The effect of CyberDome, a novel 3-dimensional dome-shaped display system, on laparoscopic procedures

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 125-132

  Ohuchida, Kenoki ^a,b   Kenmotsu, Hajime ^a   Yamamoto, Atsuyuki ^c   Sawada, Kazuya ^c   Hayami, Takehito ^b   Morooka, Kenichi ^b   Hoshino, Hiroshi ^c   Uemura, Munenori ^a   Konishi, Kozo ^a   Yoshida, Daisuke ^d   Maeda, Takashi ^a   Ieiri, Satoshi ^d   Tanoue, Kazuo ^d   Tanaka, Masao ^b   Hashizume, Makoto ^a,d  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c PANASONIC CORPORATION   (Japan)

^d KYUSHU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

CyberDome; Depth perception; Laparoscopic surgery; Safety; Suturing and knot tying; Three dimensional display

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISPLAY SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE DISPLAY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MALE; MEDICAL ERROR; NORMAL HUMAN; OPERATION DURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGEON; SUTURING METHOD; TASK PERFORMANCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VOLUNTEER;

EID: 67349186331     PISSN: 18616410     EISSN: 18616429     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-009-0282-5     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Becker H, Melzer A, Schurr MO, Buess G (1993) 3-D video techniques in endoscopic surgery. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 1: 40-46
2. Chan AC, Chung SC, Yim AP, Lau JY, Ng EK, Li AK (1997) Comparison of two-dimensional vs three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 11: 438-440. doi: 10.1007/s004649900385
3. Dion YM, Gaillard F (1997) Visual integration of data and basic motor skills under laparoscopy. Influence of 2(D and 3-D video-camera systems. Surg Endosc 11): 995-1000. doi: 10.1007/s004649900510
4. van Bergen P, Kunert W, Bessell J, Buess GF (1998) Comparative study of two-dimensional and three-dimensional vision systems for minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc 12: 948-954. doi: 10.1007/s004649900754
5. Hanna GB, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A (1998) Randomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet 351: 248-251. doi: 10.1016/ S0140-6736(97)08005-7
6. Wenzl R, Lehner R, Vry U, Pateisky N, Sevelda P, Husslein P (1994) Three-dimensional video-endoscopy: Clinical use in gynaecological laparoscopy. Lancet 344: 1621-1622. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)90412-X
7. Taffinder N, Smith SG, Huber J, Russell RC, Darzi A (1999) The effect of a second-generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons. Surg Endosc 13: 1087-1092. doi: 10.1007/s004649901179
8. Yamauchi Y, Shinohara K (2005) Effect of binocular stereopsis on surgical manipulation performance and fatigue when using a stereoscopic endoscope. Stud Health Technol Inform 111: 611-614
9. Birkett DH (1994) Three-dimensional laparoscopy in gastrointestinal surgery. Int Surg 79: 357-360
10. Tanoue K, Ieiri S, Konishi K et al (2008) Effectiveness of endoscopic surgery training for medical students using a virtual reality simulator versus a box trainer: A randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 22(4): 985-990
11. Cuschieri A, Szabo Z (1995) Chapter 4; Intracorporeal knots in endoscopic surgery. In: Cuschieri A, Szabo Z (eds) Tissue approximation in endoscopic surgery. ISIS Medical Media, Oxford, pp 42-67
12. Falk V, Mintz D, Grunenfelder J, Fann JI, Burdon TA (2001) Influence of three-dimensional vision on surgical telemanipulator performance. Surg Endosc 15: 1282-1288. doi: 10.1007/s004640080053
13. Badani KK, Bhandari A, Tewari A, Menon M (2005) Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional suturing: Is there a difference in a robotic surgery setting. J Endourol 19: 1212-1215. doi: 10.1089/ end.2005.19.1212
14. Blavier A, Gaudissart Q, Cadiere GB, Nyssen AS (2007) Comparison of learning curves and skill transfer between classical and robotic laparoscopy according to the viewing conditions: Implications for training. Am J Surg 194: 115-121. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.10.014
15. Byrn JC, Schluender S, Divino CM et al (2007) Three-dimensional imaging improves surgical performance for both novice and experienced operators using the da Vinci Robot System. Am J Surg 193: 519-522. doi: 10.1016/ j.amjsurg.2006.06.042
16. Thomsen MN, Lang RD (2004) An experimental comparison of 3-dimensional and 2-dimensional endoscopic systems in a model. Arthroscopy 20: 419-423. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.01.003
17. van Bergen P, Kunert W, Buess GF (2000) The effect of high- definition imaging on surgical task efficiency in minimally invasive surgery: An experimental comparison between three-dimensional imaging and direct vision through a stereoscopic TEM rectoscope. Surg Endosc 14: 71-74. doi: 10.1007/s004649900015
18. Crosthwaite G, Chung T, Dunkley P, Shimi S, Cuschieri A (1995) Comparison of direct vision and electronic two- and three- dimensional display systems on surgical task efficiency in endoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 82: 849-851. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800820640
19. Pietrzak P, Arya M, Joseph JV, Patel HR (2006) Three-dimensional visualization in laparoscopic surgery. BJU Int 98: 253-256. doi: 10.1111/ j.1464-410X.2006.06287.x
20. Sun CC, Chiu AW, Chen KK, Chang LS (2000) Assessment of a three-dimensional operating system with skill tests in a pelvic trainer. Urol Int 64: 154-158. doi: 10.1159/000030517
21. Way LW, Stewart L, Gantert W et al (2003) Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: Analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective. Ann Surg 237: 460-469. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200304000-00004
22. Hofmeister J, Frank TG, Cuschieri A, Wade NJ (2001) Perceptual aspects of two-dimensional and stereoscopic display techniques in endoscopic surgery: Review and current problems. Semin Laparosc Surg 8: 12-24. doi: 10.1053/slas.2001.20835