Contemporary pollen flow, characterization of the maternal ecological neighbourhood and mating patterns in wild cherry (Prunus avium L.)

Heredity

Volumn 103, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 118-128

  Cottrell, J E ^a   Vaughan, S P ^b,c   Connolly, T ^a   Sing, L ^a   Moodley, D J ^b   Russell, K ^b  

^a FOREST RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^b EAST MALLING RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^c ROTHAMSTED RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Gene flow; Pollen; Prunus; S locus; Self incompatibility; SSR

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL LAND; CLONAL ORGANISM; ECOLOGICAL IMPACT; FRAGMENTATION; FRUIT; GAMETOPHYTE; GENETIC RESOURCE; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; LANDSCAPE CHANGE; LOWLAND ENVIRONMENT; MATERNAL CARE; MATING BEHAVIOR; NEOLITHIC; PATERNAL EFFECT; POLLEN; POLLINATION; RAMET; TREE PLANTING; VEGETATIVE REPRODUCTION; WILD POPULATION; WOODLAND;

EURASIA; EUROPE; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

PRUNUS; PRUNUS AVIUM;

ARTICLE; ECOLOGY; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETICS; POLLEN; POLLINATION; PRUNUS; REPRODUCTION;

ECOLOGY; GENE FREQUENCY; POLLEN; POLLINATION; PRUNUS; REPRODUCTION;

EID: 68349128985     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2009.39     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Adams WT (1992). Gene dispersal within forest tree populations. New Forests 6: 217-240.
2. Bacles CFE, Lowe AJ, Ennos RA (2004). Genetic effects of chronic habitat fragmentation on tree species: the case of Sorbus aucuparia in a deforested Scottish landscape. Mol Ecol 13: 573-584.
3. Biscaia de Lacerda AE, Kanashiro M, Sebbenn AM (2008). Long pollen movement and deviation from random mating in a low density contiuous population of a tropical tree Hymenaea courbaril in the Brazilian Amazon. Biotropica 40: 462-470.
4. Broyles SB, Wyatt R (1995). A re-examination of the pollendonation hypothesis in an experimental population of Asclepias exaltata. Evolution 49: 89-99.
5. Batschelet E (1981). Circular Statistics in Biology. Academic Press: London.
6. Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW (1980). Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 32: 314-331.
7. Campbell JM, Lawrence MJ (1981). The population genetics of the self-incompatibility polymorphism in Papaver rhoeas I. The number and distribution of S-alleles in families from three localities. Heredity 46: 69-79.
8. De Nettancourt D (2001). Incompatibility and Incongruity in Wild and Cultivated Plants. Springer: Berlin.
9. Elle E, Meagher TR (2000). Sex allocation and reproductive success in the andromonoecious perennial Solanum carolinense (Solanaceae). II. Paternity and functional gender. Am Nat 156: 622-636.
10. Devlin B, Clegg J, Ellstrand NC (1992). The effect of flower production on male reproductive success in wild radish populations. Evolution 46: 1030-1042.
11. Franklin-Tong N, Franklin FCH (2003). Gametophytic self-incompatibility inhibits pollen tube growth using different mechanisms. Trends Plant Sci 8: 598-605.
12. Garcia C, Arroya JM, Godoy JA, Jordano P (2005). Mating patterns, pollen dispersal, and ecological maternal neighbourhood in a Prunus mahaleb L. population. Mol Ecol 14: 1821-1830.
13. Garcia C, Jordano P, Godoy JA (2007). Contemporary pollen and seed dispersal in a Prunus mahaleb population: patterns in distance and direction. Mol Ecol 16: 1947-1955.
14. Geng Q, Lian C, Goto S, Tao J, Kimura M, Islam MS, Hogetsu T (2008). Mating system, pollen and propagule dispersal, and spatial genetic structure in a high-density population of the mangrove tree Kandelia candel. Mol Ecol 17: 4583-4777.
15. Gerber S, Chabrier P, Kremer A (2003). FAMOZ: a software for parentage analysis using dominant, codominant and uni-parentally inherited markers. Mol Ecol Notes 3: 479-481.
16. Gumbert A, Kunze J (1999). Inflorescence height affect visitation behaviour of bees-a case study in an aquatic plant community in Bolivia. Biotropica 31: 466-477.
17. Handel SN (1983). Pollination ecology, plant population structure and gene flow. In: Real, L (ed). Pollination Biology. Academic Press: New York. pp 163-211.
18. Handel SN (1985). The intrusion of clonal growth patterns on plant breeding systems. Am Nat 125: 367-384.
19. Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (2002). SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol Ecol Notes 2: 618-620.
20. Hardy OJ, Gonzales-Martinez SC, Colas B, Freville H, Migno A, Olivieri I (2004). Fine-scale genetic structure and gene dispersal in Centaurea corymbosa (Asteraceae). II. Correlated paternity within and among sibships. Genetics 168: 1601-1614.
21. Hoebee SE, Arnold U, Düggelin C, Gugerli F, Brodbeck S, Rotach P, Holderegger R (2007). Mating patterns and contemporary gene flow by pollen in a large continuous and a small isolated population of the scattered forest tree Sorbus torminalis. Heredity 99: 47-55.
22. Knight ME, Martin AP, Bishop S, Osbourne JL, Hale RJ, Sanderson RA, Goulson D (2005). An interspecific comparison of foraging range and nest density of four bumblebee (Bombus) species. Mol Ecol 14: 1811-1820.
23. Kirby K, Goldberg E (2003). Ancient woodland:guidance material for local authorities. AWG1, English Nature: Peterborough. pp 1-21.
24. Kramer AT, Ison JL, Ashley MV, Howe HF (2008). The paradox of forest fragmentation genetics. Cons Biol 22: 878-885.
25. Kreyer D, Oed A, Walther-Hellwig K, Freankl R (2004). Are forests potential landscape barriers for foraging bumblebees? Landscape scale experiments with Bombus terrestris agg. and Bombus pascuorum (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Biol Con 116: 111-118.
26. Loiselle BA, Sork VL, Nason J, Graham C (1995). Spatial genetic structure of a tropical understory shrub Psychotria officinalis (Rubiaceae). Am J Bot 82: 1420-1425.
27. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM (1998). Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity interference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7: 639-655.
28. McCubbin AG, Kao TH (2000). Molecular recognition and response in pistil interactions. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 16: 333-364.
29. Meagher TR (1991). Analysis of paternity within a natural pop-ulation of Chamaelirium luteum. II. Patterns of male reproductive success. Am Nat 137: 738-752.
30. Nei M (1987). Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press: New York.
31. Oddou-Muratorio S, Klein EK, Demesure-Musch B, Austerlitz F (2006). Real-time patterns of pollen flow in the wild-service tree, Sorbus torminalis (Rosaceae). III. Mating patterns and the ecological maternal neighbourhood. Am J Bot 93: 1650-1659.
32. Pasquet RS, Peltier A, Hufford MB, Oudin E, Saulnier LP, Knudsen JT, Herren HR, Gepts P (2008). Long-distance pollen flow assessment through evaluation of pollinator foraging range suggests transgene escape distances. PNAS 105: 13456-13461.
33. Ritland K (2002). Extensions of models for the estimation of mating systems using n independent loci. Heredity 88: 221-228.
34. Routley MB, Kron P, Husband BC (2004). The consequences of clone size for paternal and maternal success in domestic apple (Malus domestica). Am J Bot 91: 1326-1332.
35. Schoen DJ, Stewart SC (1986). Variation in male reproductive investment and male reproductive success in white spruce. Evolution 40: 1109-1120.
36. Schueler S, Tusch A, Scholz F (2006). Comparative analysis of the within-population genetic structure in wild cherry (Prunus avium L.) at the self-incompatibility locus and nuclear microsatellites. Mol Ecol 15: 3231-3243.
37. Smouse PM, Meagher TR (1994). Genetic analysis of male reproductive contribution in Chamaelirium luteum (L.) Gray (Liliaceae). Genetics 136: 313-322.
38. Steven J, Rooney TP, Boyle OD, Waller DM (2003). Density dependent pollinator visitation and self incompatibility in upper Great Lakes populations of Trillium grandiflorum. J Torrey Bot Soc 130: 23-29.
39. Stoeckel S, Grange J, Fernandes-Manjarres FJ, Bilger I, Frascaria-Lacoste N, Mariette S (2006). Heterozygote excess in a self-incompatible and partially clonal forest tree species Prunus avium L. Mol Ecol 15: 2109-2118.
40. Streiff R, Ducousso A, Lexer C, Steinkellner H, Gloessl J, Kremer A (1999). Pollen dispersal inferred from paternity analysis in a mixed oak stand of Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Leibl. Mol Ecol 8: 831-841.
41. Summers K, Amos W (1997). Behavioural, ecological and molecular genetic analyses of reproductive strategies in the Amazonian dart-poison from, Dentrobates ventrimaculatus. Behav Ecol 8: 260-267.
42. Tarasjev A (2005). Impact of genet size and flowering stage on fruit set in Iris pumila L. clones in wild. Acta Oecol 27: 93-98.
43. Vallejo-Marín M, O'Brien HE (2007). Correlated evolution of self-incompatibility and clonal reproduction in Solanum (Solanaceae). New Phytol 173: 415-421.
44. Vaughan SP, Russell K (2004). Characterization of novel microsatellites and development of multiplex PCR for large-scale population studies in wild cherry, Prunus avium. Mol Ecol Notes 4: 512-520.
45. Vaughan SP, Russell K, Sargent DJ, Tobutt KR (2006). Isolation of S locus F-box alleles in Prunus avium and their application in a novel method to determine self-incompatibility genotype. Theor Appl Genet 112: 856-866.
46. Vaughan SP, Cottrell JE, Moodley DJ, Connolly T, Russell K (2007a). Distribution of fine-scale spatial-genetic structure in British wild cherry (Prunus avium L.). Heredity 98: 274-283.
47. Vaughan SP, Cottrell JE, Moodley DJ, Connolly T, Russell K (2007b). Clonal structure and recruitment in British wild cherry (Prunus avium L.). For Ecol Manag 242: 419-430.
48. Vaughan SP, Bošković RI, Gisbert-Climent A, Russell K, Tobutt KR (2008). Characterisation of novel S-alleles from cherry (Prunus avium L.). Tree Genet Genome 4: 531-541.
49. Wright S (1939). The distribution of self-sterility alleles in populations. Genetics 24: 538-552.