Reporting empirical research on adolescence: Reflections on the appeal of coherence, purpose and responsibility

Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 1-9

  Levesque, Roger J R ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic writing; Adolescence; Peer evaluation; Scientific communication; Written communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645575314     PISSN: 00472891     EISSN: 15736601     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10964-005-9000-y     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct (effective June 1, 2003). http://www.apa.org/ ethics/code2002.html#8_10 (Retrieved Dec. 1, 2004).
2. American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 5th edn., Author, Washington, DC.
3. Bakanic, V., and McPhail, C. (1990). If at first you don't succeed: Review procedures for revised and resubmitted manuscripts. Am. Social. 21: 373-391.
4. Bem, D. J. (2004). Writing the empirical journal article. In Darley, J. M., Zanna, M. P., and Rodiget, H. L., III (eds.), Complete Academic: A Career Guide, 2nd edn., American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 185-219.
5. Callaham, M. L., Knopp, R. K., and Gallagher, E. J. (2002). Effect of written feedback by editors on quality of reviews: Two randomized trials. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 287: 2781-2783.
6. Eberley, S., and Warner, W. K. (1990). Fields or subfields of knowledge: Rejection rates and agreement in peer review. Am. Social. 21: 217-231.
7. Eisenberg, N., Thompson, M. S., Augir, S., and Stanley, E. H. (2002). "Getting in" revisited: An analysis of manuscript characteristics, reviewer's ratings, and acceptance of manuscripts in Psychological Bulletin. Psychol. Bull. 128: 997-1004.
8. Hodges, C. J., Glenn, C., Gray, L., Miller, R. K., and Webb, S. S. (2004). Hodge's Harbrace Handbook (15th ed.). Harcourt College Publishers, New York.
9. Larson, R., Cauce, A. M., and Umana-Taylor, A. (2004). SRA and Diversity: The Results of a Membership Survey. http://www.s-ra.org/SRA.diver.report.htm (Retrieved December 1, 2004).
10. Lerner, R. M., Fisher, C. B., and Weinberg, R. A. (2000). Toward a science for and of the people: Promoting civil society through the application of developmental science. Child Dev. 71: 11-20.
11. Rodgers, R., and Rodgers, N. (1999). The sacred spark of academic research. J. Pub. Admini. Res. Theor. 9: 473-492.
12. Simon, R. J., and Fyfe, J. J. (1994). Editors and Gatekeepers: Getting Published in the Social Science, Rowan and Littlefield, Lanham, MD.
13. Sternberg, R. J. (2004). The Psychologist's Companion: A Guide to Scientific Writing for Students and Researchers, 4th edn., Cambridge University Press, New York.
14. Strunk, W., and White, E. B. (2000). The Elements of Style, 4th edn., University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
15. Tamashiro, D. J., (2003). How to get published: Guidance from journal editors. APS Observ. 16, 27-28.
16. University of Chicago Press Staff (Ed). (2003). The Chicago Manual of Style, 15th edn., University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
17. Wilkinson, L., and Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. Am. Psychol. 54: 594-604.
18. Williams, J. M. (1990). Style: Writing Toward Clarity and Grace. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.