Priming of Simple and Complex Scene Layout: Rapid Function From the Intermediate Level

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 735-749

  Sanocki, Thomas ^a   Sulman, Noah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

intermediate level processing; layout; priming; scene perception; spatial processing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; LEARNING; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; RECEPTIVE FIELD;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; HUMANS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 67549100942     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0013032     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Alvarez G., and Cavanagh P. The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. Psychological Science 15 (2004) 106-111
2. Biederman I. Perceiving real-world scenes. Science 177 (1972, 7 July) 77-80
3. Biederman I. On the semantics of a glance at a scene. In: Kubovy M., and Pomerantz J.R. (Eds). Perceptual organization (1981), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 213-253
4. Bowers J.S., and Marsolek C.J. Rethinking implicit memory (2003), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England
5. Chun M.M., and Jiang Y. Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology 36 (1998) 28-71
6. Cohen J.D., MacWhinney B., Flatt M., and Provost J. PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 25 (1993) 257-271
7. Cutting J.E., and Vishton P.M. Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In: Epstein W., and Rogers S. (Eds). Handbook of perception and cognition: Vol. 5. Perception of space and motion (1995), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 1-46
8. De Caro S., and Reeves A. Rotating objects to determine orientation, not identity: Evidence from a backward-masking/dual-task procedure. Perception & Psychophysics 62 (2000) 1356-1366
9. Domini F., Caudek C., and Tassinari H. Stereo and motion information are not independently processed by the visual system. Vision Research 46 (2006) 1707-1723
10. Enns J.T., and Rensink R.A. Preattentive recovery of three-dimensional orientation from line drawings. Psychological Review 98 (1991) 335-351
11. Evans K., and Treisman A. Perception of objects in natural scenes: Is it really attention free?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31 (2005) 1476-1492
12. Gibson J.J. The ecological approach to visual perception (1979), Houghton Mifflin, Boston
13. Henderson J.M., and Anes M.D. Roles of object-file preview and type priming in visual identification within and across eye fixations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (1994) 826-839
14. Henderson J.M., and Hollingworth A. Eye movements during scene viewing: An overview. In: Underwood G. (Ed). Eye guidance while reading and while watching dynamic scenes (1997), Elsevier, New York
15. Kahneman D., Treisman A., and Gibbs B.J. The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology 24 (1992) 175-219
16. Kirchner H., and Thorpe S. Ultra-rapid object detection with saccadic eye movements: Visual processing speed revisited. Vision Research 46 (2006) 1762-1776
17. Logan G.D. Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review 95 (1988) 492-527
18. Logan G.D. Linguistic and conceptual control of visual spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology 28 (1995) 103-174
19. Marr D. Vision (1982), Freeman, San Francisco
20. McClelland J.L. On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychological Review 86 (1979) 287-330
21. McConkie G.W., and Rayner K. Identifying the span of the effective stimulus in reading: Literature review and theories of reading. In: Singer H., and Ruddell R.B. (Eds). Theoretical models and processes of reading (1976), International Reading Association, Newark, NJ 137-162
22. Michod K.O., and Intraub H. Conceptual masking: Is it really all about the concept or does layout matter? [Abstract]. Journal of Vision 7 9 (2007) 191a
23. Miller J. Discrete and continuous models of human information processing: Theoretical distinctions and empirical results. Acta Psychologica 67 (1988) 191-257
24. Neisser U. Cognitive psychology (1967), Appleton-Century-Crofts, East Norwalk, CT
25. Ni R., Braunstein M., and Andersen G. Distance perception from motion parallax and ground contact. Visual Cognition 12 (2005) 1235-1254
26. Oliva A., and Schyns P. Coarse blobs or fine edges? Evidence that information diagnosticity changes the perception of complex visual stimuli. Cognitive Psychology 34 (1997) 72-107
27. Potter M. Meaning in visual search. Science 187 (1975, 3 March) 965-966
28. Potter M. Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 2 (1976) 509-522
29. Rensink R.A. The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition 7 (2000) 17-42
30. Rousselet G., Fabre-Thorpe M., and Thorpe S. Parallel processing in high-level categorization of natural images. Nature Neuroscience 5 (2002) 629-630
31. Rousselet G., Joubert O., and Fabre-Thorpe M. How long to get to the 'gist' of real-world natural scenes?. Visual Cognition 12 (2005) 852-877
32. Sanocki T. Representation and perception of scenic layout. Cognitive Psychology 47 (2003) 43-86
33. Sanocki T., and Epstein W. Priming spatial layout of scenes. Psychological Science 8 (1997) 374-378
34. Sanocki T.T., Michelet K., Sellers E., and Reynolds J. Functional representations of spatial layout can consist of independent pieces. Perception & Psychophysics 68 (2006) 415-427
35. Schneider W., and Shiffrin R.M. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review 84 (1977) 1-66
36. Schone, H. (1984). Spatial orientation (C. Strausfeld, Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work publisher 1980).
37. Schyns P., and Oliva A. From blobs to boundary edges: Evidence for time- and spatial-scale-dependent scene recognition. Psychological Science 5 (1994) 195-200
38. Sedgwick H.A. Space perception. In: Boff K.R., Kaufman L., and Thomas J.P. (Eds). Handbook of perception and human performance (1986), Wiley, New York 1-57
39. Sternberg S. The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, Amsterdam 30 (1969) 276-315
40. Sternberg S. Discovering mental processing stages: The method of additive factors. In: Scarborough D., and Sternberg S. (Eds). Methods, models, and conceptual issues: An invitation to cognitive science 4 (1998), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 703-863
41. Torralba A., Oliva A., Castelhano M., and Henderson J. Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psychological Review 113 (2006) 766-786
42. Treisman A., and Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 12 (1980) 97-136
43. Treisman A., and Gormican S. Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review 95 (1988) 15-48
44. Wolfe J., and Bennett S. Preattentive object files: Shapeless bundles of basic features. Vision Research 37 (1997) 25-43