Three-dimensional visualization in laparoscopic surgery

BJU International

Volumn 98, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 253-256

  Pietrzak, Peter ^a   Arya, Manit ^a   Joseph, Jean V ^b   Patel, Hiten R H ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEPTH PERCEPTION; ENDOSCOPE; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGING SYSTEM; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LEARNING; MONITOR; NOTE; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TECHNOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VIDEORECORDING;

EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LAPAROSCOPY; PHOTOGRAPHY; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 33745698545     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06287.x     Document Type: Note

References (15)

1. Zobel J. Basics of three-dimensional endoscopic vision. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 1993; 1: 36-9
2. Wade NJ, Swanston M. An Introduction to Visual Perception. London: Routlage, 1991
3. Hofmeister J, Frank TG, Cuschieri A, Wade NJ. Perceptual aspects of two-dimensional and stereoscopic display techniques in endoscopic surgery: review and current problems. Semin Laparosc Surg 2001; 8: 12-24
4. Mueller-Richter UD, Limberger A, Weber P, Ruprecht KW, Spitzer W, Schilling M. Possibilities and limitations of current stereo-endoscopy. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 942-7
5. Herron DM, Lantis JC 2nd, Maykel J, Basu C, Schwaitzberg SD. The 3-D monitor and head-mounted display. A quantitative evaluation of advanced laparoscopic viewing technologies. Surg Endosc 1999; 13: 751-5
6. Geis WP. Head-mounted video monitor for global visual access in mini-invasive surgery. An initial report. Surg Endosc 1996; 10: 768-70
7. Tevaearai HT, Mueller XM, von Segesser LK. 3-D vision improves performance in a pelvic trainer. Endoscopy 2000; 32: 464-8
8. Taffinder N, Smith SG, Huber J, Russell RC, Darzi A. The effect of a second-generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons. Surg Endosc 1999; 13: 1087-92
9. Wentink M, Jakimowicz JJ, Vos LM, Meijer DW, Wieringa PA. Quantitative evaluation of three advanced laparoscopic viewing technologies: a stereo endoscope, an image projection display, and a TFT display. Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 1237-41
10. van Bergen P, Kunert W, Buess GF. The effect of high-definition imaging on surgical task efficiency in minimally invasive surgery: an experimental comparison between three-dimensional imaging and direct vision through a stereoscopic TEM rectoscope. Surg Endosc 2000; 14: 71-4
11. van Bergen P, Kunert W, Bessell J, Buess GF. Comparative study of two-dimensional and three-dimensional vision systems for minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc 1998; 12: 948-54
12. Mueller-Richter UD, Limberger A, Weber P, Spitzer W, Schilling M. Comparison between three-dimensional presentation of endoscopic procedures with polarization glasses and an autostereoscopic display. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 502-4
13. Holden J, Frank TG, Cuschieri A. Developing technology for supended imaging for minimal access surgery. Semin Laparosc Surg 1997; 4: 74-9
14. Viirre E, Pryor H, Nagata S, Furness TA 3rd. The virtual retinal display: a new technology for virtual reality and augmented vision in medicine. Stud Health Technol Inform 1998; 50: 252-7
15. Schowengerdt BT, Seibel EJ. True three-dimensional displays that allow viewers to dynamically shift accommodation, bringing objects displayed at different viewing distances into and out of focus. Cyberpsychol Behav 2004; 7: 610-20