The efficient use of enterprise information for strategic advantage: A data envelopment analysis

Journal of Operations Management

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 310-323

  Bendoly, Elliot ^a   Rosenzweig, Eve D ^a   Stratman, Jeff K ^b  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

Data envelopment analysis; Enterprise systems; Operations strategy

Indexed keywords

COMPETITIVE SUCCESS; COMPUSTAT; ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING SYSTEMS; ENTERPRISE SYSTEM; ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS; FINANCIAL IMPACTS; INFORMATION ACCESS; INFORMATION EFFICIENCY; OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE; OPERATIONS STRATEGY; STRATEGIC ADVANTAGES;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

INFORMATION USE;

EID: 67349241389     PISSN: 02726963     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2008.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Ahire S., Goldhar D., and Waller M. Development and validation of TQM implementation constructs. Decision Sciences 27 1 (1996) 23-56
2. Bancroft N.H., Seip H., and Sprengel A. Implementing SAP R/3. 2nd ed. (1998), Manning Publications Co., Greenwich, MA
3. Bendoly E. Theory and support for process frameworks of knowledge discovery & data mining from ERP systems. Information & Management 40 7 (2003) 639-647
4. Bendoly E., and Cotteleer M. Understanding behavioral sources of process variation following enterprise system deployment. Journal of Operations Management 26 1 (2008) 23-44
5. Bendoly E., and Jacobs R. Strategic ERP Extension and Use (2005), Stanford University Press, Santa Clara
6. Bendoly E., and Swink M. Moderating effects of information access on project management behavior, performance, and perceptions. Journal of Operations Management 25 3 (2007) 604-622
7. Bendoly E., Rosenzweig E.D., and Stratman J.K. Performance metric portfolios: a framework and empirical test. Production and Operations Management 16 2 (2007) 257-276
8. Bharadwaj A.S. A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly 24 1 (2000) 169-196
9. Boudreau M.C., and Robey D. Enacting integrated information technology: a human agency perspective. Organization Science 16 1 (2005) 3-18
10. Bresnahan T.F., Brynjolfsson E., and Hitt L.M. Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: firm level evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 1 (2002) 339-377
11. Brown, J., 2005. New Product Development: Profiting from Innovation. Aberdeen Group Business Value Research Series, December, 1-15.
12. Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L.M., and Yang S. Intangible assets: computers and organizational capital. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1 (2002) 137-182
13. Carr N.G. IT doesn't matter. Harvard Business Review May (2003) 5-12
14. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., and Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2 6 (1978) 429-444
15. Chen Y., Liang L., Yang F., and Zhu J. Evaluation of information technology investment: a data envelopment analysis approach. Computers and Operations Research 33 5 (2006) 1368-1384
16. Chen Y., and Zhu J. Measuring information technology's indirect impact on firm performance. Information Technology and Management 5 1 (2004) 9-22
17. Churchill G. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research 16 1 (1979) 64-73
18. Clark K. Competing through manufacturing and the new manufacturing paradigm: is manufacturing strategy passé?. Production and Operations Management 5 1 (1996) 42-58
19. Cool K.O., and Schendel D. Strategic group formation and performance: the case of the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. Management Science 33 9 (1987) 1102-1124
20. Cotteleer M.J., and Bendoly E. Order lead-time improvement following enterprise information technology implementation: an empirical study. MIS Quarterly 30 3 (2006) 643-660
21. Davenport, T., 2008. Back to decision-making basics. http://discussionleader.hbsp.com/davenport, March 4.
22. Devaraj S., and Kohli R. Performance impacts of information technology: is actual usage the missing link?. Management Science 49 3 (2000) 273-289
23. Epstein M.J., and Westbrook R.A. Linking actions to profit in strategic decision making. Sloan Management Review 42 3 (2001) 39-49
24. Fornell C., and Larcker D. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 1 (1981) 39-50
25. Gaimon C. Planning information technology-knowledge worker systems. Management Science 43 9 (1997) 1308-1328
26. Hayes R., and Pisano G. Manufacturing strategy: at the intersection of two paradigm shifts. Production and Operations Management 5 1 (1996) 25-41
27. Hendricks K.B., Singhal V.R., and Stratman J.K. The impact of enterprise systems on corporate performance: a study of ERP, SCM and CRM system implementations. Journal of Operations Management 25 1 (2007) 65-82
28. Hoover K.D. Causality in Macroeconomics (2001), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
29. Kaplan R.S., and Norton D.P. Having trouble with your strategy? Then map it. Harvard Business Review 78 5 (2000) 167-176
30. Katz, H., 2002. How to embrace CRM and make it succeed in an organization. SYSPRO White Paper. SYSPRO, Costa Mesa, CA.
31. Kohli R., and Devaraj S. Measuring information technology payoff: a meta-analysis of structural variables in firm-level empirical research. Information Systems Research 14 2 (2003) 127-145
32. Lapre M., and Scudder G. Performance improvement paths in the U.S. airline industry: linking trade-offs to asset frontier. Production and Operations Management 13 2 (2004) 123-134
33. McAfee A. The impact of enterprise information technology adoption on operational performance: an empirical investigation. Production and Operations Management 11 1 (2002) 33-53
34. Menor, L., Roth, A.V., 2003. What is a good measurement scale? Tutorial on new item and scale development in OM research. Ivey Business School, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, Working paper.
35. MetaGroup. The State of ERP Services (2004), META Group, Inc., Stamford, CT
36. Metters R., Frei F., and Vargas V. Measurement of multiple sites in service firms with data envelopment analysis. Production and Operations Management 8 3 (1999) 264-281
37. Miller J.G., and Roth A.V. A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies. Management Science 40 3 (1994) 285-304
38. Moore G.C., and Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research 2 2 (1991) 192-222
39. Narasimhan R., Talluri S., Sarkis J., and Ross A. Efficient service location design in government services: a decision support system framework. Journal of Operations Management 23 2 (2005) 163-178
40. Podsakoff P.M., and Organ D.W. Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. Journal of Management 12 (1986) 531-544
41. Porter M.E. Competitive Advantage (1985), The Free Press, New York
42. Powell T.C., and Dent-Micallef A. Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human, business and technology resources. Strategic Management Journal 18 5 (1997) 375-405
43. Rosenzweig, E.D., Easton, G.S., 2008. Tradeoffs in manufacturing? A meta-analysis and critique of the literature. Goizueta Business School, Emory University, Working paper.
44. Rosenzweig E.D., and Roth A.V. B2B seller competence: construct development and measurement using a supply chain strategy lens. Journal of Operations Management 25 6 (2007) 1311-1331
45. Roth A.V., and Miller J.G. Success factors in manufacturing. Business Horizons 35 4 (1992) 73-81
46. Sambamurthy V., Bharadwaj A., and Grover V. Shaping agility through digital options: reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly 27 2 (2003) 237-263
47. Schmenner R.W., and Swink M.L. On theory in operations management. Journal of Operations Management 17 (1998) 97-113
48. Shafer S.M., and Byrd T.A. A framework for measuring the efficiency of organizational investments in information technology using data envelopment analysis. OMEGA 28 2 (2000) 125-151
49. Shao B.B.M., and Lin W.T. Technical efficiency analysis of information technology investments: a 2-stage empirical investigation. Information & Management 39 5 (2002) 391-412
50. Sharma S., Mukherjee S., Kumar A., and Dillon W.R. A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models. Journal of Business Research 58 (2005) 935-943
51. Slater S.F., Olsen E.M., and Reddy V.K. Strategy-based performance measurement. Business Horizons July-August (1997) 37-44
52. Soteriou A.C., and Zenios S.A. Data envelopment analysis: an introduction and an application to bank branch performance assessment. In: Marcoulides G.A. (Ed). Modern Methods for Business Research (1998), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
53. Stratman J.K. Realizing benefits from enterprise resource planning: does strategic focus matter?. Production and Operations Management 16 2 (2007) 203-216
54. Stratman J.K., and Roth A.V. Enterprise resource planning (ERP) competence constructs: two-stage multi-item scale development and validation. Decision Sciences 33 4 (2002) 601-628
55. Suresh, H., 2004. What is customer relationship management (CRM)? Supply Chain Planet, April, 2004.
56. Swink M.L., Talluri S., and Pandejpong T. Faster, better, cheaper: a study of NPD project efficiency and performance tradeoffs. Journal of Operations Management 24 (2006) 542-562
57. Treacy M., and Wiersema F. Customer intimacy and other value disciplines. Harvard Business Review 71 1 (1993) 84-93
58. Vastag G. The theory of performance frontiers. Journal of Operations Management 18 (2000) 353-360
59. Verma D., and Sinha K.K. Toward a theory of project interdependencies in high tech R&D environments. Journal of Operations Management 20 5 (2002) 451-468