The food frequency questionnaire [1]

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 182-183

  Willett, Walter C ^a   Hu, Frank B ^a  

^a HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CARCINOGENESIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIETARY INTAKE; FOOD COMPOSITION; FOOD INTAKE; HUMAN; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; LETTER; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; NONHUMAN; NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK FACTOR;

DIET RECORDS; FOOD HABITS; HUMANS; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 33846615625     PISSN: 10559965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0843     Document Type: Letter

References (12)

1. Kristal AR, Potter JD. Not the time to abandon the food frequency questionnaire: a counterpoint. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:1977-83.
2. Willett WC. Nutritional epidemiology. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1998.
3. Willett WC, Hu FB. Not the time to abandon the food frequency questionnaire. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:1757-8.
4. Schatzkin A, Kipnis V, Carroll RJ, et al. A comparison of a food frequency questionnaire with a 24-hour recall for use in an epidemiological cohort study: results from the biomarker-based Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study. Int J Epidemiol 2003;32:1054-62.
5. Neuhouser M, Tinker L, Schoeller D, et al. Use of nutritional biomarkers to describe participant-related measurement error from dietary self-report in the Women's Health Initiative. In: Heitmann BL, Lissner L, Winkvist A, editors. Sixth International Conference on Dietary Assessment Methods: complementary advances in diet and physical activity assessment methodologies. Copenhagen (Denmark): Diet Research Foundation, The Danish Network of Nutritional Epidemiologists, Swedish Network for Nutritional Epidemiology; 2006. p. SY01 01.
6. Eliassen HA, Colditz GA, Rosner B, Willett WC, Hankinson SE. Adult weight change and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. JAMA 2006;296:193-201.
7. Bingham S, Luben R, Welch A, Wareham N, Khaw K-T, Day N. Are imprecise methods obscuring a relation between fat and breast cancer [letter]? Lancet 2003;362:212-4.
8. Freedman LS, Potischman N, Kipnis V, et al. A comparison of two dietary instruments for evaluating the fat-breast cancer relationship. Int J Epidemiol 2006;35:1011-21.
9. Beth M, Berger MR, Aksoy M, Schmahl D. Comparison between the effects of dietary fat level and of calorie intake on methylnitrosourea-induced mammary carcinogenesis in female SD rats. Int J Cancer 1987;39:737-44.
10. Tasevska N, Runswick SA, Bingham S. The development of new biomarkers of nutritional intake. In: Heitmann BL, Lissner L, Winkvist A, editors. Sixth International Conference on Dietary Assessment Methods: Complementary Advances in Diet and Physical Activity Assessment Methodologies. Copenhagen (Denmark): Diet Research Foundation, The Danish Network of Nutritional Epidemiologists, Swedish Network for Nutritional Epidemiology; 2006. p. SY00 06.
11. Willett WC, Howe GR, Kushi LH. Adjustment for total energy intake in epidemiologic studies. Am J Clin Nutr 1997;65:1220-8S.
12. Hunter DJ, Sampson L, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Rosner B, Willett WC. Variability in portion sizes of commonly consumed foods among a population of women in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 1988;127:1240-9.