Phylogeny of snout butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Libytheinae): Combining evidence from the morphology of extant, fossil, and recently extinct taxa

Cladistics

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 263-278

  Kawahara, Akito Y ^a  

^a Bldg 142   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; CLADISTICS; FOSSIL RECORD; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; TAXONOMY;

LEPIDOPTERA; LIBYTHEA; LIBYTHEANA; LIBYTHEINAE; NYMPHALIDAE;

EID: 66649113404     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: 10960031     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00251.x     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Ackery, P.R., 1984. Systematic and faunistic studies on butterflies. In : Vane-Wright, R.I., Ackery, P.R. (Eds The Biology of Butterflies. Academic Press, London.
2. Ackery, P.R., de Jong, R., Vane-Wright, R.I., 1998. The butterflies: Hedyloidea, Hesperoidea and Papilionoidea. In : Kristensen, N.P. (Ed Lepidoptera, Moths and Butterflies 1: Evolution, Systematics and Biogeography. de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, pp. 263 300.
3. Anderson, J.S., 2001. The phylogenetic trunk: maximal inclusion of taxa with missing data in an analysis of the Lepospondyli (Vertebrata, Tetrapoda). Syst. Biol. 50, 170 193.
4. Ax, P., 1987. The Phylogenetic System: the Systematization of Organisms on the Basis of Their Phylogenesis. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
5. Bremer, K., 1988. The limits of amino-acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42, 795 803.
6. Bremer, K., 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10, 295 310.
7. Brower, A.V.Z., 2000. Phylogenetic relationships among the Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera) inferred from partial sequences of the wingless gene. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 267, 1201 1211.
8. Carpenter, J.M., 1992. Random cladistics. Cladistics 8, 147 153.
9. Carpenter, J.M., 1996. Uninformative bootstrapping. Cladistics 12, 177 181.
10. Cobbett, A., Wilkinson, M., Wills, M.A., 2007. Fossils impact as hard as living taxa in parsimony analyses of morphology. Syst. Biol. 56, 753 766.
11. Cole, R., Hariharan, R., 1996. An O(n log n) algorithm for the maximum agreement subtree problem for binary trees. In : Tardos, E. (Ed Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. ACM Special Interest Group for Algorithms and Computation Theory, SIAM, Atlanta, pp. 323 332.
12. Corbet, A.S., Pendlebury, H.M., 1978. The Butterflies of the Malay Peninsula. Malayan Nature Society, Kuala Lumpur.
13. Donoghue, M.J., Doyle, J.A., Gauthier, J., Kluge, A.G., Rowe, T., 1989. The importance of fossils in phylogeny reconstruction. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20, 431 460.
14. Ehrlich, P.R., 1958. The comparative morphology, phylogeny and higher classification of the butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea). Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull. 34, 305 370.
15. Ehrlich, P.R., Ehrlich, A.H., 1967. The phenetic relationships of the butterflies. I. Adult taxonomy and the non-specificity hypothesis. Syst. Zool. 16, 301 317.
16. Farris, J.S., Albert, V.A., Källersjö, M., Lispcomb, D., Kluge, A.G., 1996. Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining. Cladistics 12, 99 124.
17. Fracker, S.B., 1915. The classification of lepidopterous larvae. Illinois Biol. Monog. 2, 1 169.
18. Freitas, A.V.L., 1999. Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera), Filogenia com base em caracteres de imaturos, com experimentos de troca de plantas hospedeiras. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, São Paulo.
19. Freitas, A.V.L., Brown, K.S. Jr., 2004. Phylogeny of the Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera). Syst. Biol. 53, 363 383.
20. Friedlander, T.P., 1984. Another look at the snout butterflies (Libytheidae: Libytheana). J. Lepidopt. Soc. 38, 139 141.
21. Fujioka, T., 1975. Butterflies of Japan. Kodansha, Tokyo.
22. Gaede, M., 1932. Erycinidae; Libythea; Nemeobius; Polycaena. In : Seitz, A. (Ed The Macrolepidoptera of the World. Supplement to Vol. 1. Alfred Keren, Stuttgart, pp. 237 238.
23. Gauthier, J., 1986. Saurischian monophyly and the origin of birds. In : Padian, K. (Ed The Origin of Birds and the Evolution of Flight. California Academy of Science, San Francisco, pp. 1 55.
24. Gauthier, J., Kluge, A.G., Rowe, T., 1988. Amniote phylogeny and the importance of fossils. Cladistics 4, 105 209.
25. Goloboff, P., 1999. NONA. Version 2.0. Published by the author, San Miguel de Tucumán.
26. Harvey, D.J., 1991. Higher classification of the Nymphalidae. In : Nijhout, H.F. (Ed The Development and Evolution of Butterfly Wing Patterns. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp. 254 273.
27. Hemming, F., 1967. The generic names of the butterflies and their type-species (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera). Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), Entomol. Suppl. 9, 1 509.
28. Hennig, W., 1950. Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik. Deutsche Zentralverlag, Berlin.
29. Hennig, W., 1965. Phylogenetic systematics. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 10, 97 116.
30. Hennig, W., 1966. Phylogenetic Systematics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
31. Hering, M., 1921. Die geographische Verbreitung der Libytheiden. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, Abt. A. 87, 248 296.
32. Holland, W.J., 1931. The Butterfly Book. Doubleday, Garden City.
33. Horovitz, I., 1999. A phylogenetic study of living and fossil platyrrhines. Am. Mus. Novit. 3269, 1 40.
34. Igarashi, S., Fukuda, H., 2000. The Life Histories of Asian Butterflies, 2. Tokai University Press, Tokyo.
35. de Jong, R., 2007. Estimating time and space in the evolution of the Lepidoptera. Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 150, 319 346.
36. de Jong, R., Vane-Wright, R.I., Ackery, P.R., 1996. The higher classification of butterflies (Lepidoptera): problems and prospects. Entomol. Scand. 27, 65 101.
37. Kawahara, A.Y., 2003. Rediscovery of Libythea collenettei Poulton & Riley in the Marquesas, and a description of the male. J. Lepidopt. Soc. 57, 81 85.
38. Kawahara, A.Y., 2006. The biology of the snout butterflies (Nymphalidae: Libytheinae), Part 1: Libythea Fabricius. Trans. Lepidopt. Soc. Jpn 57, 13 33.
39. Kawahara, A.Y. in press. Revision of the Extant and Fossil Snout Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Libytheinae). Thomas Say Publications in Entomology, Entomological Society of America, Lanham.
40. Kawazoe, A., Wakabayashi, M., 1976. Coloured Illustrations of the Butterflies of Japan. Hoikusha, Osaka.
41. Kearney, M., 2002. Fragmentary taxa, missing data, and ambiguity: mistaken assumption and conclusions. Syst. Biol. 51, 369 381.
42. Kluge, A.G., 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis for relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst. Zool. 38, 1 25.
43. Kristensen, N.P., 1976. Remarks on the family-level phylogeny of butterflies (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera). Zeitsch. Zool. Syst. Evol. 14, 25 33.
44. Lanyon, S., 1985. Detecting internal inconsistencies in distance data. Syst. Zool. 34, 397 403.
45. Liu, F.-G.R., Miyamoto, M.M., Freire, N.P., Ong, P.Q., Tennant, M.R., Young, T.S., Gugel, K.F., 2001. Molecular and morphological supertrees for eutherian (placental) mammals. Science 291, 1786 1789.
46. Martin, J.A., Pashley, D.P., 1992. Molecular systematic analysis of butterfly family and some subfamily relationships (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 85, 127 139.
47. Mengel, L.W., 1905. A Catalogue of the Erycinidae, a Family of Butterflies. With the Synonomy brought down to [October] 1, 1904. Published by the author, Reading, Pennsylvania.
48. Meyer, H.W., 2003. The Fossils of Florissant. Smithsonian, Washington.
49. Michener, C.D., 1943. Some systematic notes on the Libytheidae (Lepidoptera). Am. Mus. Novit. 1232, 1 2.
50. Nagano, K., Esaki, T., 1933. Records of the earlier stages of some Japanese butterflies, V. Zephyrus 5, 22 27.
51. Nixon, K.C., 2002. winclada. Version 1.0. Published by the author, New York.
52. Nixon, K.C., Wheeler, Q.D., 1992. Extinction and the origin of species. In : Novacek, M.J., Wheeler, Q.D. (Eds Extinction and Phylogeny. Columbia University Press, New York.
53. Novacek, M., 1992. Fossils as critical data for phylogeny. In : Wheeler, Q.D., Novacek, M. (Eds Extinction and Phylogeny. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 46 88.
54. Okano, K., 1987. A check list of libytheid butterflies in the world, with some bibliographical observations. Tokurana 13, 1 12.
55. Pagenstecher, A., 1901. Libytheidae. Tierreich 14, 1 18.
56. Pagenstecher, A., 1902. Lepidoptera Rhopalocera: Family Libytheidae, fascicle 5. Genera Insectorum, 5, 1 4.
57. Pagenstecher, A. (Ed 1911. Libytheidae. W. Junk, Berlin.
58. Patterson, C., 1981. Significance of fossils in determining evolutionary relationships. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12, 195 223.
59. Peile, H.D., 1937. A Guide to Collecting Butterflies of India. John Bale, London.
60. Peña, C., Wahlberg, N., Weingartner, E., Kodandaramaiah, U., Nylin, S., Freitas, A.V.L., Brower, A.V.Z., 2006. Higher level phylogeny of Satyrinae butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) based on DNA sequence data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 40, 29 49.
61. Poe, S., 2003. Evaluation of the strategy of long-branch subdivision to improve the accuracy of phylogenetic methods. Syst. Biol. 52, 423 428.
62. Scoble, M.J., 1992. The Lepidoptera: Form, Function, and Diversity. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
63. Scotese, C.R., Sager, W.W., 1988. Mesozoic and Cenozoic plate tectonic reconstructions. Tectonophysics 155, 27 48.
64. Scott, J.A., 1985. The phylogeny of butterflies (Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea). J. Res. Lepidopt. 23, 241 281.
65. Scott, J.A., Wright, D.M., 1990. Butterfly phylogeny and fossils. In : Kudrna, O. (Ed Butterflies of Europe. AULA-Verlag, Wiesbaden, pp. 152 208.
66. Scudder, S.H., 1889. The Butterflies of the Eastern United States and Canada with Special Reference to New England. Published by the author, Cambridge.
67. Scudder, S.H., 1892. Some insects of special interest from Florissant, Colorado, and other points in the tertiaries of Colorado and Utah. Bull. US Geol. Surv. 93, 1 35.
68. Seitz, A. 1906-1924. Die Gross-Schmetterlinge der Erde. 16 vols + 4 suppls. Kernen Verlag, Stuttgart.
69. Shields, O., 1984. A revised, annotated checklist of world Libytheidae. J. Res. Lepidopt. 22, 264 266.
70. Shields, O., 1985a. Zoogeography of the Libytheidae (snouts or breaks) [sic]. Tokurana 9, 1 58.
71. Shields, O., 1985b. Southeast Asian affinities in Colorado Oligocene Libytheidae. Tokurana Special 1, 13 24.
72. Shields, O., 1987. The geologic significance of Libythea collenettei (Lepidoptera: Libytheidae) endemic to the Marquesas Islands, south-central Pacific. Bull. S. Cal. Acad. Sci. 86, 107 112.
73. Shields, O., 1989. Systematic position of Libytheidae, diphylogeny of Rhopalocera, and heteroceran ancestry of Rhopalocera (Lepidoptera). Tyo to Ga 40, 197 228.
74. Shirozu, T., 1960. Butterflies of Formosa in Color. Hoikusha, Osaka.
75. Shirozu, T., Hara, A., 1960. Early Stages of Japanese Butterflies in Colour. Hoikusha, Osaka.
76. Simonsen, T.J., Wahlberg, N., Brower, A.V.Z., de Jong, R., 2006. Morphology, molecules and fritillaries: approaching a stable phylogeny for Argynnini (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Insect Syst. Evol. 37, 405 418.
77. Sokal, R.R., Rohlf, F.J., 1981. Taxonomic congruence in the Leptopodomorpha re-examined. Syst. Zool. 30, 309 325.
78. Wahlberg, N., Nylin, S., 2003. Morphology versus molecules: resolution of the positions of Nymphalis, Polygonia and related genera (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Cladistics 19, 213 223.
79. Wahlberg, N., Weingartner, E., Nylin, S., 2003. Towards a better understanding of the higher systematics of Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 28, 473 487.
80. Wahlberg, N., Braby, M.F., Brower, A.V.Z., de Jong, R., Lee, M.-M., Nylin, S., Pierce, N., Sperling, F.A., Vila, R., Warren, A.D., Zakharov, E., 2005a. Synergistic effects of combining morphological and molecular data in resolving the phylogeny of butterflies and skippers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 272, 1577 1586.
81. Wahlberg, N., Brower, A.V.Z., Nylin, S., 2005b. Phylogenetic relationships and historical biogeography of tribes and genera in the subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 86, 227 251.
82. Waterhouse, G.A., 1937. Presidential address: The biology and taxonomy of the australasian butterflies. Australia and New Zealand Association for the Advancement of Science. 23, 101 133.
83. Weller, S.J., Pashley, D.P., Martin, J.A., 1996. Reassessment of butterfly family relationships using independent genes and morphology. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 89, 184 192.
84. Wiens, J.J., 1998. Does adding characters with missing data increase or decrease phylogenetic accuracy? Syst. Biol. 47, 625 640.
85. Wiens, J.J., 2005. Can incomplete taxa rescue phylogenetic analyses from long-branch attraction? Syst. Biol. 54, 731 742.
86. Wiens, J.J., 2006. Missing data and the design of phylogenetic analyses. J Biomed Inform. 39, 34 42.
87. Wilkinson, M., 1995. Coping with missing entries in phylogenetic inference using parsimony. Syst. Biol. 44, 501 514.
88. Wilkinson, M., 2003. Missing entries and multiple trees: instability, relationships, and support in parsimony analysis. J. Vert. Pal. 23, 311 323.
89. Wilkinson, M., Benton, M.J., 1995. Missing data and rhynchosaur phylogeny. Hist. Biol. 10, 137 150.
90. Wilkinson, M., Benton, M.J., 1996. Sphenodontid phylogeny and the problems of multiple trees. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 351, 1 16.
91. Winter, W.D.J. (Ed 2000. Basic Techniques for Observing and Studying Moths & Butterflies. Lepidopterists' Society, Los Angeles.
92. Wootton, R.J., 1979. Functional, homology and terminology in insect wings. Syst. Entomol. 4, 81 93.
93. Yoshimoto, H., 1999. Notes on the western and eastern Snout Butterflies (Libytheidae). Butterflies 24, 50 55.