Puzzle of protein complexes in vivo: A present and future challenge for functional proteomics

Expert Review of Proteomics

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 159-169

  Monti, Maria ^a   Cozzolino, Marianna ^a   Cozzolino, Flora ^a   Vitiello, Giuseppina ^a   Tedesco, Roberta ^a   Flagiello, Angela ^a   Pucci, Piero ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

Affinity purification; Functional proteomics; Gel filtration; Immunoprecipitation; Prefractionation strategies; Systems biology; Ultracentrifugation

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; INITIATION FACTOR; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE; TRANSLATION INITIATION FACTOR 4E; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; PROTEIN;

BINDING AFFINITY; BIOTINYLATION; COMPLEX FORMATION; DATA BASE; FUNCTIONAL PROTEOMICS; GEL FILTRATION CHROMATOGRAPHY; GEL PERMEATION CHROMATOGRAPHY; IMMOBILIZATION; IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; IN VIVO STUDY; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN ISOLATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN PURIFICATION; REVIEW; ULTRACENTRIFUGATION; ANIMAL; METHODOLOGY; PROTEOMICS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS;

EID: 66849125767     PISSN: 14789450     EISSN: 17448387     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/epr.09.7     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. Kobayashi Y, Weigel D. Move on up, it's time for change - mobile signals controlling photoperiod-dependent flowering. Genes Dev. 21, 2371-2384 (2007).
2. Qiu Z, Ghosh A. A calcium-dependent switch in a CREST-BRG1 complex regulates activity-dependent gene expression. Neuron 60, 775-787 (2008).
3. Michaud GA, Snyder M. Proteomic approaches for the global analysis of proteins. Biotechniques 33, 1308-1316 (2002).
4. Souchelnytskyi S. Proteomics in studies of signal transduction in epithelial cells. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 7, 359-371 (2002).
5. de la Fuente van Bentem S, Mentzen WI, de la Fuente A et al. Towards functional phosphoproteomics by mapping differential phosphorylation events in signalling networks. Proteomics 8, 4453-4465 (2008).
6. Lecaudey V, Cakan-Akdogan G, Norton WH et al. Dynamic FGF signaling couples morphogenesis and migration in the zebrafish lateral line primordium. Development 135, 2695-2705 (2008).
7. Pfeifer AC, Timmer J, Klingmüller U. Systems biology of JAK/STAT signalling. Essays Biochem. 45, 109-120 (2008).
8. Zak DE, Aderem A. Systems biology of innate immunity. Immunol. Rev. 227, 264-282 (2009).
9. Schlieker CD, Van der Veen AG, Damon JR et al. A functional proteomics approach links the ubiquitin-related modifier Urm1 to a tRNA modification pathway. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 18255-18260 (2008).
10. Souza TA, Chen X, Guo Y et al. Proteomic identification and functional validation of activins and bone morphogenetic protein 11 as candidate novel muscle mass regulators. Endocrinology 22, 2689-2702 (2008).
11. Brown KA, Ham AJ, Clark CN et al. Identification of novel Smad2 and Smad3 associated proteins in response to TGF-β1. J. Cell. Biochem. 105, 596-611 (2008).
12. Wright CW, Duckett CS. The aryl hydrocarbon nuclear translocator alters CD30-mediated NF-βB-dependent transcription. Science 323, 251-255 (2009).
13. Markillie LM, Lin CT, Adkins JN et al. Simple protein complex purification and identification method for high-throughput mapping of protein interaction networks. J. Proteome Res. 4, 268-274 (2005).
14. Wu F, Wang P, Young LC et al. Proteome-wide identification of novel binding partners to the oncogenic fusion gene protein, NPM-ALK, using tandem affinity purification and mass spectrometry. Am. J. Pathol. 174, 361-370 (2009).
15. Zada AA, Pulikkan JA, Bararia D et al. Proteomic discovery of Max as a novel interacting partner of C/EBPa: a Myc/ Max/Mad link. Leukemia 20, 2137-2146 (2006).
16. Terpe K. Overview of tag protein fusions: from molecular and biochemical fundamentals to commercial systems. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 60, 523-533 (2003).
17. Meier N, Krpic S, Rodriguez P et al. Novel binding partners of Ldb1 are required for haematopoietic development. Development 133, 4913-4923 (2006).
18. Henkin JA, Jennings ME, Matthews DE et al. Mass processing - an improved technique for protein identification with mass spectrometry data. J. Biomol. Tech. 15, 230-237 (2004).
19. Orrù S, Aspesi A, Armiraglio M et al. Analysis of the ribosomal protein S19 interactome. Mol. Cell Proteomics 6, 382-393 (2007).
20. Scholten A, van Veen TA, Vos MA et al. Diversity of cAMP-dependent protein kinase isoforms and their anchoring proteins in mouse ventricular tissue. J. Proteome Res. 6, 1705-1717 (2007).
21. Fraldi A, Zito E, Annunziata F et al. Multistep, sequential control of the trafficking and function of the multiple sulfatase deficiency gene product, SUMF1 by PDI, ERGIC-53 and ERp44. Hum. Mol. Genet. 17, 2610-2621 (2008).
22. Pisa V, Cozzolino M, Gargiulo S et al. The molecular chaperone Hsp90 is a component of the cap-binding complex and interacts with the translational repressor Cup during Drosophila oogenesis. Gene 432, 67-74 (2009).
23. Bowen C, Stuart A, Ju JH et al. NKX3.1 homeodomain protein binds to topoisomerase I and enhances its activity. Cancer Res. 67, 455-464 (2007).
24. Köcher T, Superti-Furga G. Mass spectrometry-based functional proteomics: from molecular machines to protein networks. Nat. Methods 4, 807-815 (2007).
25. Lee PY, Bae KH, Kho CW et al. Interactome analysis of yeast glutathione peroxidase 3. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 18, 1364-1367 (2008).
26. Gavin AC, Aloy P, Grandi P et al. Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 440, 631-636 (2006).
27. Krogan NJ, Cagney G, Yu H et al. Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 440, 637-643 (2006).
28. Banks E, Nabieva E, Chazelle B et al. Organization of physical interactomes as uncovered by network schemas. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000203 (2008).
29. Zhang B, Park BH, Karpinets T et al. From pull-down data to protein interaction networks and complexes with biological relevance. Bioinformatics 24, 979-986 (2008).
30. Klein T, P Geurink P, S Overkleeft H, et al. Functional proteomics on zinc-dependent metalloproteinases using inhibitor probes. ChemMedChem. 4, 164-170 (2008).
31. Rix U, Hantschel O, Dürnberger G et al. Chemical proteomic profiles of the BCR-ABL inhibitors imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib reveal novel kinase and nonkinase targets. Blood 110, 4055-4063 (2007).
32. Remsing Rix LL, Rix U, Colinge J et al. Global target profile of the kinase inhibitor bosutinib in primary chronic myeloid leukemia cells. Leukemia DOI: 10.1038 (2008) (Epub ahead of print).
33. Aye TT, Mohammed S, Toorn HW et al. Selectivity in enrichment of PKA RI and RII isoforms and their interactors using modified cAMP affinity resins. Mol. Cell Proteomics. (2008) (Epub ahead of print).
34. Jackson RJ. Alternative mechanisms of initiating translation of mammalian mRNAs. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 33, 1231-1241 (2005).
35. Lasko P. The Drosophila melanogaster genome: translation factors and RNA binding proteins. J. Cell Biol. 150, 51-56 (2000).
36. Kozak M. Initiation of translation in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Gene 234, 187-208 (1999).
37. Russo A, Cirulli C, Amoresano A et al. Cis-acting sequences and trans-acting factors in the localization of mRNA for mitochondrial ribosomal proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1779, 820-829 (2008).
38. Lin JY, Li ML, Huang PN et al. Heterogeneous nuclear ribonuclear protein K interacts with the enterovirus 71 5′ untranslated region and participates in virus replication. J. Gen. Virol. 89, 2540-2549 (2008).
39. Medugno L, Costanzo P, Lupo A et al. A novel zinc finger transcriptional repressor, ZNF224, interacts with the negative regulatory element (AldA-NRE) and inhibits gene expression. FEBS Lett. 534, 93-100 (2003).
40. Hall-Pogar T, Liang S, Hague LK et al. Specific trans-acting proteins interact with auxiliary RNA polyadenylation elements in the COX-2 3′-UTR. RNA 13, 1103-1115 (2007).
41. Lambert JP, Mitchell L, Rudner A et al. A novel proteomic approach for the discovery of chromatin associated protein networks. Mol. Cell Proteomics (2008) (Epub ahead of print).
42. Aebersold R, Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 422, 198-207 (2003).
43. Monti M, Orrù S, Pagnozzi D et al. Functional proteomics. Clin. Chim. Acta 357, 140-150 (2005).
44. Monti M, Orrù S, Pagnozzi D et al. Interaction proteomics. Biosci Rep. 25, 45-56 (2005).
45. Gavin AC, Bösche M, Krause R et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 415, 141-147 (2002).
46. HoY, GruhlerA, Heilbut A et al. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature 415, 180-183 (2002).
47. Goll J, Uetz P. The elusive yeast interactome. Genome Biol. 7, 223 (2006).
48. Parcellier A, Schmitt E, Gurbuxani S et al. hsp27 is a ubiquitin-binding protein involved in I-κBα proteasomal degradation. Mol. Cell Biol. 23, 5790-5802 (2003).
49. Loyer P, Trembley JH, Grenet JA et al. Characterization of cyclin L1 and L2 interactions with CDK11 and splicing factors. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 7721-7732 (2008).
50. Liu X, Yang WC, Gao Q et al. Toward chromatographic analysis of interacting protein networks. J. Chromatogr. A 1178, 24-32 (2008).
51. Tanese N. Small-scale density gradient sedimentation to separate and analyze multiprotein complexes. Methods 12, 224-234 (1997).
52. Vogelmann R, Nelson WJ. Fractionation of the epithelial apical junctional complex: reassessment of protein distributions in different substructures. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 701-716 (2005).
53. Dörr J, Kartarius S, Götz C et al. Contribution of the individual subunits of protein kinase CK2 and of hPrp3p to the splicing process. Mol. Cell Biochem. 316, 187-193 (2008).
54. Schägger H, von Jagow G. Blue native electrophoresis for isolation of membrane protein complexes in enzymatically active form. Anal. Biochem. 199, 223-231 (1991).
55. Camacho-Carvajal MM, Wollscheid B, Aebersold R et al. Two-dimensional blue native/SDS gel electrophoresis of multi-protein complexes from whole cellular lysates: a proteomics approach. Mol. Cell Proteomics 3, 176-182 (2004).
56. Krause F. Detection and analysis of protein-protein interactions in organellar and prokaryotic proteomes by native gel electrophoresis: (membrane) protein complexes and supercomplexes. Electrophoresis 27, 2759-2781 (2006).
57. Selbach M, Mann M. Protein interaction screening by quantitative immunoprecipitation combined with knockdown (QUICK). Nat. Methods 3, 981-983 (2006).
58. Castle JD. Purification of organelles from mammalian cells. Curr. Protoc. Immunol. 8, 8.1B (2003).
59. Chang J, Ruiz V, Vancura A. Purification of yeast membranes and organelles by sucrose density gradient centrifugation. Methods Mol. Biol. 457, 141-149 (2008).
60. Wilhelm JE, Hilton M, Amos Q et al. Cup is an eIF4E binding protein required for both the translational repression of oskar and the recruitment of Barentsz. J. Cell Biol. 163, 1197-1204 (2003).
61. Nakamura A, Sato K, Hanyu-Nakamura K. Drosophila cup is an eIF4E binding protein that associates with Bruno and regulates oskar mRNA translation in oogenesis. Dev. Cell 6, 69-78 (2004).
62. Clouse KN, Ferguson SB, Schupbach T. Squid, Cup, and PABP55B function together to regulate gurken translation in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 313, 713-724 (2008).
63. Richter JD, Sonenberg N. Regulation of cap-dependent translation by eIF4E inhibitory proteins. Nature 433, 477-480 (2005).
64. Holaska JM, Wilson KL. An emerin "proteome": purification of distinct emerin-containing complexes from HeLa cells suggests molecular basis for diverse roles including gene regulation, mRNA splicing, signaling, mechanosensing, and nuclear architecture. Biochemistry 46, 8897-8908 (2007).