Toward a wide-field retinal prosthesis

Journal of Neural Engineering

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2009, Pages

  Ameri, Hossein ^a   Ratanapakorn, Tanapat ^b   Ufer, Stefan ^c   Eckhardt, Helmut ^c   Humayun, Mark S ^a   Weiland, James D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b KHON KAEN UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^c Venture II   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURRENT ELECTRODES; ELECTRODE ARRAYS; ENUCLEATED PORCINE EYE; EYE MODEL; FLEXIBLE POLYIMIDE; LOW VISION; OBJECT DISCRIMINATION; RETINAL PROSTHESIS; SIMULATION STUDIES; STRONG CORRELATION; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL LOSS; WIDE FIELD;

ANIMALS; OPHTHALMOLOGY; POLYIMIDES; PROSTHETICS; SIMULATORS; VISION;

ALDEHYDES;

ARTICLE; ELECTRODE; EYE; HUMAN; PERIPHERAL VISION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; RETINAL PROSTHESIS; SIMULATION; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; VISUAL PROSTHESIS; WALKING DIFFICULTY; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; BLINDNESS; ELECTROSTIMULATION THERAPY; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; INSTRUMENTATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES;

ANIMALIA; SUS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; BLINDNESS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION THERAPY; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RETINA; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 68049137782     PISSN: 17412560     EISSN: 17412552     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/6/3/035002     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Kim S Y et al 2002 Morphometric analysis of the macula in eyes with geographic atrophy due to age-related macular degeneration Retina 22 464-70
2. Santos A et al 1997 Preservation of the inner retina in retinitis pigmentosa. A morphometric analysis Arch. Ophthalmol. 115 511-5
3. Marc R E and Jones B W 2003 Retinal remodeling in inherited photoreceptor degenerations Mol. Neurobiol. 28 139-47
4. Humayun M S et al 1996 Visual perception elicited by electrical stimulation of retina in blind humans Arch. Ophthalmol. 114 40-6
5. Rizzo J F 3rd et al 2003 Perceptual efficacy of electrical stimulation of human retina with a microelectrode array during short-term surgical trials Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 44 5362-9
6. Yanai D et al 2007 Visual performance using a retinal prosthesis in three subjects with retinitis pigmentosa Am. J. Ophthalmol. 143 820-7
7. Marron J A and Bailey I L 1982 Visual factors and orientation-mobility performance Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 59 413-26
8. Jones T and Troscianko T 2006 Mobility performance of low-vision adults using an electronic mobility aid Clin. Exp. Optom. 89 10-7
9. Hassan S E, Lovie-Kitchin J E and Woods R L 2002 Vision and mobility performance of subjects with age-related macular degeneration Optom. Vis. Sci. 79 697-707
10. Brown B et al 1986 Contribution of vision variables to mobility in age-related maculopathy patients Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 63 733-9
11. Geruschat D R, Turano K A and Stahl J W 1998 Traditional measures of mobility performance and retinitis pigmentosa Optom. Vis. Sci. 75 525-37
12. Szlyk J P et al 1997 Relationship between difficulty in performing daily activities and clinical measures of visual function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa Arch. Ophthalmol. 115 53-9
13. Turano K A, Rubin G S and Quigley H A 1999 Mobility performance in glaucoma Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 40 2803-9
14. Friedman D S et al 2007 Glaucoma and mobility performance: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project Ophthalmology 114 2232-7
15. Haymes S et al 1996 Mobility of people with retinitis pigmentosa as a function of vision and psychological variables Optom. Vis. Sci. 73 621-37 (Pubitemid 26378215)
16. Szlyk J P et al 2001 Perceived and actual performance of daily tasks: relationship to visual function tests in individuals with retinitis pigmentosa Ophthalmology 108 65-75
17. Turano K A et al 2004 Association of visual field loss and mobility performance in older adults: Salisbury Eye Evaluation Study Optom. Vis. Sci. 81 298-307
18. Burstedt M S, Monestam E and Sandgren O 2005 Associations between specific measures of vision and vision-related quality of life in patients with Bothnia dystrophy, a defined type of retinitis pigmentosa Retina 25 317-23
19. Holm O C 1970 A simple method for widening restricted visual fields Arch. Ophthalmol. 84 611-2
20. Kozlowski J M, Mainster M A and Avila M P 1984 Negative-lens field expander for patients with concentric field constriction Arch. Ophthalmol. 102 1182-4
21. Hoeft W W et al 1985 Amorphic lenses: a mobility aid for patients with retinitis pigmentosa Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 62 142-8
22. Cha K, Horch K W and Normann R A 1992 Mobility performance with a pixelized vision system Vis. Res. 32 1367-72
23. Dagnelie G et al 2007 Real and virtual mobility performance in simulated prosthetic vision J. Neural Eng. 4 S92-101
24. Tychsen L 1992 Binocular vision Adler's Physiology of the Eye ed W M Hart (St Louis: Mosby Year Book) pp 773-853
25. Majji A B et al 1999 Long-term histological and electrophysiological results of an inactive epiretinal electrode array implantation in dogs Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 40 2073-81
26. Peyman G et al 1998 Subretinal semiconductor microphotodiode array Ophthalmic. Surg. Lasers 29 234-41
27. Kerdraon Y A et al 2002 Development and surgical implantation of a vision prosthesis model into the ovine eye Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 30 36-40
28. Mahadevappa M et al 2005 Perceptual thresholds and electrode impedance in three retinal prosthesis subjects IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 13 201-6
29. Terasawa Y et al 2006 The development of a multichannel electrode array for retinal prostheses J. Artif. Organs 9 263-6
30. Johnson L et al 2007 Impedance-based retinal contact imaging as an aid for the placement of high resolution epiretinal prostheses J. Neural Eng. 4 S17-23
31. Gerding H, Benner F P and Taneri S 2007 Experimental implantation of epiretinal retina implants (EPI-RET) with an IOL-type receiver unit J. Neural Eng. 4 S38-49
32. Loudin J D et al 2007 Optoelectronic retinal prosthesis: system design and performance J. Neural Eng. 4 S72-84
33. Schanze T et al 2007 An optically powered single-channel stimulation implant as test system for chronic biocompatibility and biostability of miniaturized retinal vision prostheses IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 54 983-92
34. Gekeler F et al 2007 Compound subretinal prostheses with extra-ocular parts designed for human trials: successful long-term implantation in pigs Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 245 230-41
35. Walter P and Mokwa W 2005 Epiretinal visual prostheses Ophthalmologe 102 933-40
36. Cha K, Horch K and Normann R A 1992 Simulation of a phosphene-based visual field: visual acuity in a pixelized vision system Ann. Biomed. Eng. 20 439-49
37. Hayes J S et al 2003 Visually guided performance of simple tasks using simulated prosthetic vision Artif. Organs 27 1016-28
38. Palanker D et al 2005 Design of a high-resolution optoelectronic retinal prosthesis J. Neural Eng. 2 S105-20
39. Humayun M S et al 1999 Morphometric analysis of the extramacular retina from postmortem eyes with retinitis pigmentosa Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 40 143-8
40. Humayun M S et al 1999 Pattern electrical stimulation of the human retina Vis. Res. 39 2569-76
41. Faye E 1976 Clinical Low Vision (Boston: Little, Brown) pp 233-48
42. Yeh S, Colyer M H and Weichel E D 2008 Current trends in the management of intraocular foreign bodies Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 19 225-33
43. Valesova L et al 2003 Primary pars plana vitrectomy in the treatment of penetrating eye injuries involving intraocular foreign bodies in the vitreous body Cesk. Slov. Oftalmol. 59 228-38
44. Farr A K et al 2001 Open globe injuries in children: a retrospective analysis J. Pediatr. Ophthalmol. Strabismus 38 72-7
45. Gopal L et al 1998 Management of glass intraocular foreign bodies Retina 18 213-20
46. El-Asrar A M et al 1998 Retinal detachment after posterior segment intraocular foreign body injuries Int. Ophthalmol. 22 369-75