Theoretical borderlands: Using multiple theoretical perspectives to challenge inequitable power structures in student development theory

Journal of College Student Development

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 141-156

  Abes, Elisa S ^a  

^a MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67651240441     PISSN: 08975264     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/csd.0.0059     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abes, E. S. (2007). Applying queer theory in practice with college students: Transformation of a researcher's and participant's perspectives on identity. Journal of LGBT Youth, 5(1), 57-77.
2. Abes, E. S., &Jones, S. R. (2004). Meaning-making capacity and the dynamics of lesbian college students' multiple dimensions of identity. Journal of College Student Development 45, 612-632.
3. Abes, E. S., Jones, S. R., &McEwen, M. K. (2007). Reconceptualizing the model of multiple dimensions of identity: The role of meaning-making capacity in the construction of multiple identities. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 1-22.
4. Abes, E. S., &Kasch, D. (2007). Using queer theory to explore lesbian college students' multiple dimensions of identity. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 619-636.
5. Anzaldua, G. (1999). Borderlands: La frontera (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.
6. Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2001). Making their own way: Narratives for transforming higher education to promote self-development (1st ed.). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
7. Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2004). Evolution of a constructivist conceptualization of epistemological reflection. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 31-42.
8. Baxter Magolda, M. B., &King, P. M. (2007). Interview strategies for assessing self-authorship: Constructing conversations to assess meaning making. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 491-508.
9. Britzman, D. P. (1997). What is this thing called love? New discourses for understanding gay and lesbian youth. In S. de Castell &M. Bryson (Eds.), Radical in(ter)ventions: Identity, politics, and difference/s on educational praxis (pp. 183-207). Albany: State University of New York Press.
10. Britzman, D. P. (2000). "The question of belief ": Writing poststructual ethnography. In E. A. St. Pierre &W. S. Pillow (2000). Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education (pp. 27-40). New York: Routledge.
11. Broido, E. M., &Manning, K. (2002). Philosophical foundations and current theoretical perspectives in qualitative research. Journal of College Student Development, 43, 434-445.
12. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
13. Cass, V. C. (1979). Homosexual identity formation: A theoretical model. Journal of Homosexuality, 4, 219-235.
14. Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Davis, T. L. (2002). Voices of gender role conflict: The social construction of college men's identity. Journal of College Student Development, 43, 508-521.
16. Denzin, N. K., &Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin &Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1-28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Dilley, P. (2002). Queer man on campus: A history of non-heterosexual college men, 1945-2000. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
18. Donmoyer, R. (2006). Take my paradigm ⋯ please! The legacy of Kuhn's construct in educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(1), 11-34.
19. Fine, M., Weis, L., Weseen, S., Wong, L. (2000). Qualitative research, representations, and social responsibilities. In N. K. Denzin &Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 107-131). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Gamson, J. (2000). Sexualities, queer theory, and qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin &Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 347-365). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Guba, E. G, &Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin &Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 191-215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Halberstram, J. (2005). In a queer time and place: Transgender bodies and subcultural lives. New York: New York University Press.
23. Jones, S. R., Arminio, J., Broido, E., &Torres, V. (2002). Adding depth to an expanded horizon. Journal of College Student Development, 43, 431-433.
24. Jones, S. R., Torres, V., &Arminio, J. (2006). Negotiating the complexities of qualitative research in higher education: Fundamental elements and issues. New York: Routledge.
25. Kincheloe, J. L., &McLaren, P. (2005). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin &Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 303-342). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Kodama, C. M., McEwen, M. K., Liang, C. T. H., &Lee, S. (2002). An Asian American perspective on psychosocial student development theory. In M. K. McEwen, C. M. Kodama, A. N. Alvarez, S. Lee &C. T. H. Liang (Eds.), Working with Asian American college students (New Directions for Student Services No. 97, pp. 45-59). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
27. Kong, T. S. K., Mahoney, D., Plummer, K. (2002). Queering the interview. In J. F. Gubrium &J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 239-258). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Lather, P. (1991) . Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
29. Lather, P. (2006). Paradigm proliferation as a good thing to think with: Teaching research in education as wild profusion. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(1), 35-57.
30. Lather, P. (2007). Getting lost: Feminist efforts toward a double(d) science. Albany: State University of New York Press.
31. Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., &Zilber, T. (1998). Narrative research: Readings, analysis, interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. McEwen, M. (2003). The nature and uses of theory. In S. R. Komives, D. B. Woodard, Jr., &Associates (Eds.), Student services: A handbook for the profession (pp. 153-178). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
33. Muñoz, J. E. (1999). Disidentifications: Queers of color and the performance of politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
34. Pillow, W. (2003). Race-based methodologies: Multicultural methods or epistemological shifts. In G. R. López &L. Parker (Eds.). Interrogating racism in qualitative research methodology (pp. 181-202). New York: Peter Lang.
35. Pizzolato, J. E. (2003). Developing self-authorship: Exploring the experiences of high-risk college students. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 797-812.
36. Plummer, K. (2005). Critical humanism and queer theory: Living with the tensions. In N. K. Denzin &Y. S. Lincoln (Eds). The sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 357-386). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
37. Renn, K. A., &Bilodeau, B. (2005). Queer student leaders: An exploratory case study of identity development and LGBT student involvement at a Midwestern research university. Journal of Gay &Lesbian Issues in Education, 2(4), 49-71.
38. Richardson, L., &St. Pierre, E. A. (2005). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin &Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 959-978). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39. Stewart, D, L. (2002). The role of faith in the development of an integrated identity: A qualitative study of Black students at a White college. Journal of College Student Development, 43, 579-595.
40. Sullivan, N. (2003). A critical introduction to queer theory. New York: New York University Press.
41. Talburt, S. (2000). Subject to identity: Knowledge, sexuality, and academic practices in higher education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
42. Talburt, S. (2004). Ethnographic responsibility without the "real." The Journal of Higher Education, 75(1), 80-103.
43. Tanaka, G. (2002). Higher education's self-reflexive turn: Toward an intercultural theory of student development. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(2), 263-296.
44. Tierney, W. G. (1993). Building communities of difference: Higher education in the 21st century. Westport, CT: Bergin &Garvey.
45. Tierney, W. G. (1997). Academic outlaws: Queer theory and cultural studies in the academy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Tierney, W. G., &Rhoads, R. A. (1993). Postmodernism and critical theory in higher education: Implications for research and practice. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, v. 9 (pp. 308-343). New York: Agathon Press.
47. van Gennep, A. (1960). The rites of passage. (M. B. Vizedom &G. L. Caffe, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1909)
48. Warner, M. (1991). Introduction: Fear of a queer planet. Social Text, 29, 3-17.
49. Wolf, D. L. (1996). Situating feminist dilemmas in fieldwork. In D. L. Wolf (Ed.), Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork (pp. 1-55). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.