Effect of binocular stereopsis on surgical manipulation performance and fatigue when using a stereoscopic endoscope

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 111, Issue , 2005, Pages 611-614

  Yamauchi, Yasushi ^a   Shinohara, Kazuhiko ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

^b TOKYO UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENDOSCOPY; FATIGUE OF MATERIALS; STEREO IMAGE PROCESSING; SURVEYS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

BINOCULAR STEREOPSIS; DISPLAY CONDITIONS; LEARNING EFFECTS; MONOSCOPIC; STEREOSCOPIC ENDOSCOPE; SURGICAL MANIPULATION; VISUAL CONDITION;

THREE DIMENSIONAL DISPLAYS;

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; ENDOSCOPE; FATIGUE; HUMAN; JAPAN; METHODOLOGY; SURGERY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

DEPTH PERCEPTION; ENDOSCOPES; FATIGUE; HUMANS; JAPAN; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 23844497484     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. Taffinder N, Smith SG, Huber J, Russell RC, Darzi A: The Effect of a Second-generation 3D Endoscope on the Laparoscopic Precision of Novices and Experienced Surgeons. Surgical Endoscopy 13:1087-1092, 1999.
2. Hanna GB, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A: Randomized Study of Influence of Two-dimensional versus Three-dimensional Imaging on Performance of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Lancet 351:248-251, 1998.
3. Yamauchi Y, Shinohara K: Study on Evaluation Indexes of Surgical Manipulations with a Stereoscopic Endoscope. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3217:1083-1084, 2004.
4. Derossis AM, Fried GM, Abrahamowicz M, Sigman HH, Barkun JS, Meakins JL: Development of a Model for Training and Evaluation of Laparoscopic Skills. The American Journal of Surgery 175:482-487, 1998.
5. The Industrial Fatigue Research Committee of Japan Society for Occupational Health: Subjective Symptom Test of Fatigue- New Version. Digest of Science of Labour 57:295-314, 2002.