A comparison of conventional and digital radiographic methods and cephalometric analysis software: II. Soft tissue

Seminars in Orthodontics

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 212-219

  Kublashvili, Tamara ^a   Kula, Katherine ^a   Glaros, Alan ^a   Hardman, Patrick ^a   Kula, Theodore ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; FACE PROFILE; IMAGING SYSTEM; RADIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; RELIABILITY; SOFT TISSUE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 11144303561     PISSN: 10738746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.sodo.2004.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. C.J. Burstone Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning Am J Orthod 53 1967 262-284
2. R.M. Ricketts Esthetics, environment, and the law of lip relation Am J Orthod 54 1968 272-289
3. R.T. Bergman Cephalometric soft tissue facial analysis Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 116 1999 373-389
4. J.D. Subtelny A soft tissue profile, growth and treatment changes Angle Orthod 31 1961 105-122
5. W. Geelen A. Wenzel E. Gotfredsen et al. Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional film, hardcopy, and monitor-displayed images obtained by the storage phosphor technique Eur J Orthod 20 1998 331-340
6. K. Hagemann D. Vollmer T. Niegel et al. Prospective study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms J Orofac Orthoped 61 2000 91-99
7. B. Eppley M. Sadove Computerized digital enhancement in craniofacial cephalometric radiography J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49 1991 1038-1043
8. Y.A. Mostafa N.H. Mangoury A. Salah et al. Automated cephalometric soft-tissue analysis J Clin Orthod 9 1990 539-543
9. A. Farman T. Farman Extraoral and panoramic systems Dent Clin N Am 44 2000 257-272
10. J. Menig The DenOptix digital radiographic system J Clin Orthod 33 1999 407-410
11. P. Van der Stelt Principles of digital imaging Dent Clin N Am 44 2000 237-248
12. C.F. Hildebolt R.A. Couture B.R. Whiting Dental photostimulable phosphor radiography Dent Clin North Am 44 2000 273-297
13. K. Seki T. Okano Exposure reduction in cephalography with a digital photostimulable phosphor imaging system Dentomaxillofac Radiol 22 1993 127-130
14. K.F. Lim K.W. Foong Phosphor-stimulated computed cephalometry: reliability of landmark identification Br J Orthod 24 1997 301-308
15. E.B. Naslund M. Kruger A. Petersson et al. Analysis of low-dose digital lateral cephalometric radiographs Dentomaxillofac Radiol 27 1998 136-139
16. D.B. Forsyth F.D.C. Morth W.C. Shaw Digital imaging of cephalometric radiographs, part 2 Image quality Angle Orthod 66 1996 43-50
17. M. Gregston T. Kula P. Hardman et al.A comparison of conventional and digital radiographic methods and cephalometric analysis software Hard tissue landmarks Semin Orthod 10 2004 204-211
18. R.A. Holdaway A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I Am J Orthod 84 1983 1-28
19. C.C. Steiner The use of cephalometrics as an aid to planning and assessing orthodontic treatment Am J Orthod 46 1960 721-735
20. P.J. Wisth O.E. Boe The reliability of cephalometric soft tissue measurements Arch Oral Biol 20 1975 595-599
21. S. Baumrind R. Frantz The reliability of head film measurements, 2.conventional angular and linear measures Am J Orthod 60 1971 505-517
22. E.L. Gottlieb A.H. Nelson D.S. Vogels III Study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures Clin Orthod 30 1996 615-629
23. H.N. Baskin G.J. Cisneros A comparison of two computer programs J Clin Orthod 1997 231-233