Building and assessing atomic models of proteins from structural templates: Learning and benchmarks

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 76, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 930-945

  Vallat, Brinda Kizhakke ^a   Pillardy, Jaroslaw ^b   Májek, Peter ^c   Meller, Jaroslaw ^d,e   Blom, Thomas ^a   Cao, BaoQiang ^a   Elber, Ron ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^c Department of Computer Science and School of Operations Research and Information Engineering   (United States)

^d CINCINNATI CHILDREN S HOSPITAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Feature selection; Homology modeling; Mathematical programming; Structure determination

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; INFORMATION SERVICE; LEARNING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; ONLINE SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DATA BANK; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; QUALITY CONTROL; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; TRAINING;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN;

EID: 68149132088     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22401     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:235-242.
2. Vallat BK, Pillardy J, Elber R. A template-finding algorithm and a comprehensive benchmark for homology modeling of proteins. Proteins 2008;72:910-928. (Pubitemid 352000869)
3. Eswar N, Mari-Renom M, Webb B, Madhusudhan MS, Eramian D, Shen M, Pieper U, Sali A. Comparative protein structure modeling with modeller. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 2006;5.6:5.6.1-5.6.30.
4. Qiu J, Elber R. SSALN: An alignment algorithm using structuredependent substitution matrices and gap penalties learned from structurally aligned protein pairs. Proteins 2006;62:881-891. (Pubitemid 43364153)
5. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C. SCOP - a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 1995;247:536-540.
6. Chun-Nam JY, Thorsten J, Elber R. Support Vector Training of Protein Alignment Models. Lecture notes in bioinformatics: RECOMB 2007, 2007. (Pubitemid 47164545)
7. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:2302-2309. (Pubitemid 41439897)
8. Moult J. A decade of CASP: progress, bottlenecks and prognosis in protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2005;15:285-289. (Pubitemid 40826447)
9. Kryshtafovych A, Venclovas C, Fidelis K, Moult J. Progress over the first decade of CASP experiments. Proteins 2005;61:225-236. (Pubitemid 43069977)
10. Adamczak R, Porollo A, Meller J. Accurate prediction of solvent accessibility using neural networks-based regression. Proteins 2004;56:753-767. (Pubitemid 39063318)
11. Adamczak R, Porollo A, Meller J. Combining prediction of secondary structure and solvent accessibility in proteins. Proteins 2005;59:467-475. (Pubitemid 40594291)
12. Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure- pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 1983;22:2577-2637.
13. Meller J, Elber R. Linear programming optimization and a double statistical filter for protein threading protocols. Proteins: Struct Funct Genet 2001;45:241-261. (Pubitemid 32988586)
14. Meller J, Elber R. Protein recognition by sequence-to-structure fitness: bridging efficiency and capacity of threading models. In: Friesner RA, editor. Computational methods for protein folding: a special volume of advances in chemical physics, Vol.20. New York: Wiley; 2002. pp 77-130.
15. Karplus K, Karchin R, Shackelford G, Hughey R. Calibrating E-values for hidden Markov models using reverse-sequence null models. Bioinformatics 2005;21:4107-4115. (Pubitemid 41672100)
16. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang JH, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25: 3389-3402. (Pubitemid 27359211)
17. Jian Qiu, Ron Elber. Atomically detailed potentials to recognize native and approximate protein structures. Proteins 2005;61:44-55.
18. Tobi D, Elber R. Distance dependent, pair potential for protein folding: Results from linear optimization. Proteins 2000;41:40-116 (Pubitemid 30666911)
19. Májek P, Elber R. A coarse grained potential for fold recognition and molecular dynamics simulations of proteins. Proteins, in press.
20. Adamczak R, Meller J. On the transferability of folding and threading potentials and sequence-independent filters for protein folding simulations. Mol Phys 2004;102:1291-1305.
21. Adamczak R, Meller J. Efficient and accurate protein model quality assessment with structural profiles, in press.
22. Wagner M, Meller J, Elber R. Large-scale linear programming techniques for the design of protein folding potentials. Math Program 2004;101:301-318.
23. Meller J, Wagner M, Elber R. Maximum feasibility guideline in the design and analysis of protein folding potentials. J Comput Chem 2002;23:111-118. (Pubitemid 34063135)
24. Cristianini N, Shawe-Taylor J. An introduction to support Vector Machines and other kernel based learning methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
25. Karlin S, Altschul SF. Applications and statistics for multiple highscoring segments in molecular sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993;90:5873-5877. (Pubitemid 23176265)