Mobility of people with retinitis pigmentosa as a function of vision and psychological variables

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 73, Issue 10, 1996, Pages 621-637

  Haymes, Sharon ^a   Guest, Daryl ^a   Heyes, Anthony ^b   Johnston, Alan ^b  

^a Victorian College of Optometry   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

contrast sensitivity; functional performance; low vision; mobility; personality; psychological variables; retinitis pigmentosa; visual field

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; CORRELATION METHODS; DISEASES; SUBJECTIVE TESTING;

CONCENTRIC FIELD RATING; PELLI-ROBINSON CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; RESIDUAL VISUAL FIELD; RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA;

VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; RATING SCALE; RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA; SCORING SYSTEM; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA; VISION; VISION, LOW; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0030273596     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199610000-00001     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Brown B, Brabyn JA. Mobility and low vision: a review. Clin Exp Optom 1987;70:96-101.
2. Haymes SA, Guest DJ, Heyes AD, Johnston AW. The relationship of vision and psychological variables to the orientation and mobility of visually impaired persons. Accepted for publication J Vis Impairment Blind 1996;90:314-24.
3. Marron JA, Bailey IL. Visual factors and orientation-mobility performance. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1982;59:413-26.
4. Long RG, Rieser JJ, Hill EW. Mobility in individuals with moderate visual impairments. J Vis Impairment Blind 1990;84:111-8.
5. Brown B, Brabyn L, Welch L, Haegerstrom-Portnoy G, Colenbrander A. Contribution of vision variables to mobility in age-related maculopathy patients. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1986;63:733-9.
6. Beggs WDA. Psychological correlates of walking speed in the visually impaired. Ergonomics 1991;34:91-102.
7. Lovie-Kitchin J, Mainstone J, Robinson J, Brown B. What areas of the visual field are important for mobility in low vision patients? Clin Vision Sci 1990;5:249-63.
8. Clark-Carter DD, Heyes AD, Howarth CI. The efficiency and walking speed of visually impaired people. Ergonomics 1986;29:779-89.
9. Dodds AG, Bailey P, Pearson A, Yates L. Psychological factors in acquired visual impairment: the development of a scale of adjustment. J Vis Impairment Blind 1991;85:306-10.
10. Jiménez-Sierra JM, Ogden TE, Van Boemel GB. Inherited Retinal Diseases: A Diagnostic Guide. St Louis: The CV Mosby Company, 1989:118-72.
11. Johnston AW. Science and skills in low vision for the practitioner. In: Proceedings of the Southern Educational Congress of Optometry. Atlanta: Southern Council of Optometrists, 1994:199-203.
12. Clark-Carter DD. Factors affecting blind mobility. 1985. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Nottingham.
13. Dodds AG, Clark-Carter DD, Howarth CI. Improving objective measures of mobility. J Vis Impairment Blind 1983;77:438-42.
14. Dodds AG, Davis DP. Assessment and training of low vision clients for mobility. J Vis Impairment Blind 1989;83:439-46.
15. Bailey IL, Lovie JE. New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1976;53:740-5.
16. Verbaken JH, Johnston AW. Population norms for edge contrast sensitivity. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1986;63:724-32.
17. Pelli DG, Robson JG, Wilkins AJ. The design of a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. Clin Vision Sci 1988;2:187-99.
18. Anderson DR. Perimetry With and Without Automation. St Louis: The CV Mosby Company, 1987:30-40.
19. Ross JE. The functional aspects of visual disorder. 1983. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Oxford.
20. Colenbrander A, Lieberman MFF, Schainholtz DC. Preliminary Implementation of the Functional Vision Score System on the Humphrey Field Analyzer. In: Mills Rp, ed. Perimetry Update 1992/1993. Proceedings of the Xth International Perimetric Society Meeting, Kyoto, October 20-23, 1992. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Kugler Publications, 1993:487-96.
21. Esterman B. Functional scoring of the binocular field. Ophthalmology (Rochester) 1982;89:1226-34.
22. Wässle H, Grünert U, Röhrenbeck J, Boycott B. Retinal ganglion cell density and cortical magnification factor in the primate. Vision Res 1990;30:1897-911.
23. Pelli DG. The visual requirements of mobility. In: Woo GC, ed. Low Vision - Principles and Applications. New York: Springer, 1986:134-6.
24. Genensky SM, Berry SH, Bikson TH, Bikson TK. Visual environmental adaptation problems of the partially sighted: final report (No. CPS-100-HEW). Santa Monica: Center for the Partially Sighted, 1979.
25. Heckenlively JR, Kraus HR. Visual fields in retinitis pigmentosa. In: Heckenlively JR, ed. Retinitis Pigmentosa. Philadelphia: JB Lippincroft Company, 1988:25-36.
26. Costa PT Jr, McCrae RR. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional Manual. Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc, 1992.
27. McAdams DP. The five-factor model in personality: a critical appraisal. J Pers 1992;60:329-61.
28. McCrae RR, Costa PT Jr. More reasons to adopt the five-factor model. Am Psychologist 1989;44:451-2.
29. Tinsley HEA. NEO Personality Inventory - Revised. In: Keyser DJ, Sweetland RC, eds. Test Critiques, vol X. Austin, Texas: Pro-Ed Inc, 1994:443-56.
30. Costa PT Jr, McCrae RR, Dye DA. Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: a revision of the NEO Personality Inventory. Person Individ Diff 1991;12:887-98.
31. Swallow R. Fifty assessment instruments commonly used with blind and partially seeing individuals. J Vis Impairment Blind 1981;75:65-72.
32. Partridge C, Johnston M. Perceived control of recovery from physical disability: measurement and prediction. Br J Clin Psychol 1989;28:53-9.
33. Parsons S. Locus of control and adaptive behaviour in visually impaired children. J Vis Impairment Blind 1987;81:429-32.
34. Australian Council for Educational Research. ACER Higher Tests ML-MQ and PL-PQ: Manual. Hawthorn, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research, 1981.
35. Educational Testing Services. Annotated Bibliography of Tests: Blind and Visually Handicapped. Princeton, New Jersey: Educational Testing Service, 1985.
36. Haymes SA, Guest DJ, Heyes AD, Johnston AW. Comparison of functional mobility performance with clinical vision measures in simulated retinitis pigmentosa. Optom Vis Sci 1994;71:442-53.
37. Lie I. Relation of visual acuity to illumination, contrast and distance in the partially sighted. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1977;54:528-36.
38. Sloan LL. Variation of acuity with luminance in ocular diseases and anomalies. Doc Ophthalmol 1969;26:384-93.
39. White K, Carroll R, Martin W Jr. Personality factors associated with the decision to accept or reject mobility training. J Vis Impairment Blind 1990;84:470-4.