The reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: A comparison of analogue and digital methods

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 655-665

  Ongkosuwito, E M ^a   Katsaros, C ^a   Van't Hof, M A ^a   Bodegom, J C ^a   Kuijpers Jagtman, A M ^a,b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Dept of Orthodontics and Oral Biol ^*  (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INCISOR; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS;

CEPHALOMETRY; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INCISOR; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0036987542     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/24.6.655     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Baumrind S, Frantz R C 1971a The reliability of cephalometric radiograph measurements. 1. Landmark identification. American Journal of Orthodontics 60: 111-127
2. Baumrind S, Frantz R C 1971b The reliability of head film measurements. 2. Conventional angular and linear measures. American Journal of Orthodontics 60: 505-517
3. Björk A, Solow B 1961 Measurements on radiographs. Journal of Dental Research 41: 672-683
4. Chen Y J, Chen S K, Chang H F, Chen K C 2000 Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer-aided digital cephalometry. Angle Orthodontist 70: 387-392
5. Davis D N, Mackay F 1991 Reliability of cephalometric analysis using manual and interactive computer methods. British Journal of Orthodontics 18: 105-109
6. Geelen W, Wenzel A, Gotfredsen E, Kruger M, Hansson L G 1998 Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional film, hardcopy, and monitor-displayed images obtained by the storage phosphor technique. European Journal of Orthodontics 20: 331-340
7. Goldberg M A, Pivovarov M, Mayo-Smith W W 1994 Application of wavelet compression to digital radiographs. American Journal of Roentgenology 163: 463-468
8. Houston W J 1979 The application of computer aided digital analysis to orthodontic records. European Journal of Orthodontics 1: 71-79
9. Houston W J B 1983 The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. American Journal of Orthodontics 83: 382-390
10. Houston W J B, Maher R E, McElroy D, Sherriff M 1986 Sources of error in measurements from cephalometric radiographs. European Journal of Orthodontics 8: 149-151
11. Lim K F, Foong K W 1997 Phosphor-stimulated computed cephalometry: reliability of landmark identification. British Journal of Orthodontics 24: 301-308
12. Liu J-K, Chen Y C, Cheng K S 2000 Accuracy of computerized automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 118: 535-540
13. MacMahon H, Doi K, Sanada S 1991 Data compression: effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography. Radiology 178: 175-179.
14. Macrì V, Wenzel A 1993 Reliability of landmark recording on film and digital lateral cephalograms. European Journal of Orthodontics 15: 137-148
15. Nimkarn Y, Miles P G 1995 Reliability of computer-generated cephalometrics. International Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery 10: 43-52
16. Oliver R G 1990 Cephalometric analysis comparing five different methods. British Journal of Orthodontics 18: 277-283
17. Richardson A 1981 A comparison of traditional and computerised methods of cephalometric analysis. European Journal of Orthodontics 3: 15-20
18. Rudolph D J, Sinclair P M, Coggins J M 1998 Automatic computerised radiographic identification of cephalometric landmarks. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 113: 173-179
19. Stirrups D R 1989 A comparison of the accuracy of cephalometric landmark location between two screen/ film combinations. Angle Orthodontist 59: 211-215
20. Thijssen M 1993 [Definition and control of image quality in radiographic diagnostics] Bepaling en bewaking van de beeldkwaliteit in de radiodiagnostiek. PhD Thesis. Universiteitsdrukkerij KUN (Netherlands), pp. 1-164