Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 241-246

  Celik, Erkan ^c   Polat Ozsoy, Omur ^a   Toygar Memikoglu, T Ufuk ^b  

^a BASKENT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHIN; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INCISOR; LIP; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; NASAL BONE; NOSE; PATHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELLA TURCICA; STATISTICS; TIME; TOOTH OCCLUSION; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

CEPHALOMETRY; CHIN; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INCISOR; LIP; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; NASAL BONE; NOSE; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELLA TURCICA; SOFTWARE; TIME FACTORS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VERTICAL DIMENSION;

EID: 67249124684     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: 14602210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjn105     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Baumrind S , Frantz R C 1971a The reliability of head film measurements 1. Landmark identification . American Journal of Orthodontics 60 : 111-127
2. Baumrind S , Frantz R C 1971b The reliability of head film measurements 2. Conventional angular and linear measures . American Journal of Orthodontics 60 : 505-517
3. Brannan J 2002 An introduction to digital radiography in dentistry . Journal of Orthodontics 29 : 66-69
4. Brodie A G 1941 On the growth pattern of the human head from the third month to the eighth year of life . American Journal of Anatomy 68 : 209-262
5. Bruntz L Q , Palomo J M , Baden S , Hans M G 2006 A comparison of scanned lateral cephalograms with corresponding original radiographs . American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 130 : 340-348
6. Chen Y J , Chen S K , Chan H F , Chen K C 2000 Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer-aided digital cephalometry . Angle Orthodontist 70 : 387-392
7. Chen Y J , Chen S K , Yao J C , Chang H F 2004 The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry . Angle Orthodontist 74 : 155-161
8. Geelen W , Wenzel A , Gotfredsen E , Kruger M , Hansson L-G 1998 Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks in conventional film, hardcopy and monitor-displayed images obtained by the storage phosphor technique . European Journal of Orthodontics 20 : 331-340
9. Gregston M D , Kula T , Hardman P , Glaros A , Kula K 2004 Comparison of conventional and digital radiographic methods and cephalometric analysis software: I. Hard tissue . Seminars in Orthodontics 10 : 204-211
10. Houston W J B 1983 The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements . American Journal of Orthodontics 83 : 382-390
11. Houston W J B , Maher R E , McElroy D , Sherriff M 1986 Sources of error in measurements from cephalometric radiographs . European Journal of Orthodontics 8 : 149-151
12. Kublashvili T , Kula K , Glaros A , Hardman P , Kula T 2004 A comparison of conventinal and digital radiographic methods and cephalometric analysis software: II. Soft tissue . Seminars in Orthodontics 10 : 212-219
13. Macrì V , Wenzel A 1993 Reliability of landmark recording on film and digital lateral cephalograms . European Journal of Orthodontics 15 : 137-148
14. Melsen B , Baumrind S 1995 Clinical research application of cephalometry . In: Athanasiou A (ed.) Orthodontic cephalometry . Mosby-Wolfe , St Louis , pp. 181-202
15. Nimkarn Y , Miles P G 1995 Reliability of computer-generated cephalometrics . International Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery 10 : 43-52
16. Oliver R G 1991 Cephalometric analysis comparing five different methods . British Journal of Orthodontics 18 : 277-283
17. Ongkosuwito E M , Katsaros C , van ' t Hof M A , Bodegom J C , Kuijpers-Jagtman A M 2002 The reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: a comparison of analogue and digital methods . European Journal of Orthodontics 24 : 655-665
18. Quintero J C , Trosien A , Hatcher D , Kapila S 1999 Craniofacial imaging in orthodontics: historical perspective, current status, and future developments . Angle Orthodontist 69 : 491-506
19. Ricketts R M 1981 Perspectives in clinical application of cephalometrics . Angle Orthodontist 51 : 115-150
20. Sandler P J 1988 Reproducibility of cephalometric measurements . British Journal of Orthodontist 15 : 105-110
21. Santoro M , Jarjoura K , Cangialosi T J 2006 Accuracy of digital and analogue cephalometric measurements assessed with the sandwich technique . American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 129 : 345-351
22. Sayinsu K , Isik F , Trakyali G , Arun T 2007 An evaluation of the errors in cephalometric measurements on scanned cephalometric images and conventional tracing . European Journal of Orthodontics 29 : 105-108