A comparison of conventional and digital radiographic methods and cephalometric analysis software: I. Hard tissue

Seminars in Orthodontics

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 204-211

  Gregston, Mark D ^a   Kula, Theodore ^b   Hardman, Patrick ^b   Glaros, Alan ^b   Kula, Katherine ^b  

^a Ramstein Air Base   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; DISPERSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; RELIABILITY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 11144281350     PISSN: 10738746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.sodo.2004.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. D.B. Forsyth F.D.C. Morth W.C. Shaw et al. Digital imaging of cephalometric radiography, part 1 Advantages and limitation of digital imaging Angle Orthod 66 1996 37-42
2. K. Seki T. Okano Exposure reduction in cephalography with a digital photostimulable phosphor imaging system Dentomaxillofac Radiol 22 1993 127-130
3. A. Lackey The integration of filmless radiology in a restorative general practice CDA J 26 1998 906-913
4. K. Hagemann D. Vollmer T. Niegel et al. Prospective study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms J Orofac Orthoped 61 2000 91-99
5. H.P. Busch Digital radiography for clinical applications Eur J Radiol 7 1997 S66-S72
6. W.J.B. Houston A comparison of the reliability of measurement of cephalometric radiographs by tracings and direct digitization Swed Dent J Suppl 15 1982 99-103
7. K.F. Lim K.W.C. Foong Phosphor-stimulated computed cephalometry: Reliability of landmark identification Br J Orthod 24 1997 301-308
8. W. Geelen A. Wenzel E. Gotfredsen et al. Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional film, hardcopy, and monitor-displayed images obtained by the storage phosphor technique Eur J Orthod 20 1998 331-340
9. J.W. Oestmann R. Greene Single exposure simultaneous acquisition of digital and conventional radiographs utilizing unaltered dose Eur J Radiol 8 1988 258-260
10. A.J. Wilson O.C. West Single-exposure conventional and computed radiography-The hybrid cassette revisited Investig Radiol 28 1993 409-412
11. A.J. Wilson F.A. Mann O.C. West et al. Evaluation of the injured cervical spine: Comparison of conventional and storage phosphor radiography with a hybrid cassette Radiol 193 1994 419-422
12. S. Baumrind R. Frantz The reliability of head film measurements 1. Landmark identification Am J Orthod 60 1971 111-127
13. P.J. Sandler Reproducibility of cephalometric measurements Br J Orthod 15 1988 105-110
14. C.L. Heid D.J. Ferguson M.W. Gallo Cephalometric digitization A determination of the minimum scanner settings necessary for precise landmark identification Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 119 2001 472-481
15. H. Baskin G. Cisneros A comparison of two computer cephalometric programs J Clin Orthod 311997 231-233