Natural selection in Potentilla glandulosa revisited

Evolutionary Ecology Research

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 105-119

  Núñez Farfán, Juan ^a,b   Schlichting, Carl D ^b  

^a INSTITUTO DE ECOLOGÍA   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Ecological genetics; Local adaptation; Natural selection; Population differentiation; Potentilla glandulosa; Reaction norms

Indexed keywords

EID: 14844339525     PISSN: 15220613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Antonovics, J. 1987. The evolutionary dys-synthesis: which bottles for which wine? Am. Nat., 129: 321-331.
2. Bumpus, H. 1899. The elimination of the unfit as illustrated by the introduced sparrow, Passer domesticus. Mar. Biol. Lab. (Woods Hole) Biol. Lectures, 209-228.
3. Clausen, J. and Hiesey, W.M. 1958. Experimental Studies on the Nature of Species. IV. Genetic Structure of Ecological Races. Publication #615. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington.
4. Clausen, J., Keck, D.D. and Hiesey, W.M. 1938. Experimental taxonomy. Carnegie Inst. Wash., Year Book, 37: 218-222.
5. Clausen, J., Keck, D.D. and Hiesey, W.M. 1940. Experimental Studies on the Nature of Species. I. Effect of Varied Environments on Western North American Plants. Publication #520. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington.
6. Clausen, J., Keck, D.D. and Hiesey, W.M. 1948. Experimental Studies on the Nature of Species. III. Environmental Responses of Climatic Races of Achillea. Publication #581. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington.
7. Cook, L.M. 2000. Changing views on melanic moths. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 69: 431-441.
8. Endler, J.A. 1986. Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9. Ford, E.B. 1964. Ecological Genetics. London: Methuen.
10. Futuyma, D.J. 1988. Stürm und drang and the evolutionary synthesis. Evolution, 42: 217-226.
11. Gould, S.J. and Lewontin, R.C. 1979. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 205: 581-598.
12. Haldane, J.B.S. 1954. The measurement of natural selection. Caryiologia, suppl.: 480-487.
13. Janzen, F.J. and Stern, H.S. 1998. Logistic regression for empirical studies of multivariate selection. Evolution, 52: 1564-1571.
14. Jordan, N. 1991. Multivariate analysis of selection in experimental populations derived from hybridization of two ecotypes of the annual plant Diodia teres W. (Rubiaceae). Evolution, 45: 1760-1772.
15. Kettlewell, H.B.D. 1955. Selection experiments on industrial melanism in the lepidoptera. Heredity, 9: 323-342.
16. Kingsolver, L.G., Hoekstra, H.E., Hoekstra, J.M. et al. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat., 157: 245-261.
17. Lande, R. and Arnold S.J. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution, 37: 1210-1226.
18. Lubchenco, J. and Real, L.A. 1991. Experimental manipulations in lab and in field systems: manipulative experiments as tests of ecological theory. In Foundations of Ecology (L.A. Real and J.H. Brown, eds.), pp. 715-733. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19. Mayr, E. and Provine, W.B. 1980. The Evolutionary Synthesis: Perspectives on the Unification of Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Morley, F.H.W. 1959. Natural selection and variation in plants. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol., 24: 47-56.
21. Nagy, E.S. 1997. Selection for native characters in hybrids between two locally adapted plant subspecies. Evolution, 51: 1469-1480.
22. Núñez-Farfán, J. 1993. Selección natural en el campo: revisión de la evidencia reciente. In Tópicos de biología evolutiva. Diversidad y Adaptación (J. Núñez-Farfán and C. Cordero, eds.), pp. 19-59. Mexico, DF: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
23. Núñez-Farfán, J. and Schlichting, C.D. 2001. Evolution in changing environments: the 'synthetic' work of Clausen, Keck and Hiesey. Quart. Rev. Biol., 76: 433-457.
24. Pigliucci, M. and Kaplan, J. 2000. The fall and rise of Dr Pangloss: adaptationism and the Spandrels paper 20 years later. Trends Ecol. Evol., 15: 66-70.
25. SAS. 1996. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
26. Scheiner, S.M., Mitchell, R.J. and Callahan, H.S. 2000. Using path analysis to measure natural selection. J. Evol. Biol., 13: 423-433.
27. Schlichting, C.D. and Pigliucci, M. 1998. Phenotypic Evolution: A Reaction Norm Perspective. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
28. Selzer, J. 1993. Understanding Scientific Prose. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
29. Weldon, W.F.R. 1898. Opening address. Nature, 58: 499-506.
30. Weldon, W.F.R. 1901-2. A first study of natural selection in Clausilla laminata (Montagu). Biometrika, 1: 109-115.