Collisions of DCl with a solution covered with hydrophobic and hydrophilic ions: Tetrahexylammonium bromide in glycerol

Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Volumn 113, Issue 26, 2009, Pages 7422-7430

  Brastad, Susan M ^a   Albert, Daniel R ^a   Huang, Mingwei ^a   Nathanson, Gilbert M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GAS LIQUIDS; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC; INTERFACIAL INTERACTION; IONIC SURFACTANTS; LIQUID SQUALANE; OH GROUP; SCATTERING MEASUREMENTS; TETRAHEXYLAMMONIUM BROMIDES;

ARGON; GLYCEROL; HYDROCARBONS; HYDROPHILICITY; HYDROPHOBICITY; IONIZATION OF LIQUIDS; LIQUIDS; MONOLAYERS; SCATTERING; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS; SURFACE TENSION;

IONS;

EID: 67649547054     PISSN: 10895639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp900232v     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Wen, W.-Y. Aqueous Solutions of Symmetrical Tetraalkylammonium Salts. In Water and Aqueous Solutions: Structure, Thermodynamics, and Transport Processes; Horne, R. A., Ed.; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1972;p 613.
2. Marcus, Y. J. Solution Chem. 2008, 37, 1071.
3. Slusher, J. T.; Cummings, P. T. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 3818.
4. Stangret, J.; Gampe, T. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 3778.
5. Tamaki, K. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1974, 47, 2764.
6. Andersson, G.; Morgner, H.; Schulze, K. D. Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 2002, 190, 222.
7. Andersson, G.; Krebs, T.; Morgner, H. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005, 7, 2948.
8. Ballard, R. E.; Jones, J.; Sutherland, E. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1984, 112, 310.
9. Holmberg, S.; Yuan, Z. C.; Moberg, R.; Siegbahn, H. J. Electron Spectrosc. 1988, 47, 27.
10. Eschen, F.; Heyerhoff, M.; Morgner, H.; Vogt, J. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 1995, 7, 1961.
11. Winter, B.; Weber, R.; Schmidt, P. M.; Hertel, I. V.; Faubel, M.; Vrbka, L.; Jungwirth, P. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 14558.
12. Winter, B.; Weber, R.; Hertel, I. V.; Faubel, M.; Vrbka, L.; Jungwirth, P. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2005, 410, 222.
13. Bergersen, H.; Marinho, R. R. T.; Pokapanich, W.; Lindblad, A.; Björneholm, O.; Saethre, L. J.; Öhrwall, G. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2007, 79, 326101.
14. Hrobárik, T.; Vrbka, L.; Jungwirth, P. Biophys. Chem. 2006, 124, 238.
15. Jungwirth, P.; Tobias, D. J. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 1259.
16. García-Tarrés, L.; Guàrdia, E. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 7448.
17. Vrbka, L.; Jungwirth, P. Aust. J. Chem. 2004, 57, 1211.
18. Andersson, G.; Morgner, H. Surf. Sci. 2000, 445, 89.
19. Newman, A. A. Glycerol; C. R. C. Press: Cleveland, 1968.
20. Ringeisen, B. R.; Muenter, A. H.; Nathanson, G. M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 4988.
21. Ringeisen, B. R.; Muenter, A. H.; Nathanson, G. M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 4999.
22. Chorny, I.; Benjamin, I.; Nathanson, G. M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 995.
23. Muenter, A. H.; DeZwaan, J. L.; Nathanson, G. M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 4881.
24. Muenter, A. H.; DeZwaan, J. L.; Nathanson, G. M. J. Phys. Chem C 2007, 111, 15043.
25. DeZwaan, J. L.; Brastad, S. M.; Nathanson, G. M. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 3008.
26. -4 molal in water). See ref 27.
27. Nakayama, H.; Kuwata, H.; Yamamoto, N.; Akagi, Y.; Matsui, H. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1989, 62, 985.
28. Defay, R.; Prigogine, I. Surface Tension and Adsorption; Wiley: New York, 1966; Chapter 2.
29. -2 when activity coefficients for TBABr in acetonitrile are used in eq 1. This solvent was chosen because its dielectric constant of 38 is similar to the value of 41 for glycerol. See Barthel, J.; Kunz, W. J. Solution Chem. 1988, 17, 399.
30. Andersson, G.; Krebs, T.; Morgner, H. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005, 7, 136.
31. Butler, J. A. V.; Wightman, A. J. Chem. Soc. 1932, 2089.
32. 2/3..
33. -2 using activity coefficients measured for NaI in glycerol (ref 23). Even this deficit is likely to be too high because activity coefficients for NaBr in water are smaller than for NaI (ref 59).
34. Lawrence, J. R.; Glass, S. V.; Nathanson, G. M. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 7449.
35. Glass, S. V.; Park, S.-C; Nathanson, G. M. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 7593.
36. Köhler, S. P. K.; Reed, S. K.; Westacott, R. E.; McKendrick, K. G. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 11717.
37. -1), which implies an average residence time shorter than the time for diffusion across a single glycerol layer. See eq 2 of ref 20.
38. soiv values in Figure 6 but assumed that they may also be used for the present DCl experiments.
39. See also Zolot, A. M.; Dagdigian, P. J.; Nesbitt, D. J. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 129, 194705, which reports longtime evaporation (>1 ms) of HF from squalane following collisions of F atoms. This signal is attributed to emission of hot HF molecules from the liquid that strike the chamber walls, thermalize, and return to the probe region. In our experiments, the analogous source of HCl would be the 6% HCl impurity in the impinging DCl beam. The HCl signal arising from this impurity is subtracted from each TOF spectrum in Figures 7 and 8 by recording the HCl TOF spectrum generated by an impinging HCl beam created in the same way as the DCl beam. This subtraction procedure automatically removes from the TOF spectra the signal from any HCl molecules that strike the chamber walls and return to the probe region.
40. -1, times the ratio of viscosities, (1 cP/35 cP).
41. The NaBr reaction probabilities measured in ref 24 are determined by scaling the HCl and DCl TOF signals from NaBr-glycerol to the values for pure glycerol recorded at the same time. The ratios are then multiplied by the average reaction probabilities for pure glycerol, as described in the Appendix of ref 24. The averages used in ref 24 were based on 11 measurements for pure glycerol. We have updated the reaction probabilities on the basis of a new average of 23 pure glycerol measurements. The updated values for pure glycerol and NaBr-glycerol reported in Figure 9 lie within 10% of the values reported in ref 24.
42. Wen, W.-Y. J. Solution Chem. 1973, 2, 253.
43. Turner, J.; Soper, A. K. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 101, 6116.
44. Heinz, H.; Suter, U. W. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 18341.
45. Raugei, S.; Klein, M. L. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 116, 196.
46. Faralli, C.; Pagliai, M.; Cardini, G.; Schettino, V. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 14923.
47. Ayala, R.; Martínez, J. M.; Pappalardo, R. R.; Saint-Martin, H.; Ortega-Blake, I.; Marcos, E. S. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 10512.
48. Carrillo-Tripp, M.; Saint-Martin, H.; Ortega-Blake, I. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 7062.
49. Ikeda, T.; Boero, M.; Terakura, K. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 034501.
50. Bakker, H. J. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 1456.
51. Zhuang, W.; Dellago, C. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 19647.
52. For the effect of ions on proton transport in aqueous solutions, see Hertz, H. G.; Versmold, H.; Yoon, C. Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 1983, 87, 577.
53. Diratsaoglu, J.; Hauber, S.; Hertz, H. G.; Müller, K. J. Z. Phys. Chem. 1990, 168, 13.
54. Choe, Y.-K.; Tsuchida, E.; Ikeshoji, T. J. Chem Phys. 2007, 126, 154510 .
55. Morrone, J. A.; Tuckerman, M. E. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 4403.
56. Buchner, R.; Hölzl, C.; Stauber, J.; Barthel, J. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2002, 4, 2169.
57. Kunz, W.; Turq, P.; Calmettes, P.; Barthel, J.; Klein, L. J. Phys. Chem. 1006, 96, 2743.
58. Kuba, A.; Hawlicka, E. J. Mol. Liq. 2004, 112, 91.
59. Heinje, G.; Luck, W. A. P.; Heinzinger, K. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 331.
60. Moberg, R.; Bokman, F.; Bohman, O.; Siegbahn, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 113, 3663.
61. Robinson, R. A.; Stokes, R. H. Electrolyte Solutions, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1959.
62. Harned, H. S.; Owen, B. B. The Physical Chemistry of Electrolyte Solutions; Reinhold: New York, 1958; Chapter 12.