Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery

Quality and Safety in Health Care

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 81-88

  Dawson, Jill ^a,b   Fitzpatrick, Ray ^a,c   Murray, David ^c   Carr, Andrew ^b  

^a RADCLIFFE INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^b NUFFIELD ORTHOPAEDIC CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Health questionnaires; Outcomes; Patient satisfaction; Total hip replacement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HEALTH SURVEY; HIP PROSTHESIS; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; ORTHOPEDICS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARD; STATISTICS; UNITED KINGDOM;

ENGLAND; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HIP PROSTHESIS; HOSPITALS, SPECIAL; HUMANS; ORTHOPEDICS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 0030167686     PISSN: 09638172     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/qshc.5.2.81     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Ivory J, Summerfield J, Thorne S, Lowdon I, Williamson D. Total hip replacement. Quality in Health Care 1994; 3:114-9.
2. Laupacis A, Rorabeck C, Bourne R, Feeny D, Tugwell P, Sim D. Randomized trials in orthopaedics: why, how and when? J Bone Joint Surg 1989;71:535-43.
3. Gross M. Innovations in surgery: a proposal for phased clinical trials. J Bone Joint Surg 1993;75:351-4.
4. Willliams M, Newton J, Frankel S, Braddon F, Barclay E, Gray J. Prevalence of total hip replacement: how much demand has been met? J Epidemiol Community Health 1994;48:188-91.
5. Christel P, Djian P. Recent advances in adult hip joint surgery. Curr Opin Rheumatol 1994;6:161-71.
6. Murray D, Carr A, Bulstrode C. Survival analysis of joint replacements. J Bone Joint Surg 1993;75:697-704.
7. Liang M, Katz J, Phillips C, et al. The total hip arthroplast evaluation form of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg 1991;73:639-46.
8. Wright J, Rudicel S, Feinstein A. Ask patients what they want: evaluation of individual complaints before total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 1994;76:229-34.
9. Bulstrode C, Murray D, Carr A, Pynsent P, Carter S. Designer hips. BMJ 1993;306:732-3.
10. Liang M, Fossel A, Larson M. Comparison of five health status instruments for orthopaedic evaluation. Med Care 1990;28:632-42.
11. Cleary P, Reilly D, Greenfield S, Mulley A, Wexler L, Frankel F, et al. Using patient reports to assess health-related quality of life after total hip replacement. Quality of Life Research 1993;2:3-11.
12. O'Boyle C, McGee H, O'Malley K, Joyce C. Individual quality of life in patients undergoing hip replacement. Lancet 1992;339:1088-91.
13. Fletcher A, Gore S, Jones D, Fitzpatrick R, Spiegelhalter D, Cox D. Quality of life measures in health care II: design, analysis, and interpretation. BMJ 1992;305:1145-8.
14. Jenkinson C, Bardsley M, Lawrence K. Measurement in subjective health assessment: themes and prospects. In: C Jenkinson, ed. Measuring health and medical outcomes. London: UCL Press 1993;176-86.
15. Patrick D, Deyo R. Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care 1989;27:S217-32.
16. Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruements. J Chron Dis 1987;40:171-8.
17. Fitzpatrick R, Ziebland S, Jenkinson C, et al. Importance of sensitivity to change as a criterion for selecting health status measures. Quality in Health Care 1992;1:89-93.
18. Garratt A, Ruta D, Abdalla M, Russell I. SF 36 health status questionnaire II. Responsiveness to changes in health status in four common clinical conditions. Quality in Health Care 1994;3:186-92.
19. Liang M, Larson C, Cullen K, Schwartz J. Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis research. Arthritis Rheum 1985;28:542-7.
20. Wiklund I, Romanus B. A comparison of quality of life before and after arthroplasty in patients who had arthrosis of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg 1991;73:765-9.
21. Feinstein A, Wells C. A new clinical taxonomy for rating change in functional activities of patients with angina. Am Heart J 1977;93:172-82.
22. Deyo R, Inui T. Towards clinical applications of health status measures: sensitivity of scales to clinically important changes. Health Serv Res 1984;19:275-89.
23. Fitzpatrick R, Ziebland S, Jenkinson C, Mowat A, Mowat A. Transition questions to assess outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1993;32:807-11.
24. Meenan R, Gertman P, Mason J, Dunaif R. The arthritis impact measurement scales: further investigations of a health status measure. Arthritis Rheum 1982;25:1048-53.
25. Kay A, Davison B, Badley E, Wagstaff S. Hip arthroplasty: patient satisfaction. Br J Rheumatol 1983;22:243-9.
26. Steele R, Dempster D, Smith M. Total hip replacement of failed surface arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 1985; 56:133-4.
27. Stromberg C, Herberts P, Palmertz B. Cemented revision hip arthroplasty. A multicentre five to nine year study of 204 first revisions for loosening. Acta Orthop Scand 1992;63:139-42.
28. Charnley J. Long term results of low friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg 1972;54:61.
29. Ware J, Sherbourne C. The MOS 36 item short form health survey: 1 conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83.
30. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D. Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess patients' perceptions in relation to total hip replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg 1996;78:185-90.
31. Murray D. The hip. In: P Pynsent, J Fairbank, A Carr, eds. Outcome measures in orthopaedics 1993. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1993:198-227.
32. Callaghan J, Dysart S, Savory C, Hopkinson W. Assessing the results of hip replacement. A comparison of five different rating systems. J Bone Joint Surg 1990; 72:1008-9.
33. Ruta D, Abdalla M, Garratt A, Coutts A, Russell I. SF 36 health survey questionnaire: 1. Reliability in two patient based studies. Quality in Health Care 1994;3:180-5.
34. Brazier J, Harper R, Jones N, O'Cathain A, Thomas K, Usherwood T, Westlake L. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ 1992;305:160-4.
35. Meenan RF, Gertman PM, Mason JH. Measuring health status in arthritis: the arthritis impact measurement scales. Arthritis Rheum 1980;23:146-52.
36. Kazis L, Anderson J, Meenan R. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 1989;27(suppl): 178-89.
37. Hayes V, Morris J, Wolfe C, Morgan M. The SF-36 health survey questionnaire: is it suitable for use with older adults? Age Ageing 1995;24:120-5.
38. Amadio P. Outcome measurements: more questions, some answers. J Bone Joint Surg 1993;75:1583-4.
39. Radford P. In: P Pynsent, J Fairbank, A Carr, eds. Outcome measures in orthopaedics 1993. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1993:59-80.
40. Kazis L, Callaghan R, Meenan R, Pincus T. Health status reports in the care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Epidemiol 1990;43:1243-53.
41. Shanks J, Frater A. Health status, outcome and attributability: is a red rose red in the dark. Quality in Health Care 1993;2:259-62.
42. Bardsley M, Venables C, Watson J, Goodfellow J, Wright P. Evidence for validity of a health status measure in assessing short term outcomes of cholecystectomy. Quality in Health Care 1992;1:10-4.
43. Wasson J, Keller A, Rubenstein L, Hays R, Nelson E, Johnson D. Benefits and obstacles of health status assessment in ambulatory settings. Med Care 1992;30: MS42-9.
44. Lansky D, Butler J, Waller F. Using health status measures in the hospital setting. Med Care 1992;30:MS57-73.
45. Fitzpatrick R, Ziebland S, Jenkinson C, Mowat A, Mowat A. A comparison of the sensitivity to change of several health status instruments in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1993;20:429-36.
46. Katz J, Larson M, Phillips C, Fossel A, Liang M. Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments. Med Care 1992;30:917-25.
47. Bombadier C, Melfi C, Paul J, Green R, Hawker G, Wright J, et al. Comparison of a generic and a disease-specific measure of pain and physical function after knee replacement surgery. Med Care 1995;33:5131-44.