Faculty evaluation of surgery clerkship students: Important components of written comments

Academic Medicine

Volumn 77, Issue 10 SUPPL., 2002, Pages

  Plymale, Margaret A ^a   Donnelly, Michael B ^a   Lawton, Jeffrey ^a   Pulito, Andrew R ^a   Mentzer, Robert M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EDUCATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL EXAMINATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; SCORING SYSTEM; SKILL; SURGICAL TRAINING; TASK PERFORMANCE; UNIVERSITY;

EID: 0036792967     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200210001-00015     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Pulito A, Donnelly MB, Plymale MA. Important factors in faculty evaluation of medical student performance. Paper presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the Association for Surgical Education, Nashville, TN, April 2001.
2. Hemmer PA, Pangaro L. The effectiveness of formal evaluation sessions during clinical clerkships in better identifying students with marginal funds of knowledge. Acad Med. 1997;72:641-3.
3. Hemmer PA, Hawkins R, Jackson JL, Pangaro LN. Assessing how well three evaluation methods detect deficiencies in medical students' professionalism in two settings of an internal medicine clerkship. Acad Med. 2000;75:167-73.
4. Elzubeit MA, Rizk DEE. Identifying characteristics that students, interns and residents look for in their role models. Med Educ. 2001;35:272-7.
5. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1998.
6. Fleiss JL. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1981.
7. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.