Priming spatial layout of scenes

Psychological Science

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 374-378

  Sanocki, Thomas ^b   Epstein, William ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347683741     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00428.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Biederman, I., & Cooper, E.E. (1991). Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 393-419.
2. Clark, H.H., Carpenter, P.A., & Just, M.A. (1973). On the meeting of semantics and perception. In W.G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 311-381). New York: Academic Press.
3. Epstein, W. (1995). The metatheoretic context. In W. Epstein & S. Rogers (Eds.), Perception of space and motion (pp. 1-22). San Diego: Academic Press.
4. Epstein, W., & Rogers, S. (Eds.). (1995). Perception of space and motion. San Diego: Academic Press.
5. Gibson, J.J. (1966). The senses considered as sensory systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
6. Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
7. Haber, R.N. (1983). Stimulus information and processing mechanisms in visual space perception. In J. Beck, B. Hope, & A. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Human and machine vision (pp. 157-235). New York: Academic Press.
8. Hochberg, J.E. (1978). Perception (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
9. Humphreys, G.W., & Quinlan, P.T. (1988). Priming effects between two-dimensional shapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance , 14, 203-220.
10. Ling, X., & Sanocki, T. (1995). Major axes as a moderately abstract model for object recognition. Psychological Science, 6, 370-375.
11. Logan, G. (1995). Linguistic and conceptual control of visual spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 28, 103-174.
12. Neisser, C. (1976). Cognition and reality. San Francisco: Freeman.
13. Neisser, U. (1994). Multiple systems: A new approach to cognitive theory. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6, 225-241.
14. Reinitz, M.T., Wright, E., & Loftus, G.R. (1989). Effects of semantic priming on visual encoding of pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 280-297.
15. Sanocki, T. (1991). Effects of early common features on form recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 490-497.
16. Sanocki, T. (1993). Time course of object recognition: Evidence for a global-to-local contingency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 878-898.
17. Sanocki, T. (1997). Structural contingencies and shifts of object-based attention during object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 780-807.
18. Srinivas, K. (1995). Representation of rotated objects in explicit and implicit memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 1019-1036.
19. Treisman, A., & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15-48.