Representations of scene layout can consist of independent, functional pieces

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 68, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 415-427

  Sanocki, Thomas ^a   Michelet, Kimberly ^a   Sellers, Eric ^a   Reynolds, Joseph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; VISION;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33748358323     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193686     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. ANDERSEN, G. J., HAHN, S., & SAIDPOUR, A. (2001). Static scene information and the perception of locomotion [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 1, 2a. Available at journalofvision.org/1/3/2, DOI 10.1167/1.3.2.
2. BIEDERMAN, I. (1981). On the semantics of a glance at a scene. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Perceptual organization (pp. 213-253). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. BIEDERMAN, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
4. BIEDERMAN, I., HILTON, H. J., & HUMMEL, J. E. (1991). Pattern goodness and pattern recognition. In G. R. Lockhead & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), The perception of structure: Essays in honor of Wendell R. Garner (pp. 73-95). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
5. BOYCE, S. J., POLLATSEK, A., & RAYNER, K. (1989). Effect of background information on object identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 556-566.
6. CHUN, M. M., & JIANG, Y. (1998). Contextual cuing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71.
7. DAVENPORT, J. L., & POTTER, M. C. (2004). Scene consistency in object and background perception. Psychological Science, 15, 559-564.
8. DI LOLLO, V. (1980). Temporal integration in visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 75-97.
9. ENNS, J. T., & RENSINK, R. A. (1991). Preattentive recovery of three-dimensional orientation from line drawings. Psychological Review, 98, 335-351.
10. GOTTESMAN, C. V. (2002, November). Mental extrapolations as primes for spatial layout processing. Presented at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Kansas City, MO.
11. GROSSBERG, S., & MINGOLLA, E. (1985). Neural dynamics of form perception: Boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading. Psychological Review, 92, 173-211.
12. HENDERSON, J. M., & HOLLINGWORTH, A. (1998). Eye movements during scene viewing: An overview. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 269-293). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
13. HOCHBERG, J. E. (1978). Perception (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14. HOCHBERG, J. [E.], & PETERSON, M. A. (1987). Piecemeal organization and cognitive components in object perception: Perceptually coupled responses to moving objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 370-380.
15. HUMMEL, J. E., & BIEDERMAN, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99, 480-517.
16. INTRAUB, H. (2002). Anticipatory spatial representation of natural scenes: Momentum without movement? Visual Cognition, 9, 93-119.
17. MARR, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.
18. MCCLELLAND, J. L., & RUMELHART, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
19. MILNER, A. D., & GOODALE, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. NORMAN, J. (2002). Two visual systems and two theories of perception: An attempt to reconcile the constructivist and ecological approaches. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 25, 73-96.
21. PALMER, S. E. (1999). Vision science: Photons to phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. PALMER, S. [E.], & ROCK, I. (1994). Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 29-55.
23. PENNEY, T. B., MECKLINCER, A., HILTON, H. J., & COOPER, L. A. (2000). Priming and recognition of novel 3D objects: Guidance from event-related potentials. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 1, 67-90.
24. RUECKL, J. G., MIKOLINSKI, M., RAVEH, M., MINER, C. S., & MARS, F. (1997). Morphological priming, fragment completion, and connectionist networks. Journal of Memory & Language, 36, 382-405.
25. SANOCKI, T. (2003). Representation and perception of scenic layout. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 43-86.
26. SANOCKI, T., & EPSTEIN, W. (1997). Priming spatial layout of scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 374-378.
27. SCHACTER, D. L., COOPER, L. A., DELANEV, S. M., & PETERSON, M. A. (1991). Implicit memory for possible and impossible objects: Constraints on the construction of structural descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 3-19.
28. SCHÖNE, H. (1984). Spatial orientation: The spatial control of behavior in animals and man (C. Strausfeld, Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29. SHEPARD, R. N. (1984). Ecological constraints on internal representation: Resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. Psychological Review, 91, 417-447.
30. TVERSKY, B., KIM, J., & COHEN, A. (1999). Mental models of spatial relations and transformations from language. In G. Rickheit & C. Habel (Eds.), Mental models in discourse processing and reasoning (pp. 239-258). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
31. VISHTON, P. M., & CUTTING, J. E. (1995). Wayfinding, displacements, and mental maps: Velocity fields are not typically used to determine one's aimpoint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 978-995.
32. WERTHEIMER, M. (1950). Gestalt theory. In W. D. Ellis (Ed.), A sourcebook of Gestalt psychology (pp. 1-11). New York: Humanities Press. (Original work published 1924)
33. WITKIN, A. P., & TENENBAUM, J. M. (1983). On the role of structure in vision. In J. Beck, B. Hope, & A. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Human and machine vision (pp. 481-543). New York: Academic Press.