A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of edentulous jaw
Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockier B, Branemark P-I. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416.
Survival of the Branemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: A 10-year prospective multicenter study
Lekholm U, Gunne J, Henry P, et al. Survival of the Branemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: A 10-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:639-645.
Ceramic implant abutment for short-span FPDs: A prospective 5-year multicenter study
Andersson B, Glauser R, Maglione M, Taylor A. Ceramic implant abutment for short-span FPDs: A prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:640-646.
Alumina ceramic implant abutment used for single-tooth replacement: A prospective 1-to 3-year multicenter study
Andersson B, Taylor A, Lang B, et al. Alumina ceramic implant abutment used for single-tooth replacement: A prospective 1-to 3-year multicenter study. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:432-438.
Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported singletooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study
Glauser R, Sailer I, Wohlwend A, Studer S, Schibli M, Sharer P. Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported singletooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:285-290.
Mechanical properties, phase stability, and biocompatibility of (Y,Nb)-TZP/Al2O3 composite abutments for dental implants
Kim DJ, Lee MH, Lee DY, Han JS. Mechanical properties, phase stability, and biocompatibility of (Y,Nb)-TZP/Al2O3 composite abutments for dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;53:438-443.
Crestal bone changes around titanium implants: A methodological study comparing linear radiographic with histomeric measurements
Hermann JS, Schoolfield JD, Nummikoski PV, Buser D, Schenk RK. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants: A methodological study comparing linear radiographic with histomeric measurements. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:475-485.
Sensitivity of various radiographic methods for detection of oral cancellous bone lesions
Parsell DE, Gatewood RS, Watts JD, Streckfus CF. Sensitivity of various radiographic methods for detection of oral cancellous bone lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1998;86:498-502.
An in-vitro evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system using bone chips on dry human mandibles
Rawlinson A, Ellwood RP, Davies RM. An in-vitro evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system using bone chips on dry human mandibles. J Clin Periodontol 1999;26:138-142.
Analysis of sensitivity and specificity of a new digital subtraction system: An in vitro study
Dove SB, McDavid WD, Hamilton KE. Analysis of sensitivity and specificity of a new digital subtraction system: An in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 2000;89:771-776.
Crestal bone changes around titanim implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible
Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, Cochran DL. Crestal bone changes around titanim implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 2000;71:1412-1424.
Evaluation of factors influencing the marginal bone stability around implants in the treatment of partial edentulism
Naert I, Duyck J, Hosny M, Jacobs R, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D. Evaluation of factors influencing the marginal bone stability around implants in the treatment of partial edentulism. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001;3(1):30-38.