Distinguishing automatic and controlled components of attitudes from direct and indirect measurement methods

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 386-396

  Ranganath, Kate A ^a   Smith, Colin Tucker ^a   Nosek, Brian A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Attitude measurement; Attitudes; Automatic processes; Implicit attitudes

Indexed keywords

EID: 38849159270     PISSN: 00221031     EISSN: 10960465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.12.008     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bar-Anan, Y., Vianello, & M., Nosek, B. A. (2006). The sorting paired features task. Unpublished manuscript.
2. Bargh J.A. The four horsemen of automaticity: awareness, efficiency, intention and control in social cognition. In: Wyer Jr. R., and Srull T. (Eds). Handbook of social cognition. 2nd ed. (1994), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 1-40
3. Bassili J.N., and Brown R.D. Implicit and explicit attitudes: research, challenges, and theory. In: Albarracin D., Johnson B., and Zanna M. (Eds). The handbook of attitudes (2005), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 543-574
4. Conrey F.R., Sherman J.W., Gawronski B., Hugenberg K., and Groom C.J. Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: the QUAD Model of implicit task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89 (2005) 469-487
5. Crandall C.S., and Eshleman A. A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin 129 (2003) 414-446
6. De Houwer J. What are implicit measures and why are we using them. In: Wiers R.W., and Stacy A.W. (Eds). The handbook of implicit cognition and addiction (2006), Sage Publishers, Thousand Oaks, CA 11-28
7. Dillon W.R., Kumar A., and Mulani N. Offending estimates in covariance structure analysis: comments on the causes of and solutions to Heywood Cases. Psychological Bulletin 101 (1987) 126-135
8. Fazio R.H. Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: the MODE model as an integrative framework. In: Zanna M. (Ed). Advances in experimental social psychology Vol. 23 (1990), Academic Press, New York 75-109
9. Fazio R.H., and Olson M.A. Implicit measures in social cognition: their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology 54 (2003) 297-327
10. Fazio R.H., Sanbonmatsu D.M., Powell M.C., and Kardes F.R. On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 (1986) 229-238
11. Greenwald A.G., and Banaji M.R. Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review 102 (1995) 4-27
12. Greenwald A.G., McGhee D.E., and Schwartz J.L.K. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 (1998) 1464-1480
13. Greenwald A.G., Nosek B.A., and Banaji M.R. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (2003) 197-216
14. MacCallum R.C., Browne M.W., and Sugawara H.M. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods 1 (1996) 130-149
15. McArdle J.J., Johnson R.C., Hishinuma E.S., Miyamoto R.H., and Andrade N.N. Structural equation modeling of group differences in CES-D ratings of native Hawaiian and non-Hawaiian high school students. Journal of Adolescent Research 16 (2001) 108-149
16. Nasser F., and Wisenbaker J. A Monte Carlo study investigating the impact of item Parceling on measures of fit in confirmatory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement 63 (2003) 729-757
17. Nosek B.A., and Banaji M.R. The go/no-go association task. Social Cognition 19 (2001) 625-666
18. Nosek B.A., Greenwald A.G., and Banaji M.R. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31 (2005) 166-180
19. Payne K.B. Prejudice and perception: the role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (2001) 181-192
20. Payne B.K., Jacoby L.L., and Lambert A.J. Attitudes as accessibility bias: dissociating automatic and controlled processes. In: Hassan R., Bargh J., and Uleman J. (Eds). The new unconscious (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England
21. Smith E.R., and DeCoster J. Associative and rule-based processing: a connectionist interpretation of dual-process models. In: Chaiken S., and Trope Y. (Eds). Dual-process theories in social psychology (1999), Guilford Press, New York 323-337
22. Steiger J.H. Point estimate, hypothesis testing, and interval estimation using the RMSEA: some comments and a reply to Hayduck and Glaser. Structural Equation Modeling 7 (2000) 149-162
23. Steiger, J. H., Lind, J. (1980). Statistically based tests for the number of factors. Paper presented at the annual spring meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
24. Strack F., and Deutsch R. Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review 8 (2004) 220-247
25. Wilson T.D., Lindsey S., and Schooler T.Y. A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review 107 (2000) 101-126