Adaptation of motor behavior to preserve task success in the presence of muscle fatigue

Neuroscience

Volumn 161, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 773-786

  Missenard, O ^a   Mottet, D ^a   Perrey, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONTPELLIER   (France)

Author keywords

fatigue; Fitts's law; humans; motor control; optimality; signal dependent noise

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE FATIGUE; MUSCLE FORCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; TASK PERFORMANCE; VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELBOW; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE FATIGUE; MUSCLE RELAXATION; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67349116544     PISSN: 03064522     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.03.062     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Bays P.M., and Wolpert D.M. Computational principles of sensorimotor control that minimize uncertainty and variability. J Physiol 578 (2007) 387-396
2. Ben-Itzhak S., and Karniel A. Minimum acceleration criterion with constraints implies bang-bang control as an underlying principle for optimal trajectories of arm reaching movements. Neural Comput 20 (2008) 779-812
3. Bigland-Ritchie B. EMG/force relations and fatigue of human voluntary contractions. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 9 (1981) 75-117
4. Christou E.A., Grossman M., and Cariton L.G. Modeling variability of force during isometric contractions of the quadriceps femoris. J Mot Behav 34 (2002) 67-81
5. Corcos D.M., Gottlieb G.L., and Agarwal G.C. Accuracy constraints upon rapid elbow movements. J Mot Behav 20 (1988) 255-272
6. Corcos D.M., Jiang H.Y., Wilding J., and Gottlieb G.L. Fatigue induced changes in phasic muscle activation patterns for fast elbow flexion movements. Exp Brain Res 142 (2002) 1-12
7. Dartnall T.J., Nordstrom M.A., and Semmler J.G. Motor unit synchronization is increased in biceps brachii after exercise-induced damage to elbow flexor muscles. J Neurophysiol 99 (2008) 1008-1019
8. Desmurget M., and Grafton S. Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cogn Sci 4 (2000) 423-431
9. Edman K.A., and Mattiazzi A.R. Effects of fatigue and altered pH on isometric force and velocity of shortening at zero load in frog muscle fibres. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 2 (1981) 321-334
10. Edwards R.G., and Lippold O.C. The relation between force and integrated electrical activity in fatigued muscle. J Physiol 132 (1956) 677-681
11. Elliott D., Helsen W.F., and Chua R. A century later: Woodworth's (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming. Psychol Bull 127 (2001) 342-357
12. Enoka R.M., and Duchateau J. Muscle fatigue: what, why and how it influences muscle function. J Physiol 586 (2008) 11-23
13. Farina D., Merletti R., and Enoka R.M. The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG. J Appl Physiol 96 (2004) 1486-1495
14. Fitts P.M. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol 47 (1954) 381-391
15. Fitts P.M., and Peterson J.R. Information capacity of discrete motor responses. J Exp Psychol 67 (1964) 103-112
16. Flash T., and Hogan N. The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J Neurosci 5 (1985) 1688
17. Furness P., Jessop J., and Lippold O.C. Long-lasting increases in the tremor of human hand muscles following brief, strong effort. J Physiol 265 (1977) 821-831
18. Guigon E., Baraduc P., and Desmurget M. Computational motor control: feedback and accuracy. Eur J Neurosci 27 (2008) 1003-1016
19. Harris C.M., and Wolpert D.M. Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 394 (1998) 780-784
20. Hermens H.J., Freriks B., Disselhorst-Klug C., and Rau G. Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 10 (2000) 361-374
21. Hogan N. An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements. J Neurosci 4 (1984) 2745-2754
22. Iguchi N., Sakaguchi Y., and Ishida F. The minimum endpoint variance trajectory depends on the profile of the signal-dependent noise. Biol Cybern 92 (2005) 219-228
23. Jones D.A., de Ruiter C.J., and de Haan A. Change in contractile properties of human muscle in relationship to the loss of power and slowing of relaxation seen with fatigue. J Physiol 576 (2006) 913-922
24. Jones K.E., Hamilton A.F., and Wolpert D.M. Sources of signal-dependent noise during isometric force production. J Neurophysiol 88 (2002) 1533-1544
25. Karniel A., and Inbar G.F. The use of a nonlinear muscle model in explaining the relationship between duration, amplitude, and peak velocity of human rapid movements. J Mot Behav 31 (1999) 203-206
26. Keenan K.G., Farina D., Maluf K.S., Merletti R., and Enoka R.M. Influence of amplitude cancellation on the simulated surface electromyogram. J Appl Physiol 98 (2005) 120-131
27. Kirsch R.F., and Rymer W.Z. Neural compensation for fatigue-induced changes in muscle stiffness during perturbations of elbow angle in human. J Neurophysiol 68 (1992) 449-470
28. Lavender A.P., and Nosaka K. Changes in fluctuation of isometric force following eccentric and concentric exercise of the elbow flexors. Eur J Appl Physiol 96 (2006) 235-240
29. Liu D., and Todorov E. Evidence for the flexible sensorimotor strategies predicted by optimal feedback control. J Neurosci 27 (2007) 9354-9368
30. Meyer D.E., Abrams R.A., Kornblum S., Wright C.E., and Smith J.E. Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychol Rev 95 (1988) 340-370
31. Missenard O., Mottet D., and Perrey S. Muscular fatigue increases signal-dependent noise during isometric force production. Neurosci Lett 437 (2008) 154-157
32. Missenard O., Mottet D., and Perrey S. The role of cocontraction in the impairment of movement accuracy with fatigue. Exp Brain Res 185 (2008) 151-156
33. Moore S.P., and Marteniuk R.G. Kinematic and electromyographic changes that occur as a function of learning a time-constrained aiming task. J Mot Behav 18 (1986) 397-426
34. Mottet D., and Bootsma R.J. The dynamics of goal-directed rhythmical aiming. Biol Cybern 80 (1999) 235-245
35. Mottet D., and Bootsma R.J. The dynamics of rhythmical aiming in 2D task space: relation between geometry and kinematics under examination. Hum Mov Sci 20 (2001) 213-241
36. Schmidt R.A., Zelaznik H., Hawkins B., Frank J.S., and Quinn Jr. J.T. Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychol Rev 47 (1979) 415-451
37. Semmler J.G., Tucker K.J., Allen T.J., and Proske U. Eccentric exercise increases EMG amplitude and force fluctuations during submaximal contractions of elbow flexor muscles. J Appl Physiol 103 (2007) 979-989
38. Slifkin A.B., and Newell K.M. Noise, information transmission, and force variability. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25 (1999) 837-851
39. Tanaka H., Krakauer J.W., and Qian N. An optimization principle for determining movement duration. J Neurophysiol 95 (2006) 3875-3886
40. Todorov E. Optimality principles in sensorimotor control. Nat Neurosci 7 (2004) 907-915
41. Todorov E., and Jordan M.I. Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci 5 (2002) 1226-1235
42. Uno Y., Kawato M., and Suzuki R. Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement: minimum torque-change model. Biol Cybern 61 (1989) 89-101
43. van der Helm F.C.T., and Rozendaal L.A. Musculoskeletal systems with intrinsic and proprioceptive feedback. In: Winters J.M., and Crago P.E. (Eds). Biomechanics and neural control of posture and movement (2000), Springer-Verlag, New York 164-174
44. Vollestad N.K. Measurement of human muscle fatigue. J Neurosci Methods 74 (1997) 219-227
45. Winters J.M., and Stark L. Analysis of fundamental human movement patterns through the use of in-depth antagonistic muscle models. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 32 (1985) 826-839
46. Woodworth R.S. The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychol Rev 3 (1899) 1-106
47. Yao W., Fuglevand R.J., and Enoka R.M. Motor-unit synchronization increases EMG amplitude and decreases force steadiness of simulated contractions. J Neurophysiol 83 (2000) 441-452
48. Zhou P., and Rymer W.Z. Factors governing the form of the relation between muscle force and the EMG: a simulation study. J Neurophysiol 92 (2004) 2878-2886