Subretinal semiconductor microphotodiode array

Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 234-241

  Peyman, Gholam ^a   Chow, Alan Y ^b,e   Liang, Chanping ^a   Chow, Vincent Y ^e   Perlman, Jay I ^c,d   Peachey, Neal S ^c,d  

^a LSU EYE CENTER   (United States)

^b Optobionics Corporation   (United States)

^c HINES VA HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

^e NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; DIODE; IMPLANTATION; INFRARED RADIATION; NONHUMAN; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABBIT; SEMICONDUCTOR; SUBRETINAL FLUID;

ANIMALS; LIGHT; MICROELECTRODES; PHOTOCHEMISTRY; PHOTOTRANSDUCTION; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RABBITS; RETINA; SEMICONDUCTORS;

EID: 0031940997     PISSN: 10823069     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Sharma RK, Bergström A, Ehinger B. Retinal cell transplants. Progr Ret Eye Res. 1995;15:197-230.
2. Brindley GS, Lewin WS. The sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the visual cortex. J Physiol. 1968;196:479-493.
3. Potts AM, Inoue J, Buffum D. The electrically evoked response of the visual system (EER). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1968;7:269-278.
4. Carpenter RHS. Electrical stimulation of the human eye in different adaptational states. J Physiol. 1972;221:137-148.
5. Knighton RW. An electrically evoked slow potential of the frog's retina: I. Properties of the response. J Neurophysiol. 1975;38:185-197.
6. Knighton RW. An electrically evoked slow potential of the frog's retina: II. Identification with PII component of electroretinogram. J Neurophysiol. 1975;38: 198-209.
7. Dawson WW, Radtke ND. The electrical stimulation of the retina by indwelling electrodes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1977;16:249-252.
8. Chow AY, Chow VY. Subretinal electrical stimulation of the rabbit retina. Neurosci Lett. 1997;225:13-16.
9. Dobelle WH, Mladejovsky MG, Girvin JP. Artificial vision for the blind: electrical stimulation of the cortex offers hope for a functional prosthesis. Science. 1974;183:440-444.
10. Schmidt EM, Bak MJ, Hambrecht FT, Kufta CV, O'Rourke DK, Vallabhanath P. Feasibility of a visual prosthesis for the blind based on intracortical microstimulation of the visual cortex. Brain. 1996; 119:507-522.
11. Humayun MS, de Juan E Jr, Dagnelie G, Greenberg RJ, Propst RH, Philips H. Visual perception elicited by electrical stimulation of retina in blind humans. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114:40-46.
12. Humayun M, Sato Y, Propst R, de Juan E Jr. Can potentials from the visual cortex be elicited electrically despite severe retinal degeneration and a markedly reduced electroretinogram? Ger J Ophthalmol. 1995;4: 57-64.
13. Wässle H, Boycott BB. Functional architecture of the mammalian retina. Physiol Rev. 1991;71:447-480.
14. Chow AY. Electrical stimulation of the rabbit retina wich subretinal electrodes and high density microphotodiode array implants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:835. Abstract.
15. Flannery JG, Farber DB, Bird AC, Bok D. Degenerative changes in a retina affected with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1989;30:191-211.
16. Santos A, Humayun MS, de Juan E Jr, et al. Preservation of the inner retina in retinitis pigmentosa: a morphometric analysis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997; 115:511-515.
17. Uehara F, Yasumura D, LaVail MM. Rod-and cone-associated interphotoreceptor matrix in the rat retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:285-291.
18. Brady GS, Clauser HR. Materials Handbook, ed. 13. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1991:739-740.
19. Chow AY, Chow VY, Peachey NS. Charge densities needed for induction of retinal and cortical potentials by stimulation with subretinal electrodes and implanted semiconductor microphotodiode arrays. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37(suppl):349. Abstract.