A comparison of scanned lateral cephalograms with corresponding original radiographs

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 130, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 340-348

  Bruntz, Lance Q ^a   Palomo, J Martin ^b   Baden, Sally ^b   Hans, Mark G ^b  

^a Department of Orthodontics ^*

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTICS; PRINTING; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; X RAY FILM;

ARTIFACTS; CEPHALOMETRY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; ORTHODONTICS; PRINTING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC MAGNIFICATION; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; X-RAY INTENSIFYING SCREENS;

EID: 33748467800     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.12.029     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Moyers R.E., and Bookstein F.L. The inappropriateness of conventional cephalometrics. Am J Orthod 75 (1979) 599-617
2. Baskin H.N., and Cisneros G.J. A comparison of two computer cephalometric programs. J Clin Orthod 31 (1997) 231-233
3. Forsyth D.B., Shaw W.C., and Richmond S. Digital imaging of cephalometric radiography, part 1: advantages and limitations of digital imaging. Angle Orthod 66 (1996) 37-42
4. Rogers M.B. Duplication of x-rays by scanning. J Clin Orthod 36 (2002) 208-209
5. Hans M.G., Palomo J.M., Dean D., Cakirer B., Min K.J., Han S., et al. Three-dimensional imaging: the Case Western Reserve University method. Semin Orthod 7 (2001) 233-243
6. Baumrind S., and Miller D.M. Computer-aided head film analysis: the University of California San Francisco method. Am J Orthod 78 (1980) 41-65
7. Marci V., and Wenzel A. Reliability of landmark recording on film and digital lateral cephalograms. Eur J Orthod 15 (1993) 137-148
8. Nimkarn Y., and Miles P.G. Reliability of computer-generated cephalometrics. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 10 (1995) 43-52
9. O'Callaghan. Spatial resolution of cephalometric radiographs (1993), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland [thesis]
10. Baumrind S., and Frantz R.C. The reliability of head film measurements 1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod 60 (1971) 111-127
11. Baumrind S., and Frantz R.C. The reliability of head film measurements 2. Conventional angular and linear measurements. Am J Orthod 60 (1971) 505-517
12. Chen Y.J., Chen J.K., Chang H.F., and Chen K.C. Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer-aided digital cephalometry. Angle Orthod 70 (2000) 387-392
13. Jackson P.H., Dickson G.C., and Birnie D.J. Digital image processing of cephalometric radiographs: a preliminary report. Br J Orthod 12 (1985) 122-132
14. Eppley B.L., and Sadove A.M. Computerized digital enhancement in craniofacial cephalometric radiography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49 (1991) 1038-1043
15. Wenzel A. Effect of image enhancement for detectability of bone lesions in digitized intraoral radiographs. Scand J Dent Res 96 (1988) 149-160
16. Davis D.N., and Mackay F. Reliability of cephalometric analysis using manual and interactive computer methods. Br J Orthod 18 (1991) 105-109
17. Held C.L., Ferguson D.J., and Gallo M.W. Cephalometric digitization: a determination of the minimum scanner settings necessary for precise landmark identification. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 119 (2001) 472-481
18. Björk A. Variations in the growth pattern of the human mandible: longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method. J Dent Res 42 (1963) 400-411
19. Doppel D.M., Damon W.M., Joondeph D.R., and Little R.M. An investigation of maxillary superimposition techniques using metallic implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 105 (1994) 161-168
20. Elmajian K.E. A serial study of facial growth as related to cranial base morphology [thesis] (1959), University of Washington, Seattle