.M., 1977. Physiological, subjective, and performance correlates of reported boredom and monotony while performing a simulated radar control task. In: R.R. Mackie, ed. Vigilance, theory, operational performance, and physiological correlates. New York: Plenum, 203-215.
131. Thayer, R.E., 1989. The biopsychology of mood and arousal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
132. Thiffault, P. and Bergeron, J., 2003. Fatigue and individual differences in monotonous simulated driving. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 159-176.
133. Thompson, L.L., Whitmore, E.A., Raymond, K.M., and Crowley, T.J., 2006. Measuring impulsivity in adolescents with serious sunstance and conduct problems. Assessment, 13, 3-15.
134. Tripp, L.D. and Warm, J.S., 2007. Transcranial Doppler sonography. In R. Parasuraman and M. Rizzo, eds. Neuroergonomics: The brain at work. New York: Oxford, 82-94.
135. Van Der Linden, D., et al., 2005. Work stress and attentional difficulties: An initial study on burnout and cognitive failures. Work and Stress, 19, 23-36.
136. Van Dongen, H.P.A., et al., 2004. Systematic interindividual differences in neurobehavioral impairment from sleep loss: Evidence of trait-like differential vulnerability. Sleep: Journal of Sleep and Sleep Disorders Research, 27, 423-433.
137. Verwey, W.B. and Zaidel, D.M., 2000. Predicting drowsiness accidents from personal attributes, eye blinks and ongoing driving behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 123-142.
138. Wallace, J.C., Kass, S.J., and Stanny, C., 2001. Predicting performance in 'go' situations: A new use for the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire? North American Journal of Psychology, 3, 481-490.
139. Ware, J.R., Baker, R.A., and Sipowicz, R.R., 1962. Performance of mental deficients on a simple vigilance task. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 66, 647-650.
140. Warm, J.S. and Dember, W.N., 1998. Tests of a vigilance taxonomy. In R.R. Hoffman, M.E. Sherrick, and J.S. Warm, eds. Viewing psychology as a whole: The integrative science of William N. Dember. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 87-112.
141. Warm, J.S., Dember, W.N., and Hancock, P.A., 1996. Vigilance and workload in automated systems. In: R. Parasuraman and M. Mouloua, eds. Automation and human performance: Theory and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 183-200.
142. Warm, J.S., Matthews, G., and Finomore, V.S., 2008a. Vigilance, workload, and stress. In: P.A. Hancock and J.L. Szalma, eds. Performance under stress. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 115-141.
143. Warm, J.S., Matthews, G., and Parasuraman, R., 2009. Cerebral hemodynamics and vigilance performance. Military Psychology, 21, 75-100.
144. Warm, J.S. and Parasuraman, R., 2007. Cerebral hemodynamics and vigilance. In: R. Parasuraman and M. Rizzo, eds. Neuroergonomics: The brain at work. New York: Oxford, 146-158.
145. Warm, J.S., Parasuraman, R., and Matthews, G., 2008b. Vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful. Human Factors, 50, 433-441.
146. Widiger, T.A. and Costa, P.T., 2002. Five-factor model personality disorder research. In: P.T. Costa and T.A. Widiger, eds. Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 59-87.
147. Wiener, E.L., 1975. Individual and group differences in inspection. In: C.G. Drury and J.G. Fox, eds. Human reliability in quality control. London: Taylor and Francis.
148. Willcutt, E.G., et al., 2005. Validity of the executive function theory of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A meta-analytic review. Biological Psychiatry, 57, 1336-1346.
149. Young, S., 2004. The YAQ-S and YAQ-I: The development of self and informant questionnaires reporting on current adult ADHD symptomatology, comorbid and associated problems. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1211-1223.
150. Young, S. and Gudjonsson, G.H., 2005. Neuropsychological correlates of the YAQ-S and YAQ-I self- and informant-reported ADHD symptomatology, emotional and social problems and delinquent behaviour. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 47-57.
151. Young, M.S. and Stanton, N.A., 2002. Malleable attentional resources theory: A new explanation for the effects of mental underload on performance. Human Factors, 44, 365-375.
152. Zuckerman, M., 2005. Psychobiology of personality. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.