A posteriori registration and subtraction of panoramic compared with intraoral radiography

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology

Volumn 108, Issue 2, 2009, Pages

  Deserno, Thomas M ^a   Rangarajan, Janaki Raman ^a   Hoffmann, Jens ^a   Brägger, Urs ^b   Mericske Stern, Regina ^b   Enkling, Norbert ^b  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; HISTOLOGY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; INSTRUMENTATION; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SWINE; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ANIMALS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DENTAL IMPLANTS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MANDIBLE; RADIOGRAPHY, BITEWING; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; SWINE;

EID: 67650132623     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.03.036     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Gröndahl H.G., Gröndahl K., and Webber R.L. A digital subtraction technique for dental radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 55 (1983) 96-102
2. Araki K., Kitamori H., Yoshiura K., Okuda H., and Ohki M. Standardized lateral oblique projection of the mandible for digital subtraction radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 21 (1992) 88-92
3. Matsopoulos G.K., Mouravliansky N.A., Asvestas P.A., Delibasis K.K., Grondahl K., and Grondahl H.G. Image registration based on lifting process: an application to digital subtraction radiography. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 10 (2006) 763-774
4. Yi W.J., Heo M.S., Lee S.S., Choi S.C., and Huh K.H. ROI-based image registration for digital subtraction radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 101 (2006) 523-529
5. Ricketts D.N., Ekstrand K.R., Martignon S., Ellwood R., Alatsaris M., and Nugent Z. Accuracy and reproducibility of conventional radiographic assessment and subtraction radiography in detecting demineralization in occlusal surfaces. Caries Res 41 (2007) 121-128
6. Bittar-Cortez J.A., Passeri L.A., Bóscolo F.N., and Haiter-Neto F. Comparison of hard tissue density changes around implants assessed in digitized conventional radiographs and subtraction images. Clin Oral Implants Res 17 (2006) 560-564
7. Wakoh M., Nishikawa K., Otonari T., Yamamoto M., Harada T., Sano T., et al. Digital subtraction technique for evaluation of peri-implant bone change in digital dental imaging. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 47 (2006) 57-64
8. Bae K.H., Han J.S., Seol Y.J., Butz F., Caton J., and Rhyu I.C. The biologic stability of alumina-zirconia implant abutments after 1 year of clinical service: a digital subtraction radiographic evaluation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 28 (2008) 137-143
9. Lioubavina N., Kostopoulos L., Wenzel A., and Karring T. Long-term stability of jaw bone tuberosities formed by "guided tissue regeneration.". Clin Oral Implants Res 10 (1999) 477-486
10. Ekberg E.C., Petersson A., and Nilner M. An evaluation of digital subtraction radiography for assessment of changes in position of the mandibular condyle. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 27 (1998) 230-235
11. Garg A.K., and Vicari A. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry. The Implant Society 5 (1995) 7-11
12. Masood F., Katz J.O., Hardman P.K., Glaros A.G., and Spencer P. Comparison of panoramic radiography and panoramic digital subtraction radiography in the detection of simulated osteophytic lesions of the mandibular condyle. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 93 (2002) 626-631
13. Ibanez L., Schroeder W., Ng L., and Cates J. ITK software guide-the Insight Segmentation and Registration Tool Kit. 2nd ed. (2005), Kitware, Clifton Park, NY
14. Lehmann T.M., Gröndahl H.G., and Benn D.K. Computer-based registration for digital subtraction in dental radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 29 (2000) 323-346
15. Lehmann T.M., Gönner C., and Spitzer K. Survey: interpolation methods in medical image processing. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18 (1999) 1049-1075
16. Mattes D., Haynor D.R., Vesselle H., Lewellen T.K., and Eubank W. PET-CT image registration in the chest using free-form deformations. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22 (2003) 120-128
17. Pluim J.P., Maintz J.B., and Viergever M.A. Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22 (2003) 986-1004
18. Wenzel A., and Sewerin I. Sources of noise in digital subtraction radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 71 (1991) 503-508
19. Lehmann T.M., Sovakar A., Schmitt W., and Repges R. A comparison of mathematical similarity measures for digital subtraction radiography. Comput Biol Med 27 (1997) 151-167
20. van der Stelt P.F. Better imaging: the advantages of digital radiography. J Am Dent Assoc 139 Suppl (2008) 7S-13S
21. Hawkes D.J. Algorithms for radiological image registration and their clinical application. J Anat 193 (1998) 347-361
22. Stellingsma K., Batenburg R.H., Meijer H.J., Raghoebar G.M., and Kropmans T.J. The oblique radiographic technique for bone height measurements on edentulous mandibles: a preclinical study and an introduction to the clinical use. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 89 (2000) 522-529
23. Kuroyanagi K. New approach to analysis of rotational panoramic radiography by computer simulation. Dent Jpn (Tokyo) 27 (1990) 115-118