The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG

Journal of Applied Physiology

Volumn 96, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 1486-1495

  Farina, Dario ^a   Merletti, Roberto ^a   Enoka, Roger M ^b  

^a POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Amplitude cancellation; Electromyogram; Motor unit; Recruitment strategies; Spectral analysis; Synchronization

Indexed keywords

ELECTROMYOGRAM; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR UNIT; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; NERVE CONDUCTION; NEUROMUSCULAR SYSTEM; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFLEX RECRUITMENT; REVIEW; SPECTROSCOPY; SURFACE ELECTROMYOGRAM;

ANIMALS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; HUMANS; MOVEMENT; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; NERVOUS SYSTEM PHYSIOLOGY; NEUROMUSCULAR JUNCTION; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY;

EID: 1642337026     PISSN: 87507587     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01070.2003     Document Type: Review

References (87)

1. Aagaard P, Simonsen EB, Andersen JL, Magnusson SP, Bojsen-Møller F, and Dyhre-Poulsen P. Antagonist muscle coactivation during isokinetic knee extension. Scand J Med Sci Sports 10: 58-67, 2000.
2. Andreassen S and Arendt-Nielsen L. Muscle fibre conduction velocity in motor units of the human anterior tibial muscle: a new size principle parameter. J Physiol 391: 561-571, 1987.
3. Arendt-Nielsen L, Mills KR, and Forster A. Changes in muscle fiber conduction velocity, mean power frequency, and mean EMG voltage during prolonged submaximal contractions. Muscle Nerve 12: 493-497, 1989.
4. Arendt-Nielsen L and Zwarts M. Measurement of muscle fiber conduction velocity in humans: techniques and applications. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 6: 173-190, 1989.
5. Balestra G, Frassinelli S, Knaflitz M, and Molinari F. Time-frequency analysis of surface myoelectric signals during athletic movement. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 20: 106-115, 2001.
6. Bernardi M, Felici F, Marchetti M, Montellanico F, Piacentini MF, and Solomonow M. Force generation performance and motor unit recruitment strategy in muscles of contralateral limbs. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 9: 121-130, 1999.
7. Bernardi M, Solomonow M, Nguyen G, Smith A, and Baratta R. Motor unit recruitment strategies changes with skill acquisition. Eur J Appl Physiol 74: 52-59, 1996.
8. Bigland-Ritchie B, Donovan EF, and Roussos CS. Conduction velocity and EMG power spectrum changes in fatigue of sustained maximal efforts. J Appl Physiol 51: 1300-1305, 1981.
9. Bilodeau M, Schindler-Ivens S, Williams DM, Chandran R, and Sharma SS. EMG frequency content changes with increasing force and during fatigue in the quadriceps femoris muscle of men and women. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 13: 83-92, 2003.
10. Blok JH, Stegeman DF, and van Oosterom A. Three-layer volume conductor model and software package for applications in surface electromyography. Ann Biomed Eng 30: 566-577, 2002.
11. Bonato P, Cheng MS, Gonzalez-Cueto J, Leardini A, O'Connor J, and Roy SH. EMG-based measures of fatigue during a repetitive squat exercise. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 20: 133-143, 2001.
12. Bonato P, Roy SH, Knaflitz M, and DeLuca CJ. Time-frequency parameters of the surface myoelectric signal for assessing muscle fatigue during cyclic dynamic contractions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 48: 745-753, 2001.
13. Day SJ and Hulliger M. Experimental simulation of cat electromyogram: evidence for algebraic summation of motor-unit action-potential trains. J Neurophysiol 86: 2144-2158, 2001.
14. De Luca CJ. The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics. J Appl Biomech 13: 135-163, 1997.
15. De Luca CJ and Merletti R. Surface myoelectric signal cross-talk among muscles of the leg. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 69: 568-575, 1988.
16. Deschenes MR, Giles JA, McCoy RW, Volek JS, Gomez AL, and Kraemer WJ. Neural factors account for strength decrements observed after short-term muscle unloading. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 282: R578-R583, 2002.
17. Dimitrova NA, Dimitrov V, and Nikitin OA. Neither high-pass filtering nor mathematical differentiation of the EMG signals can considerably reduce cross-talk. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 12: 235-246, 2002.
18. Disselhorst C, Silny J, and Rau G. Improvement of spatial resolution in surface-EMG: a theoretical and experimental comparison of different spatial filters. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 44: 567-574, 1997.
19. Disselhorst-Klug C, Bahm J, Ramaekers V, Trachterna A, and Rau G. Non-invasive approach of motor unit recording during muscle contractions in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 83: 144-150, 2000.
20. Englehart KB and Parker PA. Single motor unit myoelectric signal analysis with nonstationary data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 41: 168-180, 1994.
21. Enoka RM and Fuglevand AJ. Motor unit physiology: some unresolved issues. Muscle Nerve 24: 4-17, 2001.
22. Farina D, Cescon C, and Merletti R. Influence of anatomical, physical and detection-system parameters on surface EMG. Biol Cybern 86: 445-456, 2002.
23. Farina D, Fattorini L, Felici F, and Filligoi G. Nonlinear surface EMG analysis to detect changes of motor unit conduction velocity and synchronization. J Appl Physiol 93: 1753-1763, 2002.
24. Farina D, Fosci M, and Merletti R. Motor unit recruitment strategies investigated by surface EMG variables. J Appl Physiol 92: 235-247, 2002.
25. Farina D, Gazzoni M, and Merletti R. Assessment of low back muscle fatigue by surface EMG signal analysis: methodological aspects. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 13: 319-332, 2003.
26. Farina D and Merletti R. Comparison of algorithms for estimation of EMG variables during voluntary isometric contractions. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 10: 337-350, 2000.
27. Farina D and Merletti RR. A novel approach for precise simulation of the EMG signal detected by surface electrodes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 48: 637-646, 2001.
28. Farina D, Merletti R, Indino B, and Graven-Nielsen T. Surface EMG crosstalk evaluated from experimental recordings and simulated signals Reflections on crosstalk interpretation, quantification and reduction. Meth Inform Med. In press.
29. Farina D, Merletti R, Indino B, Nazzaro M, and Pozzo M. Cross-talk between knee extensor muscles. Experimental and model results. Muscle Nerve 26: 681-695, 2002.
30. Farina D, Merletti R, Nazzaro M, and Caruso I. Effect of joint angle on surface EMG variables for the muscles of the leg and thigh. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 20: 62-71, 2001.
31. Farina D, Mesin L, Martina S, and Merletti R. A surface EMG generation model with multi-layer cylindrical description of the volume conductor. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. In press.
32. Farina D, Muhammad W, Fortunato E, Meste O, Merletti R, and Rix H. Estimation of single motor unit conduction velocity from surface electromyogram signals detected with linear electrode arrays. Med Biol Eng Comput 39: 225-236, 2001.
33. Felici F, Rosponi A, Sbriccoli P, Filligoi GC, Fattorini L, and Marchetti M. Linear and non-linear analysis of surface electromyograms in weightlifters. Eur J Appl Physiol 84: 337-342, 2001.
34. Filligoi G and Felici F. Detection of hidden rhythms in surface EMG signals with a non-linear time-series tool. Med Eng Phys 21: 439-448, 1999.
35. Fuglevand AJ, Winter DA, and Patla AE. Models of recruitment and rate coding organization in motor unit pools. J Neurophysiol 70: 2470-2488, 1993.
36. a. Gazzoni M, Farina D, and Merletti R. A new method for the extraction and classification of single motor unit action potentials from surface EMG signals. J Neurosci Meth. In press.
37. Gerdle B, Eriksson NE, and Brundin L. The behaviour of the mean power frequency of the surface electromyogram in biceps brachii with increasing force and during fatigue. With special regard to the electrode distance. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 30: 483-489, 1990.
38. Gerdle B, Henriksson-Larsen K, Lorentzon R, and Wretling ML. Dependence of the mean power frequency of the electromyogram on muscle force and fibre type. Acta Physiol Scand 142: 457-465, 1991.
39. Gerdle B, Wretling ML, and Henriksson-Larsen K. Do the fibre-type proportion and the angular velocity influence the mean power frequency of the electromyogram? Acta Physiol Scand 134: 341-346, 1988.
40. Gibbs J, Harrison LM, and Stephens JA. Cross-correlation analysis of motor unit activity recorded from two separate thumb muscles during development in man. J Physiol 499: 255-266, 1997.
41. Gydikov A, Gerilovski L, Radicheva N, and Troyanova N. Influence of the muscle fiber end geometry on the extracellular potentials. Biol Cybern 54: 1-8, 1986.
42. Jensen C, Vasseljen O, and Westgaard RH. The influence of electrode position on bipolar surface electromyogram recordings of the upper trapezius muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol 67: 266-273, 1993.
43. Karlsson S and Gerdle B. Mean frequency and signal amplitude of the surface EMG of the quadriceps muscles increase with increasing torque-a study using the continuous wavelet transform. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 11: 131-140, 2001.
44. Karlsson S, Yu J, and Akay M. Time-frequency analysis of myoelectric signals during dynamic contractions: a comparative study. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 47: 228-238, 2000.
45. Keenan KG, Farina D, Maluf KS, Merletti R, and Enoka RM. Age-associated changes in motor unit properties reduce signal cancellation in the simulated electromyogram (Abstract). Soc Neurosci Abstr #914.11, 2003.
46. Kilner JM, Baker SN, and Lemon RN. A novel algorithm to remove electrical cross-talk between surface EMG recordings and its application to the measurement of short-term synchronisation in humans. J Physiol 538: 919-930, 2002.
47. Kleine BU, Stegeman DF, Mund D, and Anders C. Influence of motorneuron firing synchronization on SEMG characteristics in dependence of electrode position. J Appl Physiol 91: 1588-1599, 2001.
48. Kossev A, Gantchev N, Gydikov A, Gerasimenko Y, and Christova P. The effect of muscle fiber length change on motor units potentials propagation velocity. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 32: 287-294, 1992.
49. Lago P and Jones NB. Effect of motor unit firing time statistics on EMG spectra. Med Biol Eng Comput 15: 648-655, 1977.
50. Li W and Sakamoto K. The influence of location of electrode on muscle fiber conduction velocity and EMG power spectrum during voluntary isometric contractions measured with surface array electrodes. Appl Human Sci 15: 25-32, 1996.
51. Lindstrom L and Magnusson R. Interpretation of myoelectric power spectra: a model and its applications. Proc IEEE 65: 653-662, 1977.
52. Lowery MM, Stoykov NS, and Kuiken TA. A simulation study to examine the use of cross-correlation as an estimate of surface EMG cross talk. J Appl Physiol 94: 1324-1334, 2003.
53. Luttmann A, Jäger M, Sökeland J, and Laurig W. Joint analysis of aspectrum and amplitude (JASA) of electromyograms applied for the indication of muscular fatigue among surgeons in urology. In: Advances in Occupational Ergonomics and Safety, edited by Mital A, Krueger H, Kumar S, Menozzi M, and Fernandez JE. Cincinnati, OH: Int. Soc. for Occupational Ergonomics and Safety, 1996, p. 523-528.
54. Masuda T and Sadoyama T. Skeletal muscles from which the propagation of motor unit action potentials is detectable with surface electrode arrays. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 67: 421-427, 1987.
55. Merletti R, Farina D, and Gazzoni M. The linear electrode array: a useful tool with many applications. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 13: 37-47, 2003.
56. Merletti R, Farina D, and Granata A. Non-invasive assessment of motor unit properties with linear electrode arrays. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 50: 293-300, 1999.
57. Merletti R, Knaflitz M, and De Luca CJ. Myoelectric manifestations of fatigue in voluntary and electrically elicited contractions. J Appl Physiol 69: 1810-1820, 1990.
58. Merletti R and Lo Conte L. Surface EMG signal processing during isometric contractions. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 7: 241-250, 1997.
59. Milner-Brown HS, Mellenthin M, and Miller RG. Quantifying human muscle strength, endurance and fatigue. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 67: 530-535, 1986.
60. Mogk JP and Keir PJ. Crosstalk in surface electromyography of the proximal forearm during gripping tasks. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 13: 63-71, 2003.
61. Moritani T and Muro M. Motor unit activity and surface electromyogram power spectrum during increasing force of contraction. Eur J Appl Physiol 56: 260-265, 1987.
62. Morrenhof JW and Abbink HJ. Cross-correlation and cross-talk in surface electromyography. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 25: 73-79, 1985.
63. Myers LJ, Lowery M, O'Malley M, Vaughan CL, Heneghan C, St Clair Gibson A., Harley YXR, and Sreenivasan R. Rectification and non-linear pre-processing of EMG signals for cortico-muscular analysis. J Neurosci Methods 124: 157-165, 2003.
64. Nieminen H and Takala EP. Evidence of deterministic chaos in the myoelectric signal. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 36: 49-58, 1996.
65. Nishizono H, Kurata H, and Miyashita M. Muscle fiber conduction velocity related to stimulation rate. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 72: 529-534, 1989.
66. Nordstrom MA, Fuglevand AJ, and Enoka RM. Estimating the strength of common input to human motoneurons from the cross-correlogram. J Physiol 453: 547-574, 1992.
67. Paiss O and Inbar G. Autoregressive modelling of surface EMG and its spectrum with application to fatigue. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 34: 761-770, 1987.
68. Petrofsky JS and Lind AR. Frequency analysis of the surface EMG during sustained isometric contractions. Eur J Appl Physiol 43: 173-182, 1980.
69. Rainoldi A, Galardi G, Maderna L, Comi G, Lo Conte L, and Merletti R. Repeatability of surface EMG variables during voluntary isometric contractions of the biceps brachii muscle. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 9: 105-119, 1999.
70. Reucher H, Rau G, and Silny J. Spatial filtering of noninvasive multielectrode EMG. Part I. Introduction to measuring technique and applications. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 34: 98-105, 1987.
71. Reucher H, Silny J, and Rau G. Spatial filtering of noninvasive multielectrode EMG. Part II. Filter performance in theory and modeling. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 34: 106-113, 1987.
72. Roy SH, De Luca CJ, and Schneider J. Effects of electrode location on myoelectric conduction velocity and median frequency estimates. J Appl Physiol 61: 1510-1517, 1986.
73. Saitou K, Masuda T, Michikami D, Kojima R, and Okada M. Innervation zones of the upper and lower limb muscles estimated by using multichannel surface EMG. J Hum Ergol (Tokyo) 29: 35-52, 2000.
74. Solomonow M, Baten C, Smith J, Baratta R, Hermens H, D'Ambrosia R, and Shoji H. Electromyogram power spectra frequencies associated with motor unit recruitment strategies. J Appl Physiol 68: 1177-1185, 1990.
75. Tesch PA, Komi PV, Jacobs I, Karlsson J, and Viitasalo JT. Influence of lactate accumulation of EMG frequency spectrum during repeated concentric contractions. Acta Physiol Scand 119: 61-67, 1983.
76. Tokunaga T, Baba S, Tanaka M, Kashiwagi K, Kimura K, and Kawazoe T. Two-dimensional configuration of the myoneural junctions of human masticatory muscle detected with matrix electrode. J Oral Rehabil 25: 329-334, 1998.
77. Troni W, Cantello R, and Rainero I. Conduction velocity along human muscle fibers in situ. Neurology 33: 1453-1459, 1983.
78. Van Boxtel A and Shomaker LRB. Influence of motor unit firing statistics on the median frequency of the EMG power spectrum. Eur J Appl Physiol 52: 207-213, 1984.
79. Viitasalo JT and Komi PV. Interrelationships of EMG signal characteristics at different levels of muscle tension during fatigue. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 18: 167-178, 1978.
80. Wakeling JM, Pascual SA, Nigg BM, and von Tscharner V. Surface EMG shows distinct populations of muscle activity when measured during sustained sub-maximal exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 86: 40-47, 2001.
81. Webber CL, Schmidt MA, and Walsh SM. Influence of isometric loading on biceps EMG dynamics as assessed by linear and non linear tools. J Appl Physiol 78: 814-822, 1995.
82. Westbury JR and Shaughnessy TG. Associations between spectral representation of the surface electromyogram and fiber type distribution and size in human masseter muscle. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 27: 427-435, 1987.
83. Weytjens JL and van Steenberghe D. The effects of motor unit synchronization on the power spectrum of the electromyogram. Biol Cybern 51: 71-77, 1984.
84. Winter DA, Fuglevand AJ, and Archer SE. Crosstalk in surface electromyography: theoretical and practical estimates. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 4: 15-26, 1994.
85. Yao W, Fuglevand AJ, and Enoka RM. Motor-unit synchronization increases EMG amplitude and decreases force steadiness of simulated contractions. J Neurophysiol 83: 441-452, 2000.
86. Zwarts MJ, Drost G, and Stegeman DF. Recent progress in the diagnostic use of surface EMG for neurological diseases. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 10: 287-291, 2000.
87. Zwarts MJ and Stegeman DF. Multichannel surface EMG: basic aspects and clinical utility. Muscle Nerve 28: 1-17, 2003.