|
Volumn 42, Issue 1 Suppl, 2004, Pages
|
Comparing alternative Rasch-based methods vs raw scores in measuring change in health.
a a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
AGED;
ARTICLE;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW UP;
HEALTH STATUS;
HIP ARTHROPLASTY;
HUMAN;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
MIDDLE AGED;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT;
PAIN ASSESSMENT;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
PROBABILITY;
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;
PSYCHOMETRY;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
QUESTIONNAIRE;
SELF CONCEPT;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
STANDARD;
STATISTICS;
THEORETICAL MODEL;
TIME;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW-UP STUDIES;
HEALTH STATUS;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
MODELS, THEORETICAL;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE);
PAIN MEASUREMENT;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
PROBABILITY;
PSYCHOMETRICS;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
QUESTIONNAIRES;
SELF EFFICACY;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
TIME FACTORS;
|
EID: 1342290216
PISSN: 00257079
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000103530.13056.88 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (135)
|
References (0)
|