Comparison of comparative genomic hybridization technologies across microarray platforms

Journal of Biomolecular Techniques

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 135-151

  Hester, Susan D ^a   Reid, Laura ^b   Nowak, Norma ^c   Jones, Wendell D ^b   Parker, Joel S ^b   Knudtson, Kevin ^d   Ward, William ^a   Tiesman, Jay ^e   Denslow, Nancy D ^f  

^a U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^b Expression Analysis   (United States)

^c ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^e PROCTER AND GAMBLE COMPANY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

ArrayCGH; BAC array; HL 60

Indexed keywords

DNA; GENOMIC DNA;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENE DELETION; GENE LOCUS; GENE NUMBER; GENE REPLICATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HUMAN; MONOSOMY X; REPRODUCIBILITY; TRISOMY 18; ALGORITHM; BACTERIAL ARTIFICIAL CHROMOSOME; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CELL STRAIN HL 60; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CHROMOSOME DELETION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DNA MICROARRAY; ECONOMICS; GENE DOSAGE; HUMAN GENOME; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION; STANDARD;

ALGORITHMS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; CHROMOSOME DELETION; CHROMOSOMES, ARTIFICIAL, BACTERIAL; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; GENE DOSAGE; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME, HUMAN; HL-60 CELLS; HUMANS; NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TECHNIQUES; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; REFERENCE STANDARDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 68249157096     PISSN: 15240215     EISSN: 19434731     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Auer H, Newsom DL, Nowak NJ, et al. Gene-resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using oligonucleotide expression microarrays. BMC Genomics 2007;8:111.
2. Lockwood W, Chari R, Chi B, Lam W. Recent advances in array comparative genomic hybridization technologies and their applications in human genetics. Eur J Hum Genet 2005;14:139-148.
3. Stranger BE, Forrest MS, Dunning M, et al. Relative impact of nucleotide and copy number variation on gene expression phenotypes. Science 2007;315:848-853.
4. Huang J, Wei W, Zhang J, et al. Whole genome DNA copy number changes identified by high density oligonucleotide arrays. Hum Genomics 2004;1:287-299.
5. Komura D, Shen F, Ishikawa S, et al. Genome-wide detection of human copy number variations using high-density DNA oligonucleotide arrays. Genome Res 2006;16:1575-1584.
6. Redon R, Ishikawa S, Fitch KR, et al. Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature 2006;444(7118):444-454.
7. Zhao X, Li C, Paez JG, et al. An integrated view of copy number and allelic alterations in the cancer genome using single nucleotide polymorphism arrays. Cancer Res 2004;64:3060-71.
8. Albertson DG, Pinkel D. Genomic microarrays in human genetic disease and cancer. Hum Mol Genet 2003;12 Spec No 2:R145-152.
9. Coe BP, Ylstra B, Carvalho B, Meijer GA, Macaulay C, Lam WL. Resolving the resolution of array CGH. Genomics 2007;89:647-53.
10. Davies JJ, Wilson IM, Lam WL. Array CGH technologies and their applications to cancer genomes. Chromosome Res 2005;13:237-248.
11. Okazaki Y, Okuizumi H, Sasaki N, et al. An expanded system of restriction landmark genomic scanning (RLGS Ver. 1.8). Electrophoresis 1995;16:197-202.
12. Birnie GD. The HL60 cell line: a model system for studying human myeloid cell differentiation. Br J Cancer (Suppl) 1988;9:41-45.
13. Ulger C, Toruner GA, Alkan M, et al. Comprehensive genome-wide comparison of DNA and RNA level scan using microarray technology for identification of candidate cancer-related genes in the HL-60 cell line. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2003;147:28-35.
14. Peiffer DA, Le JM, Frank J, et al. High-resolution genomic profiling of chromosomal aberrations using Infinium whole-genome genotyping. Genome Res 2006;16:1136-1148.
15. Nowak NJ, Snijders AM, Conroy JM, Albertson DG. The BAC resource: Tools for array CGH and FISH. In Haines JL, Bruce R. Korf BR, Morton CC, et al. (eds): Current Protocols in Human Genetics. NY: Wiley, 2005:Unit 4.13.
16. Nowak NJ, Gaile D, Conroy JM, et al. Genome-wide aberrations in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2005;161:36-50.
17. Snijders AM, Nowak N, Segraves R, et al. Assembly of microarrays for genome-wide measurement of DNA copy number. Nat Genet 2001;29:263-264.
18. Miliaras D, Conroy J, Pervana S, Meditskou S, McQuaid D, Nowak N. Karyotypic changes detected by comparative genomic hybridization in a stillborn infant with chorioangioma and liver hemangioma. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2007;79:236-241.
19. Iafrate AJ, Feuk L, Rivera MN, et al. Detection of large-scale variation in the human genome. Nat Genet 2004;36:949-951.
20. Sebat J, Lakshmi B, Troge J, et al. Large-scale copy number polymorphism in the human genome. Science 2004;305:525-528.
21. Sharp AJ, Locke DP, McGrath SD, et al. Segmental duplications and copy-number variation in the human genome. Am J Hum Genet 2005;77:78-88.
22. Tuzun E, Sharp AJ, Bailey JA, et al. Fine-scale structural variation of the human genome. Nat Genet 2005;37:727-732.
23. Irizarry RA, Hobbs B, Collin F, et al. Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics 2003;4(2):249-264.
24. Lai WR, Johnson MD, Kucherlapati R, Park PJ. Comparative analysis of algorithms for identifying amplifications and deletions in array CGH data. Bioinformatics 2005;21:3763-3770.
25. Picard F, Robin S, Lavielle M, Vaisse C, Daudin JJ. A statistical approach for array CGH data analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 2005;6:27.
26. Olshen AB, Venkatraman ES. Circular binary segmentation for the analysis of array-based DNA copy number data. Biostatistics 2004;5:557-572.
27. Gallagher R, Collins S, Trujillo J, et al. Characterization of the continuous, differentiating myeloid cell line (HL-60) from a patient with acute promyelocytic leukemia. Blood 1979;54:713-733.
28. Roschke AV, Tonon G, Gehlhaus KS, et al. Karyotypic complexity of the NCI-60 drug-screening panel. Cancer Res 2003;63:8634-8647.
29. Wicker N, Carles A, Mills IG, et al. A new look towards BAC-based array CGH through a comprehensive comparison with oligo-based array CGH. BMC Genomics 2007;8:84.
30. Bauters M, Van Esch, H, Marynen P, Froyen G. X chromosome array-CGH for the identification of novel X-linked mental retardation genes. Eur J Med Genet 2005;48:263-275.